In a recent “jungle primary” (all parties, all voters, and there but the grace of dog go the rest of us), long time us Senator Diane Feinstein resoundingly defeated fellow Democrat Kevin de Leon. But given that Feinstein has been a Senator representing the state since forever, the very idea of a challenge, and the very idea of a 51-33% victory, is a form of insurgency within the party. In this case, it is a progressive insurgency against a strong liberal. If you are outside the Liberal-Progressive zone, that might seem like cats fighting cats, but there is meaning to the differences. Liberals and Progressives all support the same policies, at the 20,000 foot level, but at the more detailed level, they are different. Both want health care for all. Liberals will tolerate a hybrid of insurance companies and some sort of Medicare for Everyone Else or a Public Option, while Progressives want nothing to do with the insurance companies and want a single payer. Or, depending on the individuals, Liberals and Progressives all want Universal Single Payer with no insurance companies, but Progressives want it now, and Liberals don’t think that is possible, and have more incremental plans.
Now, the California state Democratic party has had an endorsing event. You will see the following FALSEHOODS promulgated because of it:
- Now that Berniebots/Progressives have added their own candidate to the race, the Democrats can’t win, this race
- Progressives are going to throw Diane Feinstein out despite her great power and service and wondrfulness
- Other similar things.
But, the truth is, the way the system works in California, there are exactly two people running in the general election for Senate: Feinstein and de Leon. There are no Republicans, do the Democrat will win.
Also, given that Feinstein cleaned de Leon’s clock in the primary, you can bet that she’ll win the general election as well. But, who knows, either one could win.
There is relevance to what is happening here. Within the California Democratic Party, progressives have suddenly developed a significant power base, quite possibly displacing both centrists and labor. If that is a bad thing, don’t worry. Given the primary system in California, they can’t do too much damage. If it is a good thing, then this is a real good thing, in my opinion, because we actually need to have more progressives, and we need to drop the centrist, incremental, line and be more strongly true to our values.
Personally, I’d like to see Feinstein stay to continue the fight against Trump. Personally, I’d like to see de Leon win, because we need to be shifting towards a more progressive landscape. Personally, I’d like to see the Republican lose this race, and that is going to happen for sure because there is no Republican in this race.
So everything in California is good. Stop whinging, y’all!
3 thoughts on “Stop fretting about the Feinstein – de Leon thing”
In this case, progressives may be our most important problem.
We’ve recently seen a political party become polarized between those who would compromise to some extent to achieve some goal or part of a goal, and religious-type zealots who brooked no compromise — to the extent of blocking even otherwise acceptable candidates for judgeships and a willingness to send the country into economic crisis rather than allow the other party to do anything about anything. The intrangient wing is now flapping the U.S. government into a shambles.
California is hardly an apt model for the other 49 states. Since compromise is basic to any democratic system (including the small r republican version), having two such parties in an essentially two party system in a nation is a recipe for a quick end to democracy in my opinion.
Sorry, “intransigent” not “intrangient” in my recent post.
I think the axmin of this weeb site is really working hard for his
wweb page, as here every information iis quality
based stuff. https://Livestream.com/accounts/26952620