The Oath with Chuck Rosenberg

Spread the love

The Oath with Chuck Rosenberg is a podcast hosted by, you guessed it, former prosecutor and Justice Department administrator Chuck Rosenberg. You will know of Mr. Rosenberg as a regular justice expert guest on various MSNBC shows, especially the Rachel Maddow Show. Rosenberg was appointed as US Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia in 2006, and was previously a US Attorney for the Southern District of Texas, and later, Chief of Staff to Jame Comey at the FBI. He was administrator of the DEA from May 2015 to October 1, 2017. Appointed under Obama, departed under Trump.

Rosenberg stepped down from his post at the DEA because he had to either go along with Trump’s very wrong policies, or step away, which at the time was considered proper for justice department officials. (I suspect that is changing.) You may have heard his famous departing remark, issued in an internal DEA memo in response to Trump telling cops to get illegally tougher on the people they interact with:

The President, in remarks delivered yesterday in New York, condoned police misconduct regarding the treatment of individuals placed under arrest by law enforcement… I write to offer a strong reaffirmation of the operating principles to which we, as law enforcement professionals, adhere. I write because we have an obligation to speak out when something is wrong. That’s what law enforcement officers do. That’s what you do. We fix stuff. At least, we try.

Among his well known cases were the dog fighting charges against Michael Vick, the case against Zacarias Moussaoui, and work on child porn (against, not pro). So, not only has he great and interesting experience, but over time, he has made good friends with many key players in US Justice under the Bush and Obama administrations.

Because of these connections, and the high degree of respect he commands from his colleagues, it has been possible for him to put together a rather bang-up podcast. Different people will like or not like the subject matter, or will find it essential or outside their area of interests, but in fact, any one who listens to a good sampling of the interviews will learn things they didn’t know they didn’t know, but in fact, do need to know. I just now listened to his interview with Joyce Vance, also a regular on MSNBC as a commentator, and former AUSA in Alabama. (You also learn things like what “AUSA” stand for from this podcast.)

One thing I appreciate about The Oath is that Rosenberg, either through careful planning or skilled and thoughtful editing (probably both), makes sure the audience gets what they need to understand the story that is being told. He eschews the common fault many interviewer have of making sure the audience knows how much the interviewer knows, and asks what are probably utterly dumb questions from the point of view of an expert, but essential questions for the average listener. Like, “So what does AUSA stand for?”

I have never been a big podcast listener, but a while back, long after I started my own podcast with Mike Haubrich, I started to listen to a few, and I have a very short list of blue ribbon podcasts I keep up on. The Oath is one of them.

The podcast web page is HERE, but as is the case with most podcasts, you can listen to it with your favorite podcast accessing software on whatever device you use. Within reason.

Have you read the breakthrough novel of the year? When you are done with that, try:

In Search of Sungudogo by Greg Laden, now in Kindle or Paperback
Please note:
Links to books and other items on this page and elsewhere on Greg Ladens' blog may send you to Amazon, where I am a registered affiliate. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases, which helps to fund this site.

Spread the love

3 thoughts on “The Oath with Chuck Rosenberg

  1. More directly to this post: it is astounding to me that so many high-profile republicans who spent 8 years puffing their feathers and spouting how offended they were that President Obama was doing x, y, z, (even when their complaints were simply blunt lies thinly veiled to cover racism, which was almost always the case) and that those offenses were affronts to the Constitution and the rule of law now puff their feathers just as vigorously and proclaim that actual offenses of the type that once bothered them don’t matter.

    What does it take for any person to be able to so clearly show that they don’t really have a moral core? (And note, it isn’t just the Repubs in power: the usual right-wing posters here do the same thing.)

    1. Trumpists either don’t see it or actually like the lawless, blustering, and lying as a way to behave. Secret bullies they are. And they seem to be oblivious to the fact that damn near everything Don-the-Con does helps Putin and shames the U.S.

      To people outside of that despicable group, it is all too obvious, but with the Senate Republicans terrified of the current Republican base, there is little hope of an actual removal from office (which would only give us Pence anyway) but I’m hoping for a House of Representative impeachment that will tell history that not everyone was nuts and/or craven invertebrates in the U.S.A. of 2019.

  2. And they seem to be oblivious to the fact that damn near everything Don-the-Con does helps Putin and shames the U.S.

    To be fair, some of them are just as effing stupid as a brick. Brain Mast, Republican from Florida, tweeted (10/13/19)

    Happy birthday to the US Navy! To the men and women who serve to keep our waters safe, we thank you.

    He included in his tweet a picture of a cruiser, with “Happy Birthday US Navy” superimposed.

    Of course, it was immediately pointed out (on his twitter feed) that the ship is actually a Russian battle cruiser, identified as the Pyotr Velikiy.

    The stupidity is mildly understandable: he is a modern Republican, and he was elected from Florida.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.