Every one of those sounded like the well-reasoned objections and questions provided daily by skeptical and dissident blog-readers who aren’t intimidated by conventional wisdom or scientific collaboration.
You seem to have to refer to these as “insults” as some sort of bizarre ad hominem attack on the points they were making.
This is an impressive collection.
Why did they cut “Wanda” short when she was about to rail on Otto? Also, this makes me want to watch Glengarry Glen Ross.
Ha – this would have been a great opener for the “Profanity as a Frackin’ Function of Language” panel at CONvergence!
Mike, those were the exactly the two thoughts I had while watching this.
Every one of those sounded like the well-reasoned objections and questions provided daily by skeptical and dissident blog-readers who aren’t intimidated by conventional wisdom or scientific collaboration.
You seem to have to refer to these as “insults” as some sort of bizarre ad hominem attack on the points they were making.