Clicky and sticky: The secret to creating viral content

Twenty five centuries ago, long before the start of the common era, the written record about the spoken language began. The ancient Greeks were not likely the first to study speech and communication, and they certainly were not the first to write stuff down, but among the early writers, they were probably the first to write about how we construct messages and stories with words.

Joe Rom's Book How to go viral and reach millions. Greg Laden's BlogToday we are engaged in a great battle between those who respect, even demand, the truth, and those who care more about partisan power than advancing or even using knowledge.

Perhaps this is why we tend to quote the dead more than ever. During the current election season, I’ve heard the late great Senator Paul Wellstone (1944-2002) quoted at nearly every meeting of loyal Democrats. “We all do better when we all do better.” “The future will not belong to those who sit on the sidelines. The future will not belong to the cynics. The future belongs to those who believe in the beauty of their dreams.” “I represent the Democratic wing of the Democratic party.” “I’m short, I’m Jewish and I’m a liberal”

We remember the inspiring words of JFK. “As we express our gratitude, we must never forget that the highest appreciation is not to utter words, but to live by them.” “A child miseducated is a child lost.” “Those who dare to fail miserably can achieve greatly.” “Ask not what your country can do for you… ask what you can do for your country.”

To turn to the living for one moment, Gloria Steinem. “A woman without a man is like a fish without a bicycle.” “Some of us are becoming the men we wanted to marry.” “Childbirth is more admirable than conquest, more amazing than self-defense, and as courageous as either one.”

What do these memorable, moving, or emotive missives have in common? They all rely on rhetorical practices that have been part of language since, possibly, some ancient early stage of this unique human ability. Alliteration, Allusion, and Analogy are to language what a good set of planes and saws it to a carpenter. Parallelism, balance, and anaphora are used repeatedly. It is not hyberbole to suggest that metaphor underlies all of these statements. Human language, when used well, can shape minds, steer conversations, and cause more change than any military weapon.

Yet progressives, Democrats, and others on the left, even with their deep respect for and love of education, can’t seem to create a message that serves the struggle of keeping civilization on track. Why? I might guess it is because the eschewing of rhetorical forms has become the style of the day. Or, it could be because learning the rhetorical forms that work is hard to do, and our school systems, burdened under the ever increasing weight of standards across a wide range of subjects, had to squeeze something out, so rhetoric had to go. Whatever the reason, we are paying a cost. We need to dedicate serious effort to changing this.

Maybe it is a difference between private and public schools. Maybe the people who write for Republicans are from Exeter and the people who write for Democrats are from Stuyvesant High. This is not necessarily a difference in quality of education, but perhaps the elite prep schools know to teach about metonymy, epizeuxis, and enumeratio, because they know to weaponize the young else the efforts of the ascending generation would be in vain.

And yes, those forms of speech do sound like JK Rowlings-conceived spells one would cast with a unicorn-core wand made of ash. And they are, in the sense that powerfully crafted words are the original powerful magic.

Everybody left of center would do well to embrace tried and true ways to communicate, else that side of the political spectrum becomes extinct.

In an effort to combat this problem, Joe Romm, trained as a scientist, a student of rhetoric, a long time communicator of politics and issues such as climate change, has written an excellent book: How To Go Viral and Reach Millions: Top Persuasion Secrets from Social Media Superstars, Jesus, Shakespeare, Oprah, and Even Donald Trump.

Notice that the title of the book is rhetorically structured to attract readers.

Joe’s book does the rarely done task of integrating, as I imply above, the thinking of the ancient Greeks, the practice of rhetorical greats like JFK and MLK, and the more recent battle over messaging between Republicans and Democrats. This is further informed by reference to modern social science and psychology research.

This is really more of a war than a single battle, and the Republicans famously win most of the battles. Romm provides key insight as to how they do this, and how those on the left can to better. And when we do better, any of us, we all do better. It is said.

I’ll have to go back to see if Joe Romm explains why most of our paragraphs are so short these days.

Romm’s book is informative and offers inspiration, but it also offers very specific advice and guidance. It is well researched, authoritative, accessible, and memorable. Unlike so many other books on communication, it is a good piece of communication.

As an added bonus, Romm talks about his own experience with the publication process, an excellent source of helpful advice and perhaps inspiration for potential self-published authors.

I am happy that you are reading this review, but I’d be even happier if you would listen to my interview with Joe, which you will find as an installment of Ikonokast Podcast: Episode 21 – What messages go viral and reach millions?

Our conversation goes far and wide, and is not a systematic treatment of the book, so you will want to to both: buy the book and also listen to the podcast.

Finally, a challenge to Joe Romm himself: If you come across this post, can you suggest a better headline than my original? (“How to put together a message that will be clicky and sticky”)? One of these days, I’ll install a headline tester plugin. For now I’m flying with the stick. Which is probably a metaphor that went out of style about the time they invented sliced bread.

Spread the love

7 thoughts on “Clicky and sticky: The secret to creating viral content

  1. There’s a two-way relationship, a “family resemblance” so to speak, between the arguments made above concerning rhetoric, and the relevance of “diathetics” (Xenophon via Lawrence of Arabia), as these practices mutualistically inform and mis-inform our modern lives.

    To understand my teaser above, read this very provocative article – “Al Qaeda Won” – published in last week’s FOREIGN POLICY. It’s food for deep thought – think Orwell, think Mao, think Trump …

    https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/09/10/al-qaeda-won/?wpmm=1&wpisrc=nl_todayworld

    I consider this article a milestone, and I hope those of you who read the entire piece will appreciate the disturbing but real resonances it elicits about the “post-truth” world we now seem imprisoned in …

    1. Great article. Note that “diathetical” would probably be a real word we used today in the sense Lawrence created it had it not been for some skin disease or something (it is now an obscure medical term).

      But yes, this is exactly what this post is about (though the various rhetorical references, of which there about two dozen, will not be noticed by most readers). Today we would call it “controlling the frame.” The nature of thought about politics is shaped at this moment in time by the work of thousands of messaging experts working in dozens of conservative funded think tanks working independently from government agencies or universities, around the country (and a few elsewhere).

      The progressive side of the message has been shaped by a dozen writers who do not have a very large audience.

      The left has been diatheticized out of relevance.

  2. And yet I’m wondering, is the medical definition really all that tangential? –
    “a constitutional predisposition toward a particular state or condition and especially one that is abnormal or diseased” – Mirriam-Webster

  3. I’ll have to go back to see if Joe Romm explains why most of our paragraphs are so short these days.

    Just a guess but I suspect it is because people are suffering from sensory.information overload these days, resulting in shorter attention spans.

    1. probably. It’s in the nature of the web that if people don’t get what they’re looking for within a few seconds, they’ll click through to greener pastures… what happens when you’re drinking from a firehose. It’s too often poorly recycled sewage anyway.

      Not to mention that more people may be reading on tiny devices…

      Personally I break into shorter paragraphs on screen (back lit) because it’s easier on the eyes to scan.

      Dense blocks of text are a poke in the eye as far as I’m concerned.

  4. Just received my copy today and started the book at chapter one: How to Be a Winner like Trump without Being a Loser like Trump where I found (not to great surprise) that being a lying bullshitter is not a detriment when dealing with people for whom fantasies are more important than reality. As a scientist and teacher (retired) I am not very comfortable with that attitude and I wonder how, if that is what it takes to be persuasive, how anyone avoids turning into a lying bullshitter by adopting what are apparently excellent strategies, according to the book so far. I will persevere and maybe I will find out.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.