Since the Daily Mail is a British thing and the latest form of entertainment in Britain is Libel Tourism, I won’t say to you that the Daily Mail is a rag full of lies and deceit. Instead, I’ll let you be the judge.<\/p>\n
These studies:<\/p>\n
Decline in solar output unlikely to offset global warming<\/strong><\/p>\n 23 January 2012 – New research has found that solar output is likely to reduce over the next 90 years but that will not substantially delay expected increases in global temperatures caused by greenhouse gases.<\/p>\n Carried out by the Met Office and the University of Reading, the study establishes the most likely changes in the Sun’s activity and looks at how this could affect near-surface temperatures on Earth.<\/p>\n It found that the most likely outcome was that the Sun’s output would decrease up to 2100, but this would only cause a reduction in global temperatures of 0.08 \u00c2\u00b0C. This compares to an expected warming of about 2.5 \u00c2\u00b0C over the same period due to greenhouse gases (according to the IPCC’s B2 scenario for greenhouse gas emissions that does not involve efforts to mitigate emissions).<\/p>\n Gareth Jones, a climate change detection scientist with the Met Office, said: “This research shows that the most likely change in the Sun’s output will not have a big impact on global temperatures or do much to slow the warming we expect from greenhouse gases.<\/p>\n Continued here<\/a> <\/p><\/blockquote>\n and<\/p>\n 4 January 2012 – 2012 is expected to be around 0.48 \u00c2\u00b0C warmer than the long-term (1961-1990) global average of 14.0 \u00c2\u00b0C, with a predicted likely range of between 0.34 \u00c2\u00b0C and 0.62 \u00c2\u00b0C, according to the Met Office annual global temperature forecast.<\/p>\n The middle of this range would place 2012 within the top 10 warmest years in a series which goes back to 1850.<\/p>\n The prediction follows provisional figures published by the Met Office and University of East Anglia last month which showed that 2011 saw temperatures 0.36 \u00c2\u00b0C above the long term average and is currently ranked the 11th warmest year on record in the HadCRUT3 temperature dataset.<\/p>\n At the same time the World Meteorological Organization published a global average temperature anomaly of 0.41 deg C based on an average of the three international global average temperature datasets1.<\/p>\n Both the global average temperature value from HadCRUT3 and the WMO falls within the range predicted by the Met Office for 2011 of between 0.28 \u00c2\u00b0C and 0.60 \u00c2\u00b0C, with a most likely value of 0.44 \u00c2\u00b0C above the long term average. This is consistent with the Met Office forecast which indicated that 2011 was unlikely to be a record year.<\/p>\n source<\/a>\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n What the Daily Mail said:<\/p>\n The supposed ‘consensus’ on man-made global warming is facing an inconvenient challenge after the release of new temperature data showing the planet has not warmed for the past 15 years. Meanwhile, leading climate scientists yesterday told The Mail on Sunday that, after emitting unusually high levels of energy throughout the 20th Century, the sun is now heading towards a ‘grand minimum’ in its output, threatening cold summers, bitter winters and a shortening of the season available for growing food.<\/p>\n Solar output goes through 11-year cycles, with high numbers of sunspots seen at their peak. Analysis by experts at NASA and the University of Arizona – derived from magnetic-field measurements 120,000 miles beneath the sun’s surface – suggest that Cycle 25, whose peak is due in 2022, will be a great deal weaker still.<\/p>\n According to a paper issued last week by the Met Office, there is a 92 per cent chance that both Cycle 25 and those taking place in the following decades will be as weak as, or weaker than, the ‘Dalton minimum’ of 1790 to 1830. In this period, named after the meteorologist John Dalton, average temperatures in parts of Europe fell by 2C.<\/p>\n Read more: http:\/\/www.dailymail.co.uk\/sciencetech\/article-2093264\/Forget-global-warming–Cycle-25-need-worry-NASA-scientists-right-Thames-freezing-again.html#ixzz1ktG5Eysv<\/p>\n continued<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n I haven’t seen the original research report, but then again, neither has David Rose of the Daily Mail, it would appear. Given the British Love of Libel Tourism I won’t say that David Rose is a big fat liar and should not be taken seriously as a journalist. I’ll let you be the judge of that! <\/a><\/p>\n Here’s another post <\/a>examining the Daily Mail nonsense.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Since the Daily Mail is a British thing and the latest form of entertainment in Britain is Libel Tourism, I won’t say to you that the Daily Mail is a rag full of lies and deceit. Instead, I’ll let you be the judge. These studies: Decline in solar output unlikely to offset global warming 23 … Continue reading New British Studies Confirms Climate Change Consensus, Daily Mail Gets It Totally Wrong<\/span>
\nForget global warming – it’s Cycle 25 we need to worry about (and if NASA scientists are right the Thames will be freezing over again)<\/strong><\/p>\n
\nThe figures suggest that we could even be heading for a mini ice age to rival the 70-year temperature drop that saw frost fairs held on the Thames in the 17th Century.
\nBased on readings from more than 30,000 measuring stations, the data was issued last week without fanfare by the Met Office and the University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit. It confirms that the rising trend in world temperatures ended in 1997….<\/p>\n
\nWe are now at what should be the peak of what scientists call ‘Cycle 24’ – which is why last week’s solar storm resulted in sightings of the aurora borealis further south than usual. But sunspot numbers are running at less than half those seen during cycle peaks in the 20th Century.<\/p>\n