Monthly Archives: September 2011

Goodbye Netflix, Hello Qwikster. And not really goodbye Netflix

I’m going to take the unusual move and post, below, and almost complete cut and paste of a piece of corporate informational mail from Netflix. If you are Netflix user, you’ve already got this in your email box, most likely. Before I do this, I want to explain why.

I’m not shy about critiquing corporations on this blog, but there are three things that compel me to be supportive of Netflix at this moment. I will add a bad thing or two about Netflix as well for those of you who hate kittens.

The first thing is that Netflix is not Blockbuster; Netflix is not obnoxious and evile like Blockbuster, it provides a better product, it is what Blockbuster should have been but was not smart enough or perhaps too greedy to be, and Netflix took a big chance with a totally new business model and made life better. Especially for me because I’ve never had very many friends and don’t get out much, so the little DVDs that came in the red envelopes were like my friends. Later, when Netflix started the streaming service, I still kept around a few DVDs (they were my friends, after all) but then I was able to not even have to go out to the mail box (which is down the street). So I could go out even less. Netflix became even better at enabling my hermit-like existence.

The second is that I think that Netflix has gotten the shaft lately when they changed their pricing policy. I had this big argument with all my in-laws all at once. Even my in-law’s in-laws were in on it. As a rule they all have higher end cable or satellite (or both) hooked up to 20 foot wide TV’s and surround sound. I estimate the annualized cost of hardware for the typical system as being at least $240. The cable and/or satellite costs must be between $100 ad $200 a month. And they still go out to movies to the tune of at least $40 a month. The change in Netflix price structure that occurred a couple of months ago when they separated their DVD service and their streaming service was less than $10 a month.

$20 + $150 + $40 >> $10. Yet, they spoke of Netflix as though it had crushed a puppy in front of a school yard of 6th graders. Apoplectic. Spitting, even.

I noticed a similar sentiment in various snorking arenas as well, especially on G+ for some reason.

I’ve told everyone in person why they are wrong about this, about how this is nothing like what Comcast or some other cable company might do to them in a given month’s bill without them even noticing or complaining, but no one listened. Very unfair. I realized that the reason people were mad is not because of the money, but because of the way Netflix made the change. More on that in a moment.

The third reason I’m supporting Netflix is that they’ve actually been very responsive to me. A few times I’ve complained about a technical problem with a feed, and they took money off my monthly bill. Once, on this very blog, I complained about an illogical feature of their Interface, and they totally changed their interface to exactly what I suggested. (I have it on my list of things to do to have Amazon change their interface next. I’ll keep you posted on this.)

There are down sides to Netflix. And, in fact, I’ve complained about them more than I’ve praised them, but that’s because this is a blog and that’s what we do here. In particular, I’m annoyed that the Roku uses Linux (which is good) but streaming on a computer requires Windows and Internet Explorer some Windows-only softare and does not work on a Linux computer. And in fact, with this presentation of a Pro-Netflix blog post, I will renew my efforts at biting at their heels on that issue.

In the meantime it appears that Netflix has realized what I realized the moment I saw it: The change in pricing structure was not bad and demonstrated, if put in perspective, that Netflix was actually NOT doing what the cable and satellite services were doing. But, people didn’t get that in part becuase Netflix told people about this policy in a way that made people mad, even though the change is not particularly enraging. Thus, the Netflix price structure change was a failure in … well, framing.

So, Netflix has a new strategy: They are actually splitting the streams into two distinct things, with two different names (one being Quikster, thus the title of this post). And, they are trying to make the whole situation more clear and more palatable. And, they’ve apologized for saying it wrong the first time around.

Pursuant to this, Netflix’s Reed Hastings has written the letter to which I refer, and a blog post. The letter is below, and the blog post is here.

Continue reading Goodbye Netflix, Hello Qwikster. And not really goodbye Netflix

The Ballad of Greg Laden

So, the other day, I was trying to find some links to podcasts that I’d done to put on my media page, so I did something that I would never otherwise had thought to do; I entered my own name in the search box at Apple’s iTunes store. Everybody has entered their own name in the Google Search box, right? But who thinks of searching for themselves on iTunes unless you are a musician.

Or, looking for your podcasts. Which I found, by the way, so that was good. But there was also a thing called The Ballad of Greg Laden.

So my brain started ticking away and it pretty much figured out that there would be a way to find out if your database is being searched for something, anything, and then convert what is being searched for into a reference pointing to a thing, then return the reference to the thing as though it was there all along so it appears that the search “found” it. Meanwhile, another process runs off and creates the thing real quick and puts it there so if the person doing the search clicks on the pointer to it, it’s there.

And in this case, the thing would be a pre-existing song, simply renamed on the fly.

And just as my brain was in the middle of figuring this out, my finger, acting independently, clicked the ‘buy” button so I got a copy of The Ballad of Greg Laden on my iTunes account.

On testing my hypothesis, though, I had to revise my model. I typed in some other names of people and they did not return the Ballad of Whomever. In the mean time, someone sent me via twitter, a link to an amazon.com page which had the Ballad of Greg Laden on sale:

i-5d1b75e08b6e2876308916e46e916090-ballad_of_greg_laden_on_sale_now-thumb-500x233-69227.jpg

So, I’m pretty sure this is a very interesting scam, but one that is smart enough that I can appreciate it. However, since I can’t replicate the behavior myself, I’ve come up with a refined hypothesis that i need you to test.

I think the search engine gets the name of the owner of the account or the computer on which it runs somehow and uses that to create the ballad. So, I need you to go to iTunes and search for your own name and see what happens. Report the results below.

If you are dumb enough to purchase the ballad, like I was, we can later compare them and see if they are all the same exact song. I’m betting they are. (There are no words on my version).

(Or is this just some internet meme that everybody knows about but me?)

Does Reuters proves that Fox News Viewers are Dumbasses?

Ninety percent of Fox News viewers believe that all of the founding fathers were born in the very country they founded, as post-embryos. Ninety four percent believe that Reagan lowered the National Debt and nearly 100% who receive Medicare oppose “socialized medicine.”

But you knew that. What you didn’t know and never suspected is that 15% of Fox News Viewers believe that George Washington defeated King George of England in a duel. Also, 70 percent believe that President Obama was born in Keny, and 38% believe that he was born in Indonesia, which means that -8% believe that he was born in the US.

And then, then it says “100% of Fox News viewers said they wouldn’t care if the entire country fell apart as long as Barack Obama isn’t elected to a second term.”

Oh wait, wait, this is satire. It’s not real

Or is it?

For Your Calendar!

The Minnesota Atheist book project deadline is September 30th. “This is a chance to tell your story while becoming a published author, and to support Minnesota Atheists’ mission of promoting positive atheism. This is an entirely volunteer effort, with all proceeds going towards Minnesota Atheists. The book, tentatatively titled Atheist Voices of Minnesota, will be a collection of writings by Atheists in or from Minnesota. For more information visit http://mnatheists.org/content/view/602/199/ , or email mnatheistbook@gmail.com.”

For Everybody who pretends to be in the zipcode is 55433:
Sunday, September 18, 9:00am-10:00am “Atheists Talk” Radio
AM 950 KTNF in the Twin Cities or stream live at http://www.am950ktnf.com.
Guest: Greta Christina. Contact us during the show with questions or comments at (952) 946-6205 or radio@mnatheists.org.

Then, later:

Southdale Library, 7001 York Avenue South, Edina, MN 55435
Celebrity blogger Greta Christina presents “Atheism and Anger”

Sounds great, I’ll have to check out her blog, I wonder if it is around here somewhere????

Twin Cities Nuclear What If

For the purposes of discussion in the Japan Disaster threads, I’ve made a graphic that very roughly approximates the zone of likely future very high rates of cancer if the Fukushima nuclear power plant were located where our (somewhat similar but smaller) plant is located, upwind during the winter of the Twin Cities. The lightened up area (circular) would be the zone in which agriculture would probably cease. Anyone who knows this area knows that the main outputs are electricity and produce!

This is not meant to represent what would happen here … different plants, different conditions, etc. The idea is just to make it easier for people from the area to understand the scale of space we are talking about here.

i-f21a0bf84b595d089db7711c26466bb6-TwinCitiesWhatIf-thumb-500x438-69215.jpg