Tag Archives: OpenSource

Microsoft Dupes Library of Congress

Microsoft has paid the Library of Congress a huge bribe so that they will adopt some of their software, and use hardware running Vista in public areas. This is, of course, a travesty. As Boing Boing says, “Library of Congress sells itself out to Microsoft for a mere $3 mil” … You know this is George Bush’s fault. Continue reading Microsoft Dupes Library of Congress

R R R

That’s the sound of a statistician or scientist laughing because s/he has some really cool software and didn’t pay a dime for it, because it is open source.Since we are talking about R, I thought I’d point you to a couple of screen shots. Here it is running on a Mac, and here it is running on a Linux box.These images are about 200 K or so in size, and they come to us courtesy of The R Project for Statistical Computing

R 2.6.2 is released

This is not a big deal … it is mainly a bug-busting maintenance release with a few new features (listed below). I mention it, however, to remind you that R exists.R is in my view the most versatile and powerful statistical system available. Many people say it has a steep learning curve, but I think this is because it does not have a commonly used graphical user interface. In fact, if you are doing serious statistics, R is not harder to learn than any other professional system. Continue reading R 2.6.2 is released

Learning the Bash Shell

i-30a1e0366512a8ac50ae2cf969f02d73-learning_bash_shell.jpgFor the most part, computer operating systems all have a “shell.” When people talk about the “command line” … they are talking about the prompt in a shell. The concept of a shell, and the way we think of a shell today mostly stems from its implementation on Unix systems. A shell is a computer program that has a human interface and a number of built in or accessible functions (mostly other programs) that humans can invoke to make the computer do something. On ‘servers’ and on most computers back in the old days, the shell would typically appear as a prompt on a computer screen, and that would be all you would get. You type stuff in, and the computer types stuff as well, and between the two of you, stuff happens. On a computer with a graphical user interface (GUI), there is still a shell, but it looks different. The shell is less tangible to the human user, but the GUI itself is a program that provides the user interface, and it may either be the shell itself or it may be invoked automatically as the computer starts up by the shell. Continue reading Learning the Bash Shell

Google Wants Photoshop To Run on Linux

And they are paying for it.

Google is funding work to ensure the Windows version of Adobe Systems’ Photoshop and other Creative Suite software can run on Linux computers.For the project, Google is funding programmers at CodeWeavers, a company whose open-source Wine software lets Windows software run on Linux. Wine is a compatibility layer that intercepts a program’s Windows commands and converts them to instructions for the Linux kernel and its graphics subsystem.

Story here.

Linux X Server

To most desktop computer users, the difference between two “systems” (Linux, Windows, Mac, etc.) is in what you see when you turn the computer on, what you can click on with your mouse, how files are visually organized and manipulated, how menus work, and so on. This is the “look and feel” of a system. Since the “look and feel” has to do with how you actually use the computer, this can be the most important factor to a user choosing a system. But the “system” itself may have little to do with these differences.If you choose a Mac, you get a certain look and feel. If you choose Windows XP, you get a different look and feel. If you choose Vista, you get yet another. But if you choose “Linux,” you are able to choose among a wide range of LookAndFeels. Continue reading Linux X Server

Speaking of Technology …

Xii Monitor, a French web survey company, came out with the 2007 market share statistics, with interesting news about the Firefox browser. The Open Source browser’s market share has climbed to 28 percent of the European market, mostly at the expense of Microsoft Internet Explorer. The trend for the year shows a steady increase [source].Speaking of Microsoft, apparently executives at the behemoth are accusing IBM of being the prime mover in the recent global war against the Office Open XML ‘standard.’ According Microsoft’s senior director of XML technology, Jean Paoli, “Let’s be very clear … It has been fostered by a single company — IBM. If it was not for IBM, it would have been business as usual for this standard.” Nicos Tsilas, Microsoft’s director of interoperability and IP policy added, “They have made this a religious and highly political debate … They are doing this because it is advancing their business model. Over 50 percent of IBM’s revenues come from consulting services.”Microsoft executives also implicated “the likes of” (a phrase that may cause some alarm) the Free Software Foundation in this lobbying effort. Is this some sort of strategic rhetoric, or is it really the case that Microsoft does not get it? Is the megacompany aware of the fact that they are so annoying that everyone hates them? [ story here]i-f2803c900be4af8fc3e135cf93106db4-vista.gifSpeaking of being annoying, tech-geek publisher O’Reilly has recently released the latest book in their “annoyances” series. I won’t be needing a copy of Windows Vista Annoyances: Tips, Secrets, and Hacks, but perhaps you will.And, as long as we are on the subject of annoyances, have a look at MythBusters’ “7 Tech Headaches and How to Fix Them.” My favorite? “Computer operating systems loaded with stuff I don’t want and will never use.” The solution? ” Switch to a Linux-based OS such as Ubuntu. Since most Linux OSs are free, there’s no business reason to bloat up the system with feature frills.”