The three are organic chemists, and each independently came up with new ways to make complex organic molecules, in this case, carbon-to-carbon bonds.
The chemical processes are now used worldwide in commercial production of pharmaceuticals, including potential cancer drugs. The molecules are also used to make electronics, LEDs, and extremely thin motors, the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences said.
Have you read the breakthrough novel of the year? When you are done with that, try:
In Search of Sungudogo by Greg Laden, now in Kindle
or Paperback
*Please note:
Links to books and other items on this page and elsewhere on Greg Ladens' blog may send you to Amazon, where I am a registered affiliate. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases, which helps to fund this site.
or Paperback
*Please note:
Links to books and other items on this page and elsewhere on Greg Ladens' blog may send you to Amazon, where I am a registered affiliate. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases, which helps to fund this site.
These reactions have changed the way in which organic chemists think about synthesis. They are widely used in synthesis, in process and research chemistry. J. K. Stille would likely have replaced Negishi were he still alive. He was famous for using tin in these types of coupling reactions, and such a reaction is known as a Stille coupling. He died in a plane crash in Sioux City, IA.
@Rob
Yes, it’s an unfortunate anomaly that the Nobel doesn’t allow posthumous awards, especially given the timescales that are involved. (Not that the timescales are necessarily wrong — it often takes time to judge the true significance of someone’s work). Change to the Nobel may not be possible in any case, depending on how Nobel’s bequest was worded.
Maybe a parallel prize should be instituted which would give at least the honour of a Nobel-like title to those unfortunate enough to die before they get the Nobel. We could call it the Rosalind Franklin prize.
The Nobel Prize is in part intended to give weight or currency to individuals (This is especially true of the Peace Prize but not exclusively so.) So dead people are not too useful.
But the whole thing should be rethought. The categories are old and to some extent outdated. And, the fact that there is only one major prize that everyone knows about for all of science yet a dozen for entertainment is annoying.
Nonetheless, these three scientists, basic researchers, changed the way we synthetic chemists think about carbon-carbon bond formation.
The problem with Franklin is that she hid her data and refused to publish her hypotheses. That is not useful. Watson, Crick, and Wilkins went way out on a limb and published one of the most remarkable hypotheses in the history of science. Franklin had the same (or more of the) data, and refused to share her knowledge or publish it for others to see and use.
I think that the fact that there’s only one major prize gives it more weight.
Oscar winners are ten a penny; a Nobel laureate is somebody.