There is a very interesting discussion going on at Sandwalk regarding adaptationism vs. … whatever that other thing is that Larry believes in.
But seriously, it is a very interesting discussion that is shaping up as a debate between John Hawks, who wrote a post on this topic recently, and Larry.
No organism is ever “perfectly adapted” for the environment. Additionally, the founder effect and genetic drift are also very important in population genetics, to assume everything comes down to natural selection is to ignore far too much research.
Esteemed Genetics;
Autismics ADHD boom is reasonably due to X-ray diagnostics used by spin Doctors on genitalia
Easy to evaluate mutations frequency in oöcytes genome because they are quite identical to mother genome
And so, You can compare the male child X-Chromosome to maternal-X-Chromosome for detecting subtelomeric deletions anomalous number;
The ionizing Radiodiagnostics on internal genitalia (pre-zygote oöcytes and spermiocytes) cause numerous deletions in subtelomeric most-exposed regions, especially in q-branch of long chromosomes (1-9).
Doctors accontable for autismics ADHD and others radiodiagnostics-induced diseases must be charged of genocide.
They must know dictyotene is X-rays-vulnerable