{"id":23221,"date":"2016-11-02T17:26:24","date_gmt":"2016-11-02T22:26:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/gregladen\/?p=23221"},"modified":"2016-11-02T17:26:24","modified_gmt":"2016-11-02T22:26:24","slug":"most-recent-polling-shows-tight-race","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gregladen.com\/blog\/2016\/11\/02\/most-recent-polling-shows-tight-race\/","title":{"rendered":"Most Recent Polling Shows Tight Race"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/projects.fivethirtyeight.com\/2016-election-forecast\/updates\/\">Trump&#8217;s chance of victory have doubled over the last two weeks<\/a>,&#8221; notes FiveThirtyEight, and this is in accord with what I&#8217;ve been saying.<\/p>\n<p>I <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/gregladen\/2016\/10\/31\/the-electoral-college-map-one-week-out-clinton-victory-likely-but-not-assured\/\">suggested a few days ago<\/a> that while Clinton would probably win, there is a nowhere near zero chance that she won&#8217;t.  FiveThirtyEight came out with an analysis today very similar to mine, suggesting that Trump has abut <a href=\"http:\/\/fivethirtyeight.com\/features\/election-update-yes-donald-trump-has-a-path-to-victory\/\">a 3 in 10 chance of winning<\/a>. Historically, races tighten near the end, I think <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/gregladen\/2016\/09\/10\/how-the-press-created-frankentrump-and-ruined-civilization\/\">FOR THIS REASON<\/a> mainly, and that has been happening. The actual national difference between Clinton and Trump by Tuesday will probably be about 2.5 percent or so.<\/p>\n<p>Now, before you jump in to tell me that the national number isn&#8217;t what counts, yada yada yada, let me note right away that I do know about the Electoral College and stuff.<\/p>\n<p>Anyway, see <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/gregladen\/2016\/10\/31\/the-electoral-college-map-one-week-out-clinton-victory-likely-but-not-assured\/\">this<\/a> for my most recent Electoral College analysis, and I&#8217;ll have a new one out in a day or so, though I expect it to be similar.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, here are some notes on some of the more interesting and important races.<\/p>\n<p>No cherry picking here. All of the really recent, high ranked (by FiveThirtyEight) polls in states of interest. All these polls were released over the last few days, though they may cover earlier days. The data are all taken from <a href=\"http:\/\/projects.fivethirtyeight.com\/2016-election-forecast\/updates\/\">FiveThirtyEight<\/a>, but using the original poll numbers, not FiveThirtyEight\u2019s adjustment.<\/p>\n<p>Note: Polls that weight on the basis of motivation seem to favor Trump; his voters say they are more likely to vote.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Arizona, when it isn\u2019t busy shooting something, generally votes for the Republican. There was hope this would not happen this year, but the latest polls suggest otherwise<\/strong><br \/>\nArizona CNN\/Opinion Trump +5<br \/>\nArizona Emerson Trump +4<br \/>\nArizona Google CS Clinton +5<\/p>\n<p><strong>Florida is a very important states, and there are signs of Clinton weakening there, but most indicators suggest a Clinton win. Also, the TargetSmart study (not shown here) indicates that 28% of Republicans who voted early are voting for Clinton.<\/strong><br \/>\nFlorida CNN\/Opinion Clinton +2<br \/>\nFlorida Google CS Trump +3<br \/>\nFlorida Quinnipiac Clinton +1<br \/>\nFlorida TargetSmart (Not rated by 538) Clinton +8<\/p>\n<p><strong>People mention Georgia now and then. We\u2019ll be watching Georgia, because if Clinton wins there, the world has changed. But she won\u2019t.<\/strong><br \/>\nGeorgia Emerson Trump +9<br \/>\nGeorgia Google CS Trump +9<\/p>\n<p><strong>I\u2019ve been predicting a Clinton win in Iowa, many polls indicate otherwise, the latest Google Consumer Survey suggests a Clinton win.<\/strong><br \/>\nIowa Google CS CLinton +7<\/p>\n<p><strong>Nevada. I hear people saying that Clinton has Nevada in the bag. She doesn\u2019t. My model currently has her winning there, but clearly there is ambiguity.<\/strong><br \/>\nNevada CNN\/Opinion Trump +6<br \/>\nNevada Google CS Clinton +7<\/p>\n<p><strong>New Hampshire has not been declared a solid sate for anyone, yet many seem to insist it is solid for Clinton. It isn\u2019t, but also, there isn\u2019t much good polling there, so really, we don\u2019t know.<\/strong><br \/>\nNew Hampshire Google CS Trump +1<\/p>\n<p><strong>North Carolina is totally uncertain for many reasons, including polling all over the map, an active voter suppression campaign by the Republican party, and because it is, well, North Carolina.<\/strong><br \/>\nNorth Carolina Elon Clinton +1<br \/>\nNorth Carolina Google CS Trump +6<br \/>\nNorth Carolina Quinnipiac Clinton +3<br \/>\nNorth Carolina SurveyUSA Trump +7<\/p>\n<p><strong>Everyone I know who is from Ohio or lives in Ohio loves Ohio and hardly ever shuts up about it. Time to shut up about it! You\u2019all are about to go for Trump, so you suck.<\/strong><br \/>\nOhio Google CS Trump +2<br \/>\nOhio Quinnipiac Trump +5<\/p>\n<p><strong>Pennsylvania seems solidly Clinton, though if I recall, Pennsylvania has sometimes thrown a surprise. But not likely this year.<\/strong><br \/>\nPennsylvania CNN\/Opinion Clinton +4<br \/>\nPennsylvania Franklin &amp; Marshall Clinton +11<br \/>\nPennsylvania Google CS Trump +2<br \/>\nPennsylvania Monmouth Clinton +4<br \/>\nPennsylvania Quinnipac Clinton +5<br \/>\nPennsylvania Susquehanna Clinton +2<\/p>\n<p><strong>We fully expect Clinton to take Virginia.<\/strong><br \/>\nVirginia Emerson Clinton +4<br \/>\nVirginia Google CS Clinton +5<br \/>\nVirginia Hampton Trump +3<br \/>\nVirginia WaPo Clinton +6<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;Trump&#8217;s chance of victory have doubled over the last two weeks,&#8221; notes FiveThirtyEight, and this is in accord with what I&#8217;ve been saying. I suggested a few days ago that while Clinton would probably win, there is a nowhere near zero chance that she won&#8217;t. FiveThirtyEight came out with an analysis today very similar to &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/gregladen.com\/blog\/2016\/11\/02\/most-recent-polling-shows-tight-race\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Most Recent Polling Shows Tight Race<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":23222,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[1759,774,772,2301,2303,964],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p5fhV1-62x","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gregladen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23221"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gregladen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gregladen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gregladen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gregladen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23221"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/gregladen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23221\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gregladen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gregladen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23221"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gregladen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=23221"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gregladen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=23221"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}