Wait, he was breaking into her house, she repelled him with the nearest object, and *she’s* facing charges? What about “My home is my castle” laws that let you shoot someone for knocking on your door, like that lost Japanese student in Florida, if you feel threatened?
Domestic battery is humorous when it’s novel.
Wait, he was breaking into her house, she repelled him with the nearest object, and *she’s* facing charges? What about “My home is my castle” laws that let you shoot someone for knocking on your door, like that lost Japanese student in Florida, if you feel threatened?
The second amendment does not cover the use of cervids.
It’s quite possible he still lived in the house, too. He would therefore still have a right to be on the premises.
I’m reading it the same at itzac. In fact, here’s more coverage:
http://www.tampabay.com/news/publicsafety/crime/deputies-zephyrhills-woman-jabbed-ex-with-antlers/1206265
He had as much right to be there as she did. I don’t think their plan to live together for the good of their daughter is working out,