Darwin Award Nomination

Uncategorized
Spread the love

Tell me if this is a good nomination. It’s a two-fer. The incident ended in death, so this is the real thing, not some sort of honorable mention.

Two men from Illinois were run over and killed on a highway in southern Wisconsin (about an hour out from Madison).

They had been passengers in a car and started to argue. The driver of the car pulled over to the side of the road, the men jumped out and started to fight, and a drunk driver ran them both over. Fatally.

source

Have you read the breakthrough novel of the year? When you are done with that, try:

In Search of Sungudogo by Greg Laden, now in Kindle or Paperback
*Please note:
Links to books and other items on this page and elsewhere on Greg Ladens' blog may send you to Amazon, where I am a registered affiliate. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases, which helps to fund this site.

Spread the love

41 thoughts on “Darwin Award Nomination”

  1. Definitely not a Darwin award. You talk as though they deserved it. For fighting at the side of the highway? Really?

    Reply

  2. ApostateAbe:Could you be more clear on your objection. For instance, what do you mean by the word “it” in this case? Your comment is entirely to vague to make sense of.

    Reply

  3. Sorry, but this one just doesn’t have that little extra something required to raise ordinary dumbshititude to the level of the Brazilian priest who flew a lawn chair with weather balloons out over the Atlantic and ended up feeding the sharks.

    Reply

  6. Personally, I lost interest in the Darwin Awards years ago, when I realized that some of them were just urban myths and not real incidents. Are they more rigorous about verification these days?

    Reply

  8. What they were fighting over is key, maybe determinative. But one difference between these two and the “Brazilian Priest” is that these two guys in Wisconsin actually existed and actually got killed becasue they were too busy fighting to notice that they were on a highway.

    They failed to properly balance their competing risk functions. When birds do that they become owl food. When antelopes do that they become lion food. When monkeys traversing the canopy do this they are caught between the Monkey Eating Eagle and a fatal drop to the forest floor.

    I think the monkeys would get a Darwin Awared, Dammit!

    Reply

  14. I agree with Mike and DC – although DC’s example of the priest probably shouldn’t count (simply being a priest should technically remove you from the gene pool anyway!).
    In the case Greg wrote about above I would have thought that, stupid as it was, it wasn’t as bad as drunk driving that resulted in the deaths of several people.

    Reply

  15. There’s nothing selective, humorous, or ironic about the people drunk drivers kill.

    Now, if the drunk driver had hit the people and been killed for some self-inflicted ironic reason, then yes, give that man a darwin award! But he killed someone else. If this guy or his victims deserve a darwin award, we’d be handing them out like candy.

    Reply

  17. Holy Crap! I guess I was thinking of the apocryphal guy in the Southwest or California or someplace who was seen sitting in his chair by people in a jet liner.

    Anyway, this priest can’t get the darwin award. Having not reproduced yet is a (not really valid but widely accepted) condition, but the expectation of reproduction is also required, I would think.

    Reply

  18. I could have earned the award in 1969 or ’70, when inspired by the Beatles singing “Why don’t we do it in the road?” and a massive amount of hash a girlfriend of the day and I almost got run over on a stretch of blacktop in East Texas. Ah! The ’60s.

    Reply

  20. OK, so maybe THAT guy was real, but I guess I was thinking of the guy in New Mexico or Arizona who attached a used F=14 engine to his chevey to see if he could make it fly and it did, straight into a nearby mesa where you can still see the stain today. That one was a fake.

    Reply

  21. @Greg:

    The guy in California you’re thinking of was Larry Walters, who reached 15,000 feet on his lawn chair, (14,970 more than he intended). He was fined $1500 because he entered controlled airspace without establishing communication with the tower.

    Reply

  24. Greg Laden:

    The guy(s) with the JATO (Jet Assisted Takeoff) hooked up the Chevy was the subject of a rather long article in, I think, Slate several years ago. And, of course, Jamie and Adam tested it in one of their first episodes (if not the first) of Mythbusters.

    Reply

  25. I also think a Darwin award should at least go to someone who started out their entry with, “Hey guys, watch this!”

    Reply

  26. So, they really did that jet engine thing?????

    You know, I think the one I was actually thinking of was the one where the guys go out on he lake in their brand new pickup truck, and their dog, and done TNT, and the guy lights a stick and throws it to blast a hole (for fishing) into the ice.

    The dog, naturaly goes after the dynamite and brings it back, fuse still burning. The guys freak out and scream at the dog, who gets mixed messages …

    .. and runs under the truck just in time for the dynamite to go off, blowing up the dog, the truck, and making a big hole in the ice through which the truck falls.

    That’s the one that was made up. (The dog got the Darwin award, of course)

    Reply

  31. The original report said “Two guys were fighting in car A, and the driver of car A pulled over and two guys got out of Car A and were run over by Car B…. the Other car driver was cited for drunk driving” … and I took “other car” since the whole thing was about car A, to mean “Car B…” Subsequent reports have been much more clear so I think I was not the only person confused by this wording. (Or, if I want to be more Minnesotan, I should say “I was not the only person misled by this wording”)

    So, for instance, one report now says:

    “The driver of the vehicle that hit them was treated for minor injuries. Two children in her car weren’t hurt.

    The Darlington woman who was driving the vehicle Baker and Harris were in was cited for drunk driving.”

    Stephanie, I would not say that they were “lying down on the road.” At least in my mind, that implies that they were down for a nap or passed out or something. Rather, “Authorities say the men were not visible to Thompson because they were lying in the northbound lane of the road while fighting.” .. I don’t know, somehow “lying” is a bad word choice in that sentence. “Down on the ground fighting” might be better.

    Reply

  34. You know, I think the one I was actually thinking of was the one where the guys go out on he lake in their brand new pickup truck, and their dog, and done TNT, and the guy lights a stick and throws it to blast a hole (for fishing) into the ice.

    Adam and Jamie did that one, too. It was in one of the Alaska specials. I forget how it turned out, though.

    Oh, wait. I think they figured out that a dog could, theoretically, have done the fetch and return with the dynamite. But then they discovered that if the ice is thick enough to support a Ford Explorer than it’s gonna take a lot more than a single stick of TNT to make the truck go under.

    Reply

  35. Back in 2001, Indiana, 2 men were fishing with dynamite. The boat they were in floated over the submerged stick of tnt and killed one of the men. Seems that was worthy of the award at the time.

    Who can forget the father that played a trick on his family at the south rim of the Grand Canyon? From: “Over the Edge: Death In Grand Canyon” pps 16&17.

    There seems to many traditions that can be given the award, but the Wisconsin fighters deserve a special award that would have the added prestige of enhanced stupidity.

    Reply

  36. Geds: But when the dynamite blows up the truck, there is this gas tank thing… Have you see a Ford Explorer burn? I have no doubt whatsoever it would melt though a few feet of ice over the next half hour or so.

    I used to have bubbles on the right side of my car from driving bout 50 feet around a burning truck on the Mass Pike.

    Reply

  37. But when the dynamite blows up the truck, there is this gas tank thing… Have you see a Ford Explorer burn?

    Oooh, that’s a really good point. As I recall, they drained their test vehicle of all fluids so as to avoid contaminating the lake (y’know, any more than necessary) if it actually went through the ice. That particular modification to the scenario would change things drastically, though.

    I would highly doubt that your average ice fisherman drives out on a lake with no gas in the car…

    Reply

  38. When my husband and I were dating in the mid-1980s, he lived in an apartment on Commonwealth Ave. in Boston. From his living room window, we once saw a bunch of young guys brawling on the streetcar tracks. We immediately dialed 911, and got put on the infinite hold that often swallowed up 911 calls in Boston in those days. Fortunately for the idiot pugilists, a cabbie who was driving by swerved toward the tracks and blared his horn. They quickly dispersed before anyone had a chance to get knocked unconscious and left in the path of a speeding Green Line train.

    Ain’t no idiot like a fightin’ idiot.

    Reply

  39. So they were too busy fighting to notice their environment. Not unlike Mega-shark and Giant octopus who hated each other so much, they didn’t notice the ice age falling around them… egad, that was a terrible movie

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *