Have you read the breakthrough novel of the year? When you are done with that, try:
In Search of Sungudogoby Greg Laden, now in Kindle or Paperback
*Please note:
Links to books and other items on this page and elsewhere on Greg Ladens' blog may send you to Amazon, where I am a registered affiliate. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases, which helps to fund this site.
Like this:
LikeLoading...
Spread the love
0 thoughts on “Qdragon pwns Discovery Institute”
Correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t it perfectly legal to record a phone conversation if one of the two parties is aware, and it’s not to be used for commercial purposes? Or at least, if the jurisdiction of the person making the recording doesn’t have a specific law saying it’s illegal (e.g. California)?
Usually it will depend on the reasonable expectation of privacy, i.e., if it is not announced, there is an expectation of privacy. If it came to a court case, however, it will depend on the law in the state of the affected person, i.e., if someone in Virginia calls someone in Maryland, the caller could claim no harm because they were aware of the recording but they may be held liable under Maryland law because the recipient of the call could claim harm by not being informed the call was being recorded, i.e., in Virginia one party must know whereas in Maryland both parties must know.
I don’t know where the recipient of the call was. DI is in Washington State, but I’ve heard Luskin is in DC. Washinton State requires that within state recorded calls have consent of all parties. Canada requires one party. So she followed the law in Canada, broke the law in Washington. I’m not sure what the meaning of that is legally.
I suppose we’ll be hearing calls for invading Canadia again….
But we are not planning the invasion in a super-secret base on the bottom of Lake Superior, we are not planting a moosemindcontrol ray on Mackinaw Island and we are definitely not engaging in psychological warfare that would include littering, rudeness and bumping into people until they go mad from repeated apologies.
We will be wreaking vengeance for Celine Dione, stealing their healthcare system and sending all their trash back to them (at least the trash they put here in MI)…
And for the record, we won’t be using a giant elecromagnadoohicky type field to create a massive lens between the sun and their igloos!!!!!
I should note though, that we’re not invading because of this phone call thing – honestly that’s kind of funny…Nor are we invading because of Neil Young, because Neil fucking rules!!!!
Correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t it perfectly legal to record a phone conversation if one of the two parties is aware, and it’s not to be used for commercial purposes? Or at least, if the jurisdiction of the person making the recording doesn’t have a specific law saying it’s illegal (e.g. California)?
@Jason – it’s legal. Besides that – the kid is in Canada.
Jason,
Usually it will depend on the reasonable expectation of privacy, i.e., if it is not announced, there is an expectation of privacy. If it came to a court case, however, it will depend on the law in the state of the affected person, i.e., if someone in Virginia calls someone in Maryland, the caller could claim no harm because they were aware of the recording but they may be held liable under Maryland law because the recipient of the call could claim harm by not being informed the call was being recorded, i.e., in Virginia one party must know whereas in Maryland both parties must know.
I don’t know where the recipient of the call was. DI is in Washington State, but I’ve heard Luskin is in DC. Washinton State requires that within state recorded calls have consent of all parties. Canada requires one party. So she followed the law in Canada, broke the law in Washington. I’m not sure what the meaning of that is legally.
I suppose we’ll be hearing calls for invading Canadia again….
Are you kidding, Greg? DuWayne and Toaster Sunshine are both all over that at their respective blogs.
It’s legal in Canada if ONE party knows it’s being recorded, or so I understand.
Lunkin forgets that to complain for Fox, one must be authorized by Fox to do so.
So, are we invading then?
Absofuckinglutely!!!!!1!111!!!1
But we are not planning the invasion in a super-secret base on the bottom of Lake Superior, we are not planting a moosemindcontrol ray on Mackinaw Island and we are definitely not engaging in psychological warfare that would include littering, rudeness and bumping into people until they go mad from repeated apologies.
We will be wreaking vengeance for Celine Dione, stealing their healthcare system and sending all their trash back to them (at least the trash they put here in MI)…
And for the record, we won’t be using a giant elecromagnadoohicky type field to create a massive lens between the sun and their igloos!!!!!
Those bastards put trash in Michigan?
I should note though, that we’re not invading because of this phone call thing – honestly that’s kind of funny…Nor are we invading because of Neil Young, because Neil fucking rules!!!!
We’re invading because of this!!!1!111!!!!
Yeah. I mean they paid us for taking it, but fuck that shit!!!!11!1!!111!1
Those hosers tricked you!!!!11!!! How dare they!!!11!!