Daily Archives: September 19, 2011

Climate Scientists Defended!

i-c850261749cff569a1cd9bd7f7346da9-defense_fund_logo-thumb-178x179-69264.gifYou’ll remember that a few days ago I asked people to contribute to the Climate Scientists Defense Fun. They needed money to stop denialists from personally harassing scientists. The needed funds were obtained from your donations and all is well!!!!

However, the people who organized this have decided to try to generate a standing fund for this purpose, and have asked us bloggers who discuss these issues to let people know about. It is still being developed, but you can learn more about it here.

Thanks for all your help and generosity!

How To Do Good Climate Science Instead Of Bad Climate Science

ResearchBlogging.orgIn order to do good climate science, you have to understand and control for the sources of variation in the system. In any system that involvs metric change over time, there are four sources of variation:
Continue reading How To Do Good Climate Science Instead Of Bad Climate Science

What is a blog post?

Paul Hutchinson (Hutch) is annoyed. Check it out.

I agree that a “blog” is not a post. A post is a blog post just like an article in a magazine is a magazine article, but a post is analogous to an article.

I would add this: A comment on a blog post is not a post. It is a comment. Feel free to comment below or on Paul’s post if you like.

Oh, wait, you can’t comment on Paul’s Blog posts because comments are closed on his blog. Which makes me wonder if it is really a blog. It may not be technically true, but a blog should have a comment section, in my view. And, I know Paul’s web site is a blog (and not an “I’m not a blog I’m a web site” blog) because he calls it a blog in the name of the web site.

Goodbye Netflix, Hello Qwikster. And not really goodbye Netflix

I’m going to take the unusual move and post, below, and almost complete cut and paste of a piece of corporate informational mail from Netflix. If you are Netflix user, you’ve already got this in your email box, most likely. Before I do this, I want to explain why.

I’m not shy about critiquing corporations on this blog, but there are three things that compel me to be supportive of Netflix at this moment. I will add a bad thing or two about Netflix as well for those of you who hate kittens.

The first thing is that Netflix is not Blockbuster; Netflix is not obnoxious and evile like Blockbuster, it provides a better product, it is what Blockbuster should have been but was not smart enough or perhaps too greedy to be, and Netflix took a big chance with a totally new business model and made life better. Especially for me because I’ve never had very many friends and don’t get out much, so the little DVDs that came in the red envelopes were like my friends. Later, when Netflix started the streaming service, I still kept around a few DVDs (they were my friends, after all) but then I was able to not even have to go out to the mail box (which is down the street). So I could go out even less. Netflix became even better at enabling my hermit-like existence.

The second is that I think that Netflix has gotten the shaft lately when they changed their pricing policy. I had this big argument with all my in-laws all at once. Even my in-law’s in-laws were in on it. As a rule they all have higher end cable or satellite (or both) hooked up to 20 foot wide TV’s and surround sound. I estimate the annualized cost of hardware for the typical system as being at least $240. The cable and/or satellite costs must be between $100 ad $200 a month. And they still go out to movies to the tune of at least $40 a month. The change in Netflix price structure that occurred a couple of months ago when they separated their DVD service and their streaming service was less than $10 a month.

$20 + $150 + $40 >> $10. Yet, they spoke of Netflix as though it had crushed a puppy in front of a school yard of 6th graders. Apoplectic. Spitting, even.

I noticed a similar sentiment in various snorking arenas as well, especially on G+ for some reason.

I’ve told everyone in person why they are wrong about this, about how this is nothing like what Comcast or some other cable company might do to them in a given month’s bill without them even noticing or complaining, but no one listened. Very unfair. I realized that the reason people were mad is not because of the money, but because of the way Netflix made the change. More on that in a moment.

The third reason I’m supporting Netflix is that they’ve actually been very responsive to me. A few times I’ve complained about a technical problem with a feed, and they took money off my monthly bill. Once, on this very blog, I complained about an illogical feature of their Interface, and they totally changed their interface to exactly what I suggested. (I have it on my list of things to do to have Amazon change their interface next. I’ll keep you posted on this.)

There are down sides to Netflix. And, in fact, I’ve complained about them more than I’ve praised them, but that’s because this is a blog and that’s what we do here. In particular, I’m annoyed that the Roku uses Linux (which is good) but streaming on a computer requires Windows and Internet Explorer some Windows-only softare and does not work on a Linux computer. And in fact, with this presentation of a Pro-Netflix blog post, I will renew my efforts at biting at their heels on that issue.

In the meantime it appears that Netflix has realized what I realized the moment I saw it: The change in pricing structure was not bad and demonstrated, if put in perspective, that Netflix was actually NOT doing what the cable and satellite services were doing. But, people didn’t get that in part becuase Netflix told people about this policy in a way that made people mad, even though the change is not particularly enraging. Thus, the Netflix price structure change was a failure in … well, framing.

So, Netflix has a new strategy: They are actually splitting the streams into two distinct things, with two different names (one being Quikster, thus the title of this post). And, they are trying to make the whole situation more clear and more palatable. And, they’ve apologized for saying it wrong the first time around.

Pursuant to this, Netflix’s Reed Hastings has written the letter to which I refer, and a blog post. The letter is below, and the blog post is here.

Continue reading Goodbye Netflix, Hello Qwikster. And not really goodbye Netflix