I just thought I’d pass on this letter from Rush Holt to Nancy Pelozi and Steny Hoyer:
Dear Speaker Pelosi and Majority Leader Hoyer:
In light of the troubling ruling this week that blocks federal funding for stem cell research, I am writing to request respectfully that you bring the bipartisan Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2009, H.R 873, or similar legislation to the floor of the House for a vote at the soonest possible date.
As a scientist, I was honored to attend the White House Ceremony where President Obama signed the executive order lifting the eight year ban on federal funding for embryonic stem cell research. In doing so the President drew from the declaration in his Inaugural Address that we will “restore science to its rightful place” and reawakened the hope of millions for the potential treatments or cures that might result for such diseases as cancer, Parkinson’s disease, and diabetes.
Yet, the flawed ruling this week by U.S. District Court Judge Lamberth has again put the future cures and therapies on hold. While the Obama Administration plans to appeal the decision, Congress must act quickly to permanently restore funding for this cutting edge research.
Most Americans seem to be coming to the conclusion that restricting any stem cell research and therapeutic cloning would be a grave mistake. Yet, because of the court ruling the NIH has already announced that 143 grants worth $95 million currently up for renewal will be frozen and in September another 22 grants totaling $54 million will be frozen. NIH Director Francis Collins said “this decision has just poured sand into that engine of discovery.”
Further, the uncertainty about federal funding may cause leading researchers to take their research abroad to more accommodating countries, and take with them the economic growth and job creation that will come as research becomes actual therapies and treatments. As a representative of the some of the leading life science companies in the country, I am troubled that we may be saying to them, and the countless companies that will be formed by researchers, that we are closed for business. In the current economy, we need to do everything we can to foster job creation, especially in innovative research businesses.
The opponents of this type of research say that we should pursue alternative avenues for research, such as adult stem cells, cord blood cells, and amniotic fluid cells. These types of cells have shown promise for limited, specific types of applications. We should investigate each one of them. Yet, that is not a compelling reason to block researchers from pursuing embryonic stem cell research, which experts agree holds the greatest potential because the cells are able to become any other type of cell in the body.
Again, I ask you to bring legislation to the House floor as soon as possible in September to permanently restore funding for this cutting edge research.
Sincerely,
RUSH HOLT
Member of Congress
Have you read the breakthrough novel of the year? When you are done with that, try:
or Paperback
*Please note:
Links to books and other items on this page and elsewhere on Greg Ladens' blog may send you to Amazon, where I am a registered affiliate. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases, which helps to fund this site.
I’m having a hard time understanding the details of this case. It seems Sherley and Deisher are complaining that increasing the availability of research funds for ESC research creates more competition and makes it harder for them to get funding. That’s trivially true, but doesn’t restricting the funds create the same problem for ESC researchers?
http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,2013287,00.html
The Time article lays it all out pretty well. Lamberth is a partisan hack.
Blocking federal funding for stem cell research is a preposterous notion at this time. Since this is a study that could possibly lead to some of the largest medical advances of all time there we cannot afford to block it. I understand that it is a very controversial study,dealing with aborted fetuses, but once they have been aborted I see no reason why this research can hurt anyone. Obviously I am not supporting abortion solely for research,I just feel that if the abortion had already been performed, then we might as well try to turn the negative into a positive. I recognize that this may sound gruesome to people but to put this into perspective, before you call me a â??baby killerâ?, consider this: if you do not let people experiment on these fetuses that have already been chosen not to live, you can in turn be killing someone who is sick and needs an operation that is only possible through stem cell research.