Imma leave this one up to my readers: Why is this wrong? Or is it not wrong? Please enter your verdict and the reasoning behind it below:<\/p>\n
Outrage as BBC chooses panda as 2011 female face<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n LONDON (Reuters) – The BBC has ignited its second sexism spat in the space of a month by choosing a panda as one of its 12 female faces of the year.<\/p>\n Last week, it was criticised for choosing its annual BBC Sports Personality of the Year from an entirely male shortlist. To me, this may depend on context and background to be found deeper in the article, so do have a look.<\/p>\n …a quarter of the female faces this year were chosen for their involvement in marriages.<\/p>\n They include Prince William’s new sister-in-law Pippa Middleton, South African Charlene Wittstock who married Prince Albert of Monaco and Spanish billionaire the Duchess of Alba, 85, who tied the knot with a civil servant 24 years her junior.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n And the author of the piece noted: “I didn’t choose the BBC women faces of the year subjects — just wrote them. Two black eyes from wife though. Pandamonium!”<\/p>\n All I can say is that I hope Amanda does not catch me writing this blog post about Pandas!<\/p>\n And there’s more. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Imma leave this one up to my readers: Why is this wrong? Or is it not wrong? Please enter your verdict and the reasoning behind it below: Outrage as BBC chooses panda as 2011 female face LONDON (Reuters) – The BBC has ignited its second sexism spat in the space of a month by choosing … Continue reading Can a Panda be a Yoo-Man Girl?<\/span>
\nThe decision to include the face of Tian Tian (Sweetie), a female panda whose arrival at Edinburgh Zoo on loan from China generated huge publicity earlier this month, has provoked a storm of angry tweets, including one from former deputy Prime Minister John Prescott.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n