Time to take the science quiz

Spread the love

From the Christian Science Monitor:

You may have an opinion on climate change, evolution education, stem-cell research, and science funding. But do you have the facts to back up your opinion? This quiz will test your basic scientific literacy.

Go take the quiz and report back!

Have you read the breakthrough novel of the year? When you are done with that, try:

In Search of Sungudogo by Greg Laden, now in Kindle or Paperback
*Please note:
Links to books and other items on this page and elsewhere on Greg Ladens' blog may send you to Amazon, where I am a registered affiliate. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases, which helps to fund this site.

Spread the love

43 thoughts on “Time to take the science quiz

  1. You answered 49 of 50 questions correctly for a total score of 98%.

    Missed the question about the symbol for friction.

  2. I’ve got 44 of 50 questions correct. When I started going through it I thought “Gosh these are trivially basic” but it picked up and I readily admit that some I got right only because I’m good with multiple-choice tests.

  3. 50/50 although I had to guess about the “horsepower” knowing that the term “Watt” came much later (I was too lazy to try to figure out what that ridiculous foot-something entity would be equal to in metric units – which is OK since I would have come up with some funny metric unit of ~680 Watts). I also noticed the “previous” button, clicked on it, answered wrongly, clicked on it again and gave the correct answer again. It’s a strange ‘test’ that allows you to cheat.

  4. Meh … it’s good they didn’t ask for a horsepower/Watt conversion because I would have got that wrong… 745.something, not 680…
    Then again I could always click “previous” and pretend I never made a mistake.

  5. 46 out of 50 and most of the questions seemed absurdly easy for a scientist though I didn’t know what body was found beyond Pluto and some exotic stuff like that. And unlike your 50/50 commenter, I didn’t cheat using the Previous button to change my answers.

  6. I got 46 out of 50. Missed three physics/astronomy questions, which wasn’t surprising. Blanked on one chemistry question.

  7. 47 – I missed the surface gravity of Mars, the symbol for the coefficient of friction, and the meaning of “nimbus”. Some of the questions were more history than science. I admit I had to guess a few.

  8. 50/50 but then I also had top scores on AP Chemistry, Biology and Physics back in the day. That letter for coefficient of friction has other common uses in physics, but those typically aren’t seen at the high school level.

  9. 48/50, with a few educated guesses..always got meiosis and mitosis mixed up. Not a bad sampling of questions though

  10. I started it, and was cruising along, but I just realized that with 50 questions and a completed page load for each question and each answer, with all of the elements on each page reloading on each one, that I just don’t have the extra hour to do this. I got the Xenon question wrong, which is understandable. But then I realized that I had checked the box for 4.5 million instead of billion years for the age of the earth and realized that my impatience would prevent me from doing my best on this quiz.

  11. Not too bad, but there were also a number of science history questions as opposed to straight science.
    Also, a linguist, or anyone with a basic knowledge of greek or latin could also guess about 10 of the questions without knowing any science at all, due to the questions giving the etymology of terms, along with the scientific definition.

  12. I’m no design-nazi but a quiz that requires me to check 50 little radio-buttons and click on 100 page-arrows just to answer 50 questions can KISS MY HAIRY SCOTS ARSE.

  13. 45 out of 50, some were lucky guesses, using slight knowledge of greek and latin. some were based on knowledge of biology that didn’t even exist when I was at school. I was pleased at how much knowledge came back from the past (after over 40 years since graduating)

  14. I got 47 of 50, aided by a knowledge of etymology and some lucky guesses (as with “-nimbus”). I missed Newton’s first law (chose the second), the symbol for friction (chose epsilon) and mitosis (chose meiosis).

    It’s a pretty good quiz, although tedious with the two clicks per question, plus scrolling on some.

  15. I agree with the hairy -arsed Scotsman. I ran out of patience at 20/20, which is much better than my eyesight.

  16. 35/15, 70% — personally disappointed, missed a couple because of rushing.
    Overall a good quiz, including some hints in the questions themselves.
    Missing from the quiz: some science basics, about the process itself, i.e. hypothesis vs. theory, a basic statistic question etc.

    I think our candidates for President need to be locked up without electronics and given a good old fashioned 3 hour exam, all handwritten — I would like to see presidential candidates, in their own handwriting, answer a few basic quizzes on history, geography, science (not multiple choice, but writing answers in)

    Then they’d have to write a couple of longer essays on current topics (say overpopulation, climate change) along with a “why I want to be prez” essay.

    Results would be photographed and published on the web.

    Personally, this would help me judge a candidate much better than say, ads.

  17. 35 right, 15 wrong, is there anything I’m missing regarding my skills in copying the results from the Monitor page?!

  18. 49/50. I missed the one about “-nimbus”.

    Most of the questions were rather superficial, indeed. A few were about conventional notation, so for example anybody who never took a physics class (or hasn’t in several decades) shouldn’t feel bad about the one where they asked what symbol denotes the coefficient of friction. Also, the etymology hints were helpful in many cases.

    There was, however, one question that required actual math. That was the one which asked what acceleration would result from applying a 1 newton force on a 200 gram object. Still high school level, but at least it was a real question.

  19. 41 out of 50. Many stupid mistakes. It was fun taking the quiz but the design of the site was rather pathetic. Took too long to complete and I thought of quitting several times.

  20. 46 out of 50, but it was a while ago so I don’t remember the questions. The ones I missed were all nomenclature ones. I knew the science, just not the terminology.

    Very poor usability. Also, what is the CSM doing talking about science? They deny most of medicine.

  21. I am sorry to say I only got 60% (30/50). Then again, I have had no chemistry, math and I don’t talk, physics and I do best with explanations for non-scientists. In high school, my last year of science was a half semester in my first year.

    I’m just a science buff, and if I needed to use any of the information from or relating to the quiz, I would go to people who are scientists, rather than buffs. That’s why I read all these blogs by scientist.

  22. 44/50.

    Got 4 easy space/physics ones wrong but made up for it with about the same number of lucky guesses in the biology ones. Didn’t know the catalytic converter or the rock types.

    Also what they^ said about the site design.

  23. 37/50…missed a lot of the physics-related questions and some of the planetary questions regarding names of moons, etc.

  24. As others have said, ran out of patience after 10 questions (got them all right so off to a good start). A poorly designed quiz, perhaps designed that way so the site obtains multiple hits???????? Put 10 questions per page, all answerable, and let me see the answers after I’ve submitted, not after each flipping answer.

  25. 41/50

    I guess I shouldn’t be surprised that most visitors here posted good scores. Educated laypeople are the best deterrent against organized ignorance.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *