<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>middle east &#8211; Greg Laden&#039;s Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/tag/middle-east/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2017 21:29:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">77525483</site>	<item>
		<title>Birds of Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East: New Field Guide</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2017/03/09/birds-of-europe-north-africa-and-the-middle-east-new-field-guide/</link>
					<comments>https://gregladen.com/blog/2017/03/09/birds-of-europe-north-africa-and-the-middle-east-new-field-guide/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2017 21:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Bird books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birdwatching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books-Birds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[field guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[middle east]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Asia]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=23781</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Just got my copy of Birds of Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East: A Photographic Guide by Frédéric Jiguet and Aurélien Audevard. This is the first and only field-ready photographic bird guide that covers every species in Europe. There are 2,200 photos covering 860 species. The West Asian and North African coverage is of &#8230; <a href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2017/03/09/birds-of-europe-north-africa-and-the-middle-east-new-field-guide/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Birds of Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East: New Field Guide</span> <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just got my copy of <a target="_blank" href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0691172439/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;creativeASIN=0691172439&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;tag=grlasbl0a-20&#038;linkId=3f643d3df94b857f67a71c566200a27c">Birds of Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East: A Photographic Guide</a><img decoding="async" src="//ir-na.amazon-adsystem.com/e/ir?t=grlasbl0a-20&#038;l=am2&#038;o=1&#038;a=0691172439" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" /> by Frédéric Jiguet and Aurélien Audevard.</p>
<p>This is the first and only field-ready photographic bird guide that covers every species in Europe.  There are 2,200 photos covering 860 species.  The West Asian and North African coverage is of all of the species there that have occurred in Europe, so think of this primarily as a European guide.</p>
<p><figure id="attachment_23782" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-23782" style="width: 300px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://i0.wp.com/scienceblogs.com/gregladen/files/2017/03/Screen-Shot-2017-03-09-at-3.28.01-PM.png"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" src="https://i0.wp.com/scienceblogs.com/gregladen/files/2017/03/Screen-Shot-2017-03-09-at-3.28.01-PM-300x410.png?resize=300%2C410" alt="The entry for the Mute Swan." width="300" height="410" class="size-medium wp-image-23782" data-recalc-dims="1" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-23782" class="wp-caption-text">The entry for the Mute Swan.</figcaption></figure>I hasten to add and emphasize. These are not your grandaddy&#8217;s photographs.  Many photographic guides have pretty nice looking photographs that show a bird, but then, when you go look up the bird you saw, you quickly discover that many of the best guides (such as this one) are not photographic, but rather, follow the Peterson/Pedrides tradition of drawings designed to help in identification.  Jiguet and Aedevard use photographs that are then enhanced and set in a non-photographic background or matrix, so they end up looking, and acting, a lot more like the drawings. This means that key features are indicated and notated.</p>
<p>Critically important in this guide is the ratio between the above mentioned numbers. For every species, there are potentially several photographs. Sometimes, it is male and female. Some other morphological categories are illustrated. For some birds, especially raptors, there may be numerous views in flight.</p>
<p>The amount of information give per bird is minimal (this is a field guid) and the range maps are classic style and well done.  Some books have dozens of pages of front matter, but this book has almost none. Other than the index and credits, there is no back matter.  Yet, the book is well over 400 pages long. That&#8217;s a lot of birds in one book.  If you want a European bird guide for the field, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0691172439/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;creativeASIN=0691172439&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;tag=grlasbl0a-20&#038;linkId=63d62f7b9d50b7ee00b5252d8abbd056">this is the one</a><img decoding="async" src="//ir-na.amazon-adsystem.com/e/ir?t=grlasbl0a-20&#038;l=am2&#038;o=1&#038;a=0691172439" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" />.</p>
<p>About the authors:</p>
<blockquote><p>Frédéric Jiguet is one of France&#8217;s leading ornithologists and a conservation biologist at the Muséum National d&#8217;Histoire Naturelle in Paris. He is director of the Centre de Recherches sur la Biologie des Populations d&#8217;Oiseaux (CRBPO), and serves on the editorial board of France&#8217;s premier bird-study journal, Ornithos. Aurélien Audevard has been studying birds for much of his life and has conducted several high-profile conservation studies for the Ligue pour la Protection des Oiseaux, Provence-Alpes-Côte d&#8217;Azur (LPO PACA). His photographs have appeared in many of Europe&#8217;s leading birding magazines, including Ornithos, L&#8217;Oiseaux, Birding World, and Dutch Birding.</p></blockquote>
<p>TABLE OF CONTENTS:</p>
<p>Introduction 6<br />
Species descriptions 12<br />
Swans 12<br />
Geese 14<br />
Shelducks 21<br />
Dabbling ducks 22<br />
Whistling ducks 28<br />
Diving ducks 28<br />
Sea ducks 34<br />
Stifftails 41<br />
Vagrant and exotic ducks 42<br />
Gamebirds 45<br />
Divers (Loons) 55<br />
Grebes 58<br />
Shearwaters and petrels 61<br />
Storm-petrels 66<br />
Rare petrels and albatrosses 67<br />
Frigatebirds 75<br />
Tropicbirds 76<br />
Gannets and boobies 77<br />
Pelicans 80<br />
Cormorants 81<br />
Herons, bitterns and egrets 83<br />
Storks 93<br />
Spoonbills and ibises 94<br />
Spoonbills and storks 96<br />
Flamingos 97<br />
Honey-buzzards 99<br />
Buzzards 101<br />
Snake eagles 105<br />
Kites 106<br />
Vultures 108<br />
Harriers 113<br />
Eagles 117<br />
Osprey and Black-shouldered Kite 126<br />
Accipiters 127<br />
Falcons 129<br />
Rails, crakes and gallinules 137<br />
Cranes 143<br />
Bustards 145<br />
Oystercatcher and Turnstone 148<br />
Stilts and avocets 149<br />
Stone-curlews and coursers 150<br />
Pratincoles 151<br />
Plovers and lapwings 153<br />
Sandpipers 162<br />
Woodcocks and snipes 173<br />
Dowitchers and Upland Sandpiper 176<br />
Godwits 177<br />
Curlews 178<br />
Larger sandpipers 180<br />
Phalaropes 185<br />
Skuas (Jaegers) 187<br />
Gulls 190<br />
Terns 211<br />
Auks 222<br />
Sandgrouse 227<br />
Pigeons and doves 229<br />
Parakeets 234<br />
Cuckoos 235<br />
Owls 238<br />
Nightjars 246<br />
Swifts 248<br />
Contents<br />
Kingfishers 251<br />
Rollers 253<br />
Bee-eaters 254<br />
Hoopoe 255<br />
Woodpeckers 256<br />
Larks 262<br />
Swallows and martins 269<br />
Pipits 274<br />
Wagtails 279<br />
Accentors 284<br />
Wren and Dipper 286<br />
Robins and chats 287<br />
Redstarts 291<br />
Stonechats 295<br />
Wheatears 298<br />
Rock thrushes 303<br />
Thrushes 304<br />
Bush warblers and cisticolas 311<br />
Grasshopper warblers 312<br />
Reed warblers 315<br />
Tree warblers 320<br />
Sylvia warblers 324<br />
Leaf warblers 333<br />
Crests 341<br />
Old World flycatchers 343<br />
Tyrant flycatchers 348<br />
Penduline tit and leiothrix 350<br />
Reedling and parrotbill 351<br />
Long-tailed tit 352<br />
Tits 353<br />
Nuthatches 358<br />
Treecreepers 360<br />
Wallcreeper and Golden Oriole 361<br />
Shrikes 362<br />
Crows and jays 370<br />
Starlings 377<br />
Waxwings 379<br />
Bulbuls and mynas 381<br />
Sparrows 382<br />
Introduced exotic finches 386<br />
Finches 389<br />
Buntings 404<br />
Vagrant Nearctic passerines 417<br />
New World warblers 433<br />
Index 434<br />
Photographic credits 444</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://gregladen.com/blog/2017/03/09/birds-of-europe-north-africa-and-the-middle-east-new-field-guide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">23781</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Political Sea Change</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/09/17/a-political-sea-change/</link>
					<comments>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/09/17/a-political-sea-change/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[middle east]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romney]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=13455</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yeah, I&#8217;m bringing back the term &#8220;Sea Change&#8221; which was briefly popular a few years ago, in reference to the perception of party difference, the difference between Democrats and Republicans, in handling foreign policy. Let me say first that it has never been true that the Republicans were better at handling foreign policy than the &#8230; <a href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/09/17/a-political-sea-change/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">A Political Sea Change</span> <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;m bringing back the term &#8220;Sea Change&#8221; which was briefly popular a few years ago, in reference to the perception of party difference, the difference between Democrats and Republicans, in handling foreign policy.  Let me say first that it has never been true that the Republicans were better at handling foreign policy than the Democrats. Individual presidents and individual congresses (if that term is appropriate) have varied a lot, and it could be that one party is not better than another.  Having said that, I think Democrats have been better over recent decades, more or less. Imagine, if you will, George Bush Jr. in charge instead of JFK during the Cuban Missile Crisis.  OK, now that you&#8217;ve thought about this for a second, throw some cold water on your face and calm down.  It didn&#8217;t happen, we&#8217;re OK.  Now, consider the most reviled of the Democratic presidents, Jimmy Carter.  Count the number of bombs dropped or missiles fired by the Carter-Mondale administration.  Zero.  Now think about Clinton&#8217;s administration.  Most people are unaware these days (or even then) of the slug-fest between Al Qaida and the US, and more specifically, really, Osama bin Laden and Bill Clinton.  First, there was George HW Bush who let al Qaida operate in the US to the extent that a few weeks into the Clinton Administration, Osama bombe the world trade center.  Meanwhile, George HW Bush had pushed us into a sensless occupation on Somalia.  Clinton eventually disentangled us from Somalia, undoing the Republican Mistake, and then, Clinton kept Osama on the run for 8 years, forcing him first to move the the Sudan, then out of the Sudan (remember the baby food factory?) and having his navy address on the ground regular attacks from Yemen. Clinton also worked with the international community to contain Saddam, and Clinton basically solved the problems in Eastern Europe working with NATO. When Clinton left the White House, that allowed Al Qaida to operate freely again in the US, and that is when the second World Trade Center attack, and the Pentagon attack happened.  Remember back to Reagan, the greatest of the Republican Presidents (according to some). Remember Operation Fury against Granada? Senseless showmanship designed to cover up a major foreign policy blunder is not good statespersonship. And that blunder, the Lebanon excursion, was one of the greatest shorter-term foreign policy blunders of the 20th century.  A few years later, Reagan&#8217;s administration made up a fake attack on the US and responded by bombing Libya.  Stop for a moment and consider the difference between Reagan&#8217;s messing around in Libya and what President Obama managed there.  Some day we should have a contest to define the most appropriate metaphor to describer that difference, it could be fun.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mnprogressiveproject.com/diary/12160/foreign-policy-is-now-a-democratic-issue">Eric Ferguson has written a piece</a> that fills us in on the last few years, comparing President Obama with the Republicans, and focusing on September 11th.  But not <em>that</em> September 11th, rather, Romney&#8217;s Meltdown.  Eric makes the point that it is now more than ever plausible to assume that when it comes to foreign policy, Republicans suck and Democrats do pretty well, and more importantly, that public perception is moving in that direction. He provides evidence from polls and from an analysis of Romney&#8217;s Meltdown to show that a Sea Change is likely occurring after which the argument that having an &#8220;R&#8221; next to your name is not equivalent to having an impressive resume on foreign policy.  Indeed, it may well indicate the opposite.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;when Romney denounced Obama for expressing sympathy for the attackers who killed someone at our Benghazi consulate (the numbers and identity were then unknown), which Obama didn&#8217;t of course, he showed how grotesquely unfit he is to handle foreign policy or international crises. He reinforced the impression he made when he screwed up so much in Britain that a conservative newspaper called him &#8220;Mitt the Twit&#8221; on its front page, when he said Israel is doing better economically better than the Palestinian territories because of a superior culture and ignored the occupation, and when he publicly criticized the Obama administration for handing a dissident back to China when they were actually negotiating to bring him to the US.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.mnprogressiveproject.com/diary/12160/foreign-policy-is-now-a-democratic-issue">Read Eric&#8217;s piece here,</a> and therein you will find links to interesting polls and a recent timeline of events.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/09/17/a-political-sea-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">13455</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
