<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Google docs &#8211; Greg Laden&#039;s Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/tag/google-docs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 16:59:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">77525483</site>	<item>
		<title>What Apple, Microsoft and the Rest of Them Don’t Get</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/09/29/what-apple-microsoft-and-the-rest-of-them-dont-get/</link>
					<comments>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/09/29/what-apple-microsoft-and-the-rest-of-them-dont-get/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 16:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Google docs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ios6 map app]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small business computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=13563</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Apple, Microsoft, Dell, IBM, Google, all of them &#8230; the companies that make the hardware and software we use &#8230; are, it would seem, ignorant, probably willfully so, of an important thing. We use their hardware and software in our work. Many individuals are like miniature institutions or corporations. Our HR department, our payroll department, &#8230; <a href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/09/29/what-apple-microsoft-and-the-rest-of-them-dont-get/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">What Apple, Microsoft and the Rest of Them Don’t Get</span> <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple, Microsoft, Dell, IBM, Google, all of them &#8230; the companies that make the hardware and software we use &#8230; are, it would seem, ignorant, probably willfully so, of an important thing.  We use their hardware and software in our work.  Many individuals are like miniature institutions or corporations.  Our HR department, our payroll department, our accounting department, our R&amp;D department, our car pool, and everything consists of a handful of machines (a car, a desktop, a mobile device, a printer) and a single person to staff them all (you, me, whatever).  We do quite a bit to implement hardware and software combinations that do the things we need.  We have an address book, a way to use a phone, a file storage system, we install and maintain software to produce documents, keep track of numbers do other stuff. And we use the readily available standard hardware and software to do this, thinking all along that this is a good idea.</p>
<p>Now, I’m going to give you two scenarios, one imagined one real, to underscore why this is a huge problem.  These two scenarios have very different meanings, and I’ll let you work that out. <span id="more-13563"></span></p>
<p>Scenario 1 (false, but something like it could happen): Almost everyone is using the software produced by a single large corporation for much of their needs.  For example, Microsoft Office is being used by most individuals who run businesses for documents, spreadsheets, data management, communications, etc.  Then, one day, a Vice President at that large software company convinces the marketing department that there would be a great deal of positive publicity if they started to integrate a Holiday Celebration mode in their office suite, so that every document produced, including emails, would be linked to a template and the template would celebrate the current holiday.  They also decide that launching this as a surprise would be fun, and they start with Easter.  So, suddenly, without warning, every single document produced by a large number of us, starting on Good Friday and running through Sunday, has an easter bunny and a drawing of some bearded guy suspended, dead, on an ancient Roman torture device and he has a halo.  Letters sent by the consultant working on a Mideast Peace mission for the United Nations representing an Israeli concern, being sent to the PLO have Jesus Christ on the Cross, and a bunny, on every one of them, for example.  This would obviously cause problems, and it would be an entirely inappropriate decision on the part of the software company.</p>
<p>Scenario 2 (really happened, names obscured to protect the innocent): About 30 years ago, a reasonably large government agency was involved in negotiations to transfer a large parcel of valuable urban land, via a 100 year lease, from that agency’s use as a parking lot to a different agency’s use as contribution to building a sports stadium.  In other words, a parking lot sitting in the middle of a downtown district being rehabilitated would get a new hotel and sports stadium built on it, as the center piece of that rehabilitation.  Said agency had the last access to the critically important legal documents to allow this to happen, the team of lawyers made the final changes, the agency staff and director carefully went over every word of the document, then it was photocopied on a new fancy photocopy machine leased form a major hardware provider that I’m sure you’ve heard of.</p>
<p>About every ten pages, though, a two-line high strip of the sheet at a random location would not copy, but instead, be blank space. And, as it turns out, the only effect this had on the legal documents was to delete a very important sentence from the end of a very important paragraph, without any evidence that this ever happened.  The missing data was noticed in a final proof read, a critically important meeting was postponed, the contracts shredded, and new photocopies made but this time with the paper oriented 90 degrees (the copier was capable of this) so that missing data would show up as a vertical stripe up and down the page, and those pages could be replaced.  It was a mess.  The executive director of the agency had the reps from the photocopy company in his office the next day and at the same time had his employees move all the machines in all of the agency’s buildings outside next to the nearest dumpster.  The reps were instructed to pick the machines up and later, when a new contact for new hardware was arranged, all the machines were fitted with a warning. Other bad things happened to the photocopy company because of this incident.</p>
<p>Oh, what the heck, I might as well add a third scenario:  The Map app that came with Apple’s IOS 6. Say no more.</p>
<p>Oh, and just so you know that I’m not being anti-Apple here, I’ll add two more: Unity, and every upgrade to Windows by Microsoft. These are all examples of changes done entirely for marketing reasons and that break current workflow.</p>
<p>When one sets up one’s hardware and software, one imagines efficiency.  One imagines effectiveness.  One imagines cool-ness.</p>
<p>One imagines sitting at one’s computer, and you get a call from an associate&#8230;</p>
<p>“We need such a such a thing to happen, can you make that happen? Now? Or we’re dead.”</p>
<p>And you start clicking on the keyboard and swiping the mouse around on your desk. Windows open on your computer and information flashes across them.  Other windows open as still others close, various documents are accessed and various information flows form one bit of software to another.  Within a minute or so emails with attachments are flying through Tubes on the Internet to far flung and important places and they make things happen.  Nobody dies today.  You kicked ass.</p>
<p>But what really happens is this.  You’ve got everything pretty much working.  For collaborative reasons, you are using Google Docs.  You get that phone call.  You go to open Google Docs and Google stops you. It wants you to upgrade your security questions.  What was the name of your first dog? It wants to know the name of your fucking first dog.  You never had a dog.  You need to get to the documents, to make things fly through the intertubes.  You open up another web site and it seems to have forgotten that you had clicked the “remember me” button and you have to log in again. What was that password? Meanwhile you flip open your laptop and turn it on, only to discover that it has chosen this moment to scan the entire hard drive for errors.  Once that is done, the system starts an automatic upgrade and you need to reboot it three times.  Meanwhile one of the pieces of software you usually use, that you need to access right now to get some data, has stopped working because it conflicts with some time-saving application you installed yesterday.  Just then, when you open the document you’ve been working on for three days and go to turn it into a PDF file, you discover that your word processing software can’t handle files over 35 megabytes in size, your email system will not send them, and you can’t upload them to your web site because the arbitrary limit on document size set by the server is 10 megs.  So all the work you did in preparation for this sudden emergency kick-ass deployment simply can not be used, sent, or accessed at all by anyone.</p>
<p>And that is when you realize the truth: The hardware and software you are using is a toy.</p>
<p>The hardware you get to use, and the software you get to use, as a mere “end user” (the EU in the EULA), as distinct from a company that produces much of its own software, has an IT department, and never upgrades or changes anything until it has been tested out&#8230;the hardware and software you get to use&#8230;is a toy, and in fact, not a very good toy.  And the purveyors of that hardware and software do not seem to understand, or even know about, the possibility that you use their products for real live grown up stuff.</p>
<p>This is what the boneheads a Microsoft, Apple, Google, Dell, IBM, the rest of them, have produced for us.  Quirky toys that don’t work when you need them to work.</p>
<p>Why is that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/09/29/what-apple-microsoft-and-the-rest-of-them-dont-get/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">13563</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft: So evil it can make smart people stupid</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/07/13/microsoft-so-evil-it-can-make/</link>
					<comments>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/07/13/microsoft-so-evil-it-can-make/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[free software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google docs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenSource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/07/13/microsoft-so-evil-it-can-make/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[CNN is supposed to be a professional news outlet. But even the editors and writers at CNN&#8217;s Fortune desk are no match for Microsoft&#8217;s&#8217; Stupid-Ray Gun. This piece is virtually giddy about the fact that the next version of Microsoft Office will be just like Google Office. Free and on line . Now, think about &#8230; <a href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/07/13/microsoft-so-evil-it-can-make/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Microsoft: So evil it can make smart people stupid</span> <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNN is supposed to be a professional news outlet.  But even the editors and writers at CNN&#8217;s Fortune desk are no match for Microsoft&#8217;s&#8217; Stupid-Ray Gun.</p>
<p><a href="http://bigtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/07/13/microsoft-office-to-go-online-for-free/">This piece is virtually giddy</a> about the fact that the next version of Microsoft Office will be just like Google Office.  Free and on line .</p>
<p>Now, think about that for five seconds and imagine yourself to be a writer for CNN.  Do you actually believe that Microsoft Office is going to be available for free?  Like, me, Greg Laden, can just decide &#8220;Oh, I&#8217;ve had enough of Google Docs &#8230; I&#8217;m going to switch to the online version of Microsoft Office instead.  It&#8217;s free!!!&#8221; &#8230; and then I sign up for an account and I have this on line free service and no money has changed hands?</p>
<p>If you believe that, I&#8217;ve got a bridge over some swamp land in Florida that comes with it&#8217;s own Nigerian Bank account that I&#8217;d love to sell you.</p>
<p><span id="more-5835"></span><br />
From the CNN piece, which was obviously either written by a moron or a paid Microsoft consultant:</p>
<blockquote><p>Get this: Microsoft &#8211; the king of paid software &#8211; will announce today that it is going to give a version of Office away for free online. Both the online and desktop versions are scheduled to arrive in the first half of next year. Yes, you read that right. The latest version of its ubiquitous productivity software, dubbed Office 2010, will come as both a piece of software you can buy for your computer, and as a service you can access in your browser.<br />
<a href="http://bigtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/07/13/microsoft-office-to-go-online-for-free/">source</a>
</p></blockquote>
<p>A little unclear on the concept of making it clear.</p>
<p>So, to make it clear: If you PURCHASE (with money) Microsoft Office, then you will under certain conditions be allowed to use a scaled down version of a subset of Office features in a browser.</p>
<p>Gee, I wonder which browser this wonderful new on line service will be compatible with?  I wonder which browser it will work with?  (Answer:  IE and Firefox, respectively.) [update: The most recent information from M$ says that their software will &#8220;support&#8221; Firefox and Safari as well as IE.  Expect &#8230;. expected features.]</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/261430/everything-you-need-to-know-about-microsoft-office-2010.html">There are some details here. </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/07/13/microsoft-so-evil-it-can-make/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">5835</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Computer Security, A Bug in Google Docs(?), and Norm Coleman Is a Ghoulish Skeletal Idiot</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/03/13/computer-security-a-bug-in-goo/</link>
					<comments>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/03/13/computer-security-a-bug-in-goo/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 08:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Computer Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google docs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norm Coleman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/03/13/computer-security-a-bug-in-goo/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8230;. Not to pick on Norm&#8217;s physical appearance or anything, but those of use who find his continued existence in Minnesota politics both enigmatic and unconscionable (for us, for allowing it) are starting to see him like that. Anyway, somebody who is too busy to blog sent me this interesting item: Wikileaks comes back at &#8230; <a href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/03/13/computer-security-a-bug-in-goo/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Computer Security, A Bug in Google Docs(?), and Norm Coleman Is a Ghoulish Skeletal Idiot</span> <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;. Not to pick on Norm&#8217;s physical appearance or anything, but those of use who find his continued existence in Minnesota politics both enigmatic and unconscionable (for us, for allowing it) are starting to see him like that.  Anyway, <a href="http://tuibguy.com/?p=190">somebody who is too busy to blog</a> sent me this interesting item:  <a href="http://blogs.twincities.com/politics/2009/03/wikileaks_comes_back_at_colema.html">Wikileaks comes back at Coleman on donor database exposure.  </a>The long and the short of it:  <strong>Norm Coleman&#8217;s campaign donor database</strong>, including such interesting items as name and credit card number,<strong> became internet-visible a couple of months back.</strong>  Since that time, this error was exposed, and Norm Coleman decided to blame the Franken campaing and/or other forces of supposed evil for causing the mistake, or exploiting the causing of the release, or whatever.  Additionally, the Coleman campaign has pretty clearly violated the law (which is not surprising given Coleman&#8217;s alleged <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2008/11/hey_norm_what_about_this_6.php">long</a> <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2008/11/hey_norm_what_about_this_5.php">history</a> of being a self <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2008/11/hey_norm_what_about_this.php">absorbed</a> misogynous racist <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2008/11/hey_norm_what_about_this_1.php">renegade</a> <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2008/11/hey_norm_what_about_this_1.php">bastard</a>, allegedly) by not reporting the release as required.  By law.<br />
<strong><br />
The bug in google docs &#8230;. </strong>I&#8217;m not sure if I can reproduce this or not, but &#8230; If you use the Google Docs spelling tool (which I&#8217;ve used only this one time) and leave a bunch of words misspelled (because they really aren&#8217;t misspelled, perhaps) then turn off the tool, then copy and paste the text into, say, a web-form box somewhere, then the spaces that existed before the word (as the text flows) may disappear.</p>
<p>We had a computer security seminar yesterday at which our unit-local IT boss discussed security issues with various unit heads, staff, and so on.  He&#8217;s a great guy and really know his stuff, even if he does think Windows is OK. (Or maybe it&#8217;s just the chip making him think that, I dunno.)  Anyway, the idea that nefarious operatives with radios could listen in on your wife, or even your wireless keyboard, was brought up and discussed.  That may seem a little extreme to worry about (but it is not, actually) however it turns out that it is WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT!!!</p>
<blockquote><p>That PC keyboard you&#8217;re using may be giving away your passwords. Researchers say they&#8217;ve discovered new ways to read what you&#8217;re typing by aiming special wireless or laser equipment at the keyboard or by simply plugging into a nearby electrical socket.</p></blockquote>
<p>And no, we are not talking about wireless keyboards here. <a href="http://www.itworld.com/security/64193/researchers-find-ways-sniff-keystrokes-thin-air">Details here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/03/13/computer-security-a-bug-in-goo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">4783</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
