But not as severely as they should have been.<\/p>\n
The IPCC, as you know, comes out with a set of reports every five years. The reports are written by groups of experts. Draft reports are widely accessible to people who register themselves as “experts” and there is no quality control in that process, in order to keep things as transparent as possible. This means that the worst climate change denialists can simply sign up as “experts” and flood the scientists trying to write these reports with irrelevant and stupid comments, thus, I presume, wasting valuable time and effort. But, such is the cost of transparency, which is important.<\/p>\n
But, even the climate change denailits, who tend to be a rowdy group with with only a vague grasp, if any, on ethics and who generally have very little respect for truth, have to promise to not release any part of the draft that they have had the privilege to see and comment on. This is very important for reasons that are so blindingly obvious I won’t bother explaining them here.<\/p>\n
Well, over the last few days, one of the denialsts, in comments on one of the famous denialist blogs, released sections of the report. The part he released, essentially, said:<\/p>\n
“There is this idea X which suggests that Y happens. There is no evidence that this is true but we looked carefully at it and there is still no evidence that this is true.”<\/p>\n
But by cherry picking and providing a lie as context, the climate change science denier (CCSD) made it say:<\/p>\n
“There is t his idea X which suggests that Y happens. Y means global warming is not real. This is in the ICPP report. This is a game changer.”<\/p>\n
Below I’m going to give you links to a handful of the blog posts out there that explain exactly what happened, as well as a document just released by the IPCC expressing regret that one of the “expert reviewers” did this thing that should not have been done.<\/p>\n
I wonder if that person’s “expert” status will remain in place. It probably should. The whinging and moaning that would result from someone violating the rules being tossed out, from the CCSD afflicted community, would be more annoying than letting the jerk continue to pretend that he is an “expert” on something.<\/p>\n
Landmark climate change report leaked online<\/a><\/p>\n Leak of Climate Panel Drafts Speaks to Need for New Process<\/a><\/p>\n IPCC report leaked then cherry-picked<\/a><\/p>\n Draft IPCC report leaked<\/a><\/p>\n Major IPCC Report Draft Leaked Then Cherry-Picked By Climate Sceptic<\/a><\/p>\n IPCC Draft Report Leaked, Shows Global Warming is NOT Due to the Sun<\/a><\/p>\n PDF File of Statement By IPCC is HERE<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" But not as severely as they should have been. The IPCC, as you know, comes out with a set of reports every five years. The reports are written by groups of experts. Draft reports are widely accessible to people who register themselves as “experts” and there is no quality control in that process, in order … Continue reading Climate Change Denialists Scolded by IPCC<\/span>