{"id":24955,"date":"2011-03-22T14:50:32","date_gmt":"2011-03-22T14:50:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/gregladen\/2011\/03\/22\/reconsidering-nuclear-energy\/"},"modified":"2011-03-22T14:50:32","modified_gmt":"2011-03-22T14:50:32","slug":"reconsidering-nuclear-energy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gregladen.com\/blog\/2011\/03\/22\/reconsidering-nuclear-energy\/","title":{"rendered":"Reconsidering Nuclear Energy"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Risk, Trust, and the Arrogance of Numbers<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\n&#8230;The coal and biofuel safety numbers don&#8217;t come with a disclaimer that the greatest number of additional deaths from these fuels are due to indoor use for cooking, not from industrial energy production. Wind and solar energy numbers don&#8217;t reflect that these are developing industries, without decades of safety standards behind them. (Including development numbers for nuclear would drastically change the picture there, given that it was a technology born out of war.) None of these numbers include the costs of destruction of ecosystems, displacement, and unrest caused by the exploitation of resources required&#8230;.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/almostdiamonds.blogspot.com\/2011\/03\/risk-trust-and-arrogance-of-numbers.html\">Read an interesting commentary about the numbers<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Taiwan: The Reassurance of Nuclear Safety is Not Convincing<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Following the Fukushima nuclear accident in Japan, there are calls now for a review of Taiwan&#8217;s nuclear energy policy, particularly as a fourth nuclear power plant is now under construction.<\/p>\n<p>Lin Tsung-yao (\u00e6??\u00e5\u00ae?\u00e5\u00a0\u00af), member of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant Safety Monitoring Committee, has called upon [zh] the Taiwan Power company to do a thorough reevaluation of construction of its fourth nuclear power plant&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/globalvoicesonline.org\/2011\/03\/21\/taiwan-the-reassurance-of-nuclear-safety-is-not-convincing\/\">More<\/a>\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong><br \/>\nCalif. panel weighs nuclear safety after quake<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>State senators are reviewing whether California&#8217;s nuclear power plants and gas pipelines are safe from earthquakes as Japan&#8217;s scramble to control its damaged reactors brings up uncomfortable similarities to the nuclear plants on America&#8217;s seismically active West Coast.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Japan has always been a leader in preparedness,&#8221; said Sen. Ellen Corbett, the San Leandro Democrat who chairs the Senate Select Committee on Earthquake and Disaster Preparedness, Response and Recovery. &#8220;It&#8217;s time to revisit the safety of these plants in light of what we have learned from Japan,&#8221; she said at a hearing Monday&#8230;..<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scpr.org\/news\/2011\/03\/21\/calif-panel-weighs-nuclear-safety-after-quake\/\">more<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><strong><br \/>\nIAEA concerned, lacks info on Japan nuclear plant<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>VIENNA &#8211; The UN atomic agency said on Tuesday it was concerned that it had not received some information from Japan about its stricken nuclear plant, saying the overall situation remained &#8220;very serious.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We have not received validated information for some time related to the containment integrity of unit 1. So we are concerned that we do not know its exact status,&#8221; Graham Andrew, a senior official of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), told a news conference.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.jpost.com\/Headlines\/Article.aspx?id=213299\">More<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Risk, Trust, and the Arrogance of Numbers &#8230;The coal and biofuel safety numbers don&#8217;t come with a disclaimer that the greatest number of additional deaths from these fuels are due to indoor use for cooking, not from industrial energy production. Wind and solar energy numbers don&#8217;t reflect that these are developing industries, without decades of &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/gregladen.com\/blog\/2011\/03\/22\/reconsidering-nuclear-energy\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Reconsidering Nuclear Energy<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"1","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[1423],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p5fhV1-6uv","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gregladen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24955"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gregladen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gregladen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gregladen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gregladen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24955"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/gregladen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24955\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gregladen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24955"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gregladen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24955"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gregladen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24955"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}