<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>efe &#8211; Greg Laden&#039;s Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/tag/efe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 15:29:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">77525483</site>	<item>
		<title>What a Difference a Century Can Make</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/03/01/what-a-difference-a-century-can-make-2/</link>
					<comments>https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/03/01/what-a-difference-a-century-can-make-2/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 15:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lost congo memoir]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zaire]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=16036</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[At the beginning of the 20th century, a traveler in Central Africa made mention of some strange people that he had come across. He was traveling among regular, run-of-the-mill natives…probably Bantu-speaking people living in scattered villages and farming for their food. But along the way, strange people came out of the forest. These strange people &#8230; <a href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/03/01/what-a-difference-a-century-can-make-2/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">What a Difference a Century Can Make</span> <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the beginning of the 20th century, a traveler in Central Africa made mention of some strange people that he had come across. He was traveling among regular, run-of-the-mill natives…probably Bantu-speaking people living in scattered villages and farming for their food. But along the way, strange people came out of the forest. These strange people had sloping foreheads; they were short of stature, bow-legged and otherwise misshapen. They also clearly were, in the eyes of the traveler, of subhuman intelligence. The traveler described these people as a separate, subhuman race that lived in the forest. As I read this, I began to think that perhaps he was speaking of so-called “Pygmies” who live in this region, and as I began to think that, I started to get mad at this writer because so-called “Pygmies” do not look or act as he described.<span id="more-16036"></span></p>
<p>Then, the writer totally surprised me by noting (I paraphrase) that “unlike the Pygmies, who live in these forests and are of perfectly proportioned shape and appearance, these subhuman creatures were rather grotesque.”<br />
The traveler was a college-educated westerner with a late-Victorian attitude about Africans. The idea that all Africans are at least a little subhuman would have been a starting point for him. Throwing in a tribe here and there with especially cannibalistic or otherwise uncouth tendencies would be typical. Running into a group of individuals that looked to him almost like a separate species would be notable, and he did in fact make note of it, but this would be something he would take in stride.</p>
<p>Reading this made me wonder about two totally different and to some extent opposed lines of thought. On one hand, I thought, “How can people think such things are real…this guy was obviously seeing something he expected to see. Why? How does that work?” On the other hand, I thought, “What if his observations were essentially accurate, aside from the racial judgments he made. What if he really did encounter a bunch of people with bow legs and funny-looking bodies?”<br />
Then, in the next paragraph of this monologue, a possible answer came. Shortly after the above mentioned description, the traveler mentions that one of these strange heathens, with the bow legs and the disproportioned body, traveled with him as a servant for a while. Then, at the end of that leg of the trip, after serving quite well for being such a subhuman and all, the traveler wanted to leave this misshapen wretch with some sort of extra payment for services. A tip. But the wretch had withdrawn to the forest never to be seen again (by the traveller), apparently uninterested in recompense.<br />
Bingo.</p>
<p>Or at least, maybe bingo. I have an experience that may in fact match that of this ca. 1900-vintage traveler. Actually, a few such experiences. But as a post- (way post!) Victorian anthropologist, I have a slightly different take on the situation.</p>
<p>When I lived in the Ituri Forest, I often lived with the Pygmies for stretches of time. There were two modalities of living with them. In one mode, I would throw myself on their mercy and more or less live exactly as they lived, staying in the same kind of hut they lived in and doing whatever they did, or at least watching them do whatever they were doing, and trying to stay out of the way at the same time as observing and learning things about their lifeway. In the other modality, I stayed in a small dome tent (a cloth version of their hut) and was a bit more involved with the logistics of camp life, because during at least some of that time (several weeks over the course of many many months), it was more like they were living with me. I would hire a small number of Pygmy men, and maybe have one villager with us as well, and another anthropologist, and we’d be doing something like digging an archaeological site, measuring trees, counting monkeys, or whatever.</p>
<p>During some of these forays, especially in the first modality when it was only me (no other anthropologist) travelling with them, and I was living in their lifeway, more or less, I was assigned a wife. Sort of. This happened a couple of times, with different groups, and different individuals. In each case the person whom I eventually came to understand was serving the role of Mrs. Gregoiri (one of my Efe names was Gregoiri, which I admit is not too original) was a man with pretty severe polio.</p>
<p>These were men who could not carry out many of the activities in which the men normally engaged with respect to hunting and other forest activities. Even moving from camp to camp might be a challenge to someone whose legs were very shortened and deformed and who had, essentially, a kind of polio-induced dwarfism. For the most part, these men had outstanding manual skills. They could shoot an arrow as well as any (or better) and were outstanding at making things that the other men also made, but that the polio-afflicted men would make with utmost skill. What they lacked was stamina in the field.<br />
Their condition meant that they would be unlikely to marry. It meant that they would be in camp with the women anywhere from now and then to almost always as the men went off to hunt. It meant that their social and economic gender was unique. And it meant that when someone had to be assigned to keep the big pasty white guy who was always tripping on tree roots and poking himself with sticks from harming himself, well, this person was the obvious choice.</p>
<p>I remembered, rather poignantly in fact, on reading the aforementioned traveler’s notice that the strange deformed subhuman left without any special recompense, that this is what happened to me as well. It was a bit of a privilege to hang out with the visitor, as would be the case in most cultures, and the visitor seemed to overlook the person’s affliction, which is something that many visitors may not have done.</p>
<p>The polio that came through the Ituri Forest of Zaire must have come through at roughly the same time because all the men who had it were about the same age…my age, actually. This population of forest dwelling people must have been very susceptible to it. And the Pygmies were notable for either refusing or just being bad at accepting long-term treatment or hospital stays, so even if there was some help available for them in those days, it may have ended up rather ineffective. Many must have died.</p>
<p>I need not mention that I never saw a subhuman deformed race. I did see some men who were being very good to me, keeping me from getting killed by the snakes, the elements, by getting poked to death or falling off a cliff into quicksand, or whatever one may think of as the dangers of the African Jungle. And they didn’t want any special pay for it.<br />
Those marriages were short lived. But they were good marriages.</p>
<p>Originally posted at <a href="http://quichemoraine.com/2009/07/what-a-difference-a-century-can-make/">Quiche Moraine</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/03/01/what-a-difference-a-century-can-make-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">16036</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>King Leopold’s Soliloquy</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/02/28/king-leopolds-soliloquy-2/</link>
					<comments>https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/02/28/king-leopolds-soliloquy-2/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 15:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Efe Ethnoarchaeology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[King Leopold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lost congo memoir]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zaire]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=16023</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I first became aware of, and read, King Leopold&#8217;s Soliloquy, which is not his soliloquy but a parody of what he might say according to Samuel Clemens, while doing fieldwork in the ex-Belgian Congo. That is where the real story that inspired the essay took place. I lived in an area that at one time &#8230; <a href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/02/28/king-leopolds-soliloquy-2/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">King Leopold’s Soliloquy</span> <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I first became aware of, and read, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0717806871/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;creativeASIN=0717806871&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;tag=grlasbl0a-20&#038;linkId=91bd4a3db2387261510deb1664977f68">King Leopold&#8217;s Soliloquy</a><img decoding="async" src="//ir-na.amazon-adsystem.com/e/ir?t=grlasbl0a-20&#038;l=am2&#038;o=1&#038;a=0717806871" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" />, which is not his soliloquy but a parody of what he might say according to Samuel Clemens, while doing fieldwork in the ex-Belgian Congo. That is where the real story that inspired the essay took place.  I lived in an area that at one time had a few a plantations, but the plantations only existed briefly and are now long gone.  The &#8220;road&#8221; through this area was passable only with a very tenacious four wheel drive vehicle (we had a Land Rover) and grew worse every year.  But the road at one time was excellent.</p>
<p>I knew a guy, an older Efe Pygmy man, with one leg.  When I first arrived in the Ituri Forest I was shown by my colleague an abandoned camp that a group of Efe Pygmies has only recently been living in, and told &#8220;everyone in this group lived here but the old man and his wife &#8230; he&#8217;s a bit contentious and there was an argument.&#8221;  Having read all the literature written in English about Pygmies, I was aware of the fact that these foraging people, who moved frequently &#8212; perhaps ten times a year or more &#8212; would often change the composition of their residence groups to reflect forming and breaking alliances among people who often, but not always, lived together.  After hanging out in the camp long enough for my colleague to collect some data, we went back to the road via a different path and passed the old man, Kobou (pronounced &#8220;Ko-bo-oo&#8221;), and his wife in a small clearing in a freshly cut garden.  &#8220;Strange,&#8221; I thought, &#8220;They live in a square hut.  Everyone else lives in a dome-shaped hut.  I guess some Efe live in square huts.&#8221;</p>
<p>But no.  Kobou is the only Efe I ever came across to always build square huts. Maybe somewhere else in the Central African Rain Forest, but not around these parts.</p>
<p>Thin, old, bearded, fierce eyes contagious laugh and one leg.  Kobou<sup>1</sup> was the father of one of my main informants.  Kobou would come by the research base camp whenever I was there, more or less daily.  He&#8217;d sit in a chair and chill for a while, then we might chat about one thing or another. Then he&#8217;d say &#8220;I&#8217;ve come to get my plantains&#8221; or &#8220;I&#8217;ve come to get my mohogo&#8221; or &#8220;I&#8217;ve come to get my [fill in the blank with something to eat that we had growing in our fields]&#8221;.  The base camp did have a rather large garden, and the main purpose of the garden was so that Kobou and a handful of other Efe could come by now and then and claim some of the food.</p>
<p>&#8220;You&#8217;d better cut your plantains, then,&#8221; I&#8217;d say.</p>
<p><figure id="attachment_16031" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-16031" style="width: 272px" class="wp-caption alignright"><a href="https://i0.wp.com/scienceblogs.com/gregladen/files/2013/02/67340-1987-x-040-535x590.jpg"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" src="https://i0.wp.com/scienceblogs.com/gregladen/files/2013/02/67340-1987-x-040-535x590-272x300.jpg?resize=272%2C300" alt="Kobou and I hanging around in the Harvard Ituri Project base camp. " width="272" height="300" class="size-medium wp-image-16031" data-recalc-dims="1" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-16031" class="wp-caption-text">Kobou and I hanging around in the Harvard Ituri Project base camp.</figcaption></figure>More often than not he&#8217;d reply, &#8220;I did already,&#8221; pointing with his bearded chin to some big bunch of plantains at the edge of the clearing.  Then he&#8217;d speak to a child or other handy person in KiLese (the local language) and that person would drag the food over to Kobou.  Kobou would then pull out some vines he always seemed to have handy and create a tumpline strap or other carrying device incorporating the plantains or other food item, stand up on his one leg, grab one of his hand-fashioned canes, attach the food to himself, and grabbing the other cane head off to his camp.  Unless his wife was with him, then Mrs. Kobou would carry the food.</p>
<p>Kobou had lost his leg to a snake.  He had been bitten by a full grown Gabon Viper.  The Gabon Viper is one of the scariest of snakes.  It&#8217;s head is huge, it&#8217;s body very stout, and it&#8217;s venom is the richest venom known in a snake, both neurotoxic and haemotoxic.</p>
<p>When my friend was bitten by the snake, he was driven by someone from a nearby plantation to a hospital, to have is leg cut off, which was the only way to save his life.  In the days I lived there, this drive required many many hours (or a day or two), and would beat the hell out of the truck.  But in those days, they were able to drive him there in a few hours.  At 120 kpm, it would have been a two or three hour drive.</p>
<p>But the reason that the road was so good is because of the sort of policy satirized in <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1148505695/ref=as_li_tf_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;creativeASIN=1148505695&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;tag=wwwgregladenc-20">King Leopold&#8217;s Soliloquy</a><img decoding="async" src="https://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=wwwgregladenc-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=1148505695" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" />.  In those days, a Belgian Colonial Administrator would drive a vehicle at 100 kilometers per hour down this road with a glass of water on his dashboard.  Wherever water spilled form his full glass, he would stop, and his agents would beat and/or maim the nearest villagers.  This encouraged the villagers to keep the dirt road in perfect condition by constant attention to any rivulets or potholes, using hand labor and simple tools.</p>
<p>Eventually, the revolution came, in it&#8217;s own way, and the Belgians, guilty of a decades-long holocaust, got their due.  They were burned to death in the buildings they hid in, they were shot, strangled, and drowned, and a few got away.</p>
<p>At a later time, I stayed in one of King Leopold&#8217;s mansions.  Well, not really.  We kept some of our stuff in the mansion.  The mansion had no roof, and was filled with birds and bats, and their guano.  It was better to stay in a tent, outside, even though one would risk being trampled by a hippo or hassled by a hyena.  This was Ishango, known locally as &#8220;The Most Beautiful Place on the Earth.&#8221;  It is.  But they should really tear down those old mansions (Two stood there side by side) and neaten the place up just a little.  Leopold had mansions here and there across his Congo, though he never actually visited the place.</p>
<blockquote><p>I have ruled the Congo State not as a trustee of the Powers, an agent, a subordinate, a foreman, but as a sovereign &#8212; sovereign over a fruitful domain four times as large as the German Empire &#8212; sovereign absolute, irresponsible, above all law; trampling the Berlin-made Congo charter under foot; barring out all foreign traders but myself; restricting commerce to myself, through concessionaires who are my creatures and confederates; seizing and holding the State as my personal property, the whole of its vast revenues as my private &#8220;swag&#8221; &#8212; mine, solely mine &#8212; claiming and holding its millions of people as my private property, my serfs, my slaves; their labor mine, with or without wage; the food they raise not their property but mine; the rubber, the ivory and all the other riches of the land mine &#8212; mine solely &#8212; and gathered for me by the men, the women and the little children under compulsion of lash and bullet, fire, starvation, mutilation and the halter.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Leopold did not say that.  Clemens puts those words in his mouth as a political and social parody.  But it is absolutely accurate; had Leopold said those word he would have been speaking the truth.</p>
<hr />
<p><sup>1</sup>Here and elsewhere, when I write about people in the Congo, I use fake names. There are reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://gregladen.com/blog/2013/02/28/king-leopolds-soliloquy-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">16023</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is it appropriate to use the term &#034;Pygmy&#034; when speaking of&#8230;Pygmies?</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/08/05/is-it-appropriate-to-use-the-term-pygmy-when-speaking-of-pygmies/</link>
					<comments>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/08/05/is-it-appropriate-to-use-the-term-pygmy-when-speaking-of-pygmies/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 14:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anthropology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Efe Ethnoarchaeology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pygmy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zaire]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=13070</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Some of the people who live in the rain forest of Central Africa are known widely as &#8220;Pgymies.&#8221; That word&#8230;Pygmy&#8230;is considered problematic for a few different reasons. It refers to a person&#8217;s physical appearance, because it means &#8220;small.&#8221; The word is sometimes used in biology to refer to the smaller species among a group of &#8230; <a href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/08/05/is-it-appropriate-to-use-the-term-pygmy-when-speaking-of-pygmies/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Is it appropriate to use the term &#34;Pygmy&#34; when speaking of&#8230;Pygmies?</span> <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><figure id="attachment_13072" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-13072" style="width: 330px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://i0.wp.com/scienceblogs.com/gregladen/files/2012/08/Efe_Man_and_White_guy.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://i0.wp.com/scienceblogs.com/gregladen/files/2012/08/Efe_Man_and_White_guy.jpg?resize=330%2C387" alt="" title="Efe_Man_and_White_guy" width="330" height="387" class="size-full wp-image-13072" data-recalc-dims="1" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-13072" class="wp-caption-text">Left: Efe (Pygmy) man. Right: White guy. </figcaption></figure>Some of the people who live in the rain forest of Central Africa are known widely as &#8220;Pgymies.&#8221;  That word&#8230;Pygmy&#8230;is considered problematic for a few different reasons.  It refers to a person&#8217;s physical appearance, because it means &#8220;small.&#8221;  The word is sometimes used in biology to refer to the smaller species among a group of closely related species, as in &#8220;Pygmy Hippopotamus&#8221; or &#8220;Pygmy Chimp.&#8221;  In English and probably some other languages,  the term is used in a derogatory way to refer to someone who is perceived as not very smart, as in &#8220;Pygmy mind.&#8221;  Sometimes the word is simply used, as it is, as a non-specific derogatory word.  Someone might be called a &#8220;Pygmy&#8221; because by someone who does not like them.  Also, more of a distracting complexity than negative meaning, the term &#8220;Pygmy&#8221; is often misused to refer to a much larger number of different people around the world who happen to be dark skinned and short.  We see the term used for the Andaman Islands, in Papaua New Guinea and Australia, for example.  These a are some of the reasons the term is considered problematic.<span id="more-13070"></span></p>
<p>These problems may be overstated.  Referring to someone by a physical trait isn&#8217;t necessarily considered negative.  African Americans are Blacks and Euro-Americans are Whites.  But even in these contexts, these references to physical traits can be problematic, perhaps depending on what is meant or who uses the word. &#8220;Black is Beautiful&#8221; (you might have to be older to remember that phrase).  One of my best friends calls herself a &#8220;Black Girl.&#8221;  On the other hand, Donald Trump says he has &#8220;a great relationship with the Blacks&#8221; and when I&#8217;m in South Africa and I hear someone use the term &#8220;The Blacks&#8221; I become wary, because the next thing the person says may not be very nice. Still, it is not universally the case that a reference to physical features is negative.  (I should also mention that in Francophone contexts, &#8220;Pygmy&#8221; is considered superior to another term often used, &#8220;Negrito.&#8221;)</p>
<p>The term &#8220;Pygmy&#8221; as used in biology is unfortunate and also causes confusion.  I&#8217;ve met people who thought that &#8220;Pygmy hippos&#8221; were hippos that lived where Pygmies live, but ironically the pygmy hippos live in West Africa only and the Pygmy people live in Central Africa only.  I don&#8217;t want to go into some of the confusion I&#8217;ve encountered between &#8220;Pygmy chimps&#8221; and Pygmy people.  One way to solve this problem, of course, is to change the animal names.  These are common names (though the word &#8220;Pygmy&#8221; is sometimes the root for the Latin binomial which is harder to change) and they can be discarded or altered.  In fact, that has happened with the pygmy chimps, which are never called that any more for this reason (and the fact that they are not really smaller than regular chimps).  You probably know of them as bonobos.</p>
<p>The real problem is probably the use of the word &#8220;pygmy&#8221; as a derogatory term, including its use as a slur of someone&#8217;s intelligence.</p>
<p>This sort of problem is widespread.  There are many cases of people who&#8217;s &#8220;name&#8221; is somehow considered negative.  One of the more interesting examples is the term used to refer to the traditionally foraging people of southern Africa, including the Ju/&#8217;hoansi and Baswara people, but also many other groups.  The two terms of concern are &#8220;San&#8221; and &#8220;Bushmen.&#8221;  The former is said to be a negative term applied to these folks by their cattle keeping neighbors who looked down on them.  It may mean something like &#8220;wild.&#8221;  It is part of the phrase &#8220;Khoisan&#8221; which relates to the term &#8220;Khoi Khoi.&#8221;  Put simply, San are foragers and Khoi Khoi (or just Khoi) are herders, but otherwise the people referred to by these terms share languages and other aspects of their culture, and are physically similar.  Khoisan (Khoi+San) refers to all of these folks together.  (These terms are mainly South African and older, used in the 17th century and onwards and not used so much recently.)  The term &#8220;Bushmen&#8221; also means &#8220;wild&#8221; and that is considered an inappropriate term as well.</p>
<p>During the 1980s, when various anthropologists were working with groups of San/Bushmen in Namibia and Botswana to help them organize politically, they (the San/Bushmen) of that area decided to call themselves &#8220;Bushmen.&#8221;  There were two reasons for this. The primary reason is that the word &#8220;Bushmen&#8221; was widely known and they wanted to use a term that everyone would recognize as they strove for political and cultural recognition and improved status. The second reason is that by this time it was cool to be a Bushman.  Bushmen are Beautiful, if you will.  So Bushmen is the correct term in that area of Namibia and Botswana.  But, to the south in South Africa, the term &#8220;Bushman&#8221; never caught on among the politically thoughtful.  There, &#8220;San&#8221; was considered to be a better word.  Many of these folks adopted the term &#8220;San&#8221; in South Africa, while their distant relatives to the north eschewed the term. And that&#8217;s the simple version of the story.  There are many different cultural groups  with different languages living in different parts of Namibia, Botswana,  and South Africa who prefer their more local name such as Barwa or Sho or other terms.</p>
<p>So, in the case of the San/Bushmen (let your eyes settle on either of those words depending on if you are from Botswana or South Africa!) one part of the solution was to ask the people what they want.  This has been done with the Pygmies to some extent.  I did it myself.  I have had this conversation with Efe people on many occasions.  Efe is the term used, by themselves, for Pygmies that live in a certain part of the Ituri Forest in the Congo.  The Efe are both the largest and smallest Pygmies.  They live over a larger area of Africa than any other group, and there are probably more Efe than any other group of Pygmies.  Since Pygmy stature (they are indeed short) is of such great interest, every group of Pygmies has been repeatedly measured by anthropologists. So, we know that the Efe are the shortest of the Pygmies. Largest (in area) and smallest (in stature).</p>
<p>A local term for the Efe and other Pygmies of the Ituri is &#8220;Bambuti&#8221; (Singular: Mbuti).  The Pygmies that the famous anthropologist Colin Turnbull lived with and wrote about called themselves Mbuti, and they live to the south of the Efe, speak a different language, and have some other cultural differences.  Having said that, I did some work in the area of overlap between Efe and Mbuti and the distinction isn&#8217;t perfectly abrupt or consistent.  Anyway, the non-Efe people of the area often use the word &#8220;Bambuti&#8221; for the Efe (and the Mbuti) but some people consider &#8220;Bambuti&#8221; to be a little derogatory.  But not everyone thinks that.</p>
<p>The Efe I&#8217;ve spoken to know the term Pygmée (the French for Pygmy) and they don&#8217;t regard it as derogatory.  They never use that word to refer to themselves, however, which makes it inappropriate for local use.  The problem is, though, that just like the Ju/&#8217;hoansi of Namibia and Botswana recognized, if we want to speak of these folks in a broader context&#8211;in classrooms or among those interested in human rights in the area, etc.&#8211;we are forced to use the word Pygmy so people have a clue what we are talking about.  And, as far as I know, the Efe don&#8217;t particularly mind.</p>
<p>I suppose it is more important to be respectful than to speak respectfully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://gregladen.com/blog/2012/08/05/is-it-appropriate-to-use-the-term-pygmy-when-speaking-of-pygmies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">13070</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why shrews are interesting</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/07/27/why-shrews-are-interesting/</link>
					<comments>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/07/27/why-shrews-are-interesting/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Efe Ethnoarchaeology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insectivores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mammals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pygmies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shrews]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2011/07/27/why-shrews-are-interesting/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It has been said that our most distant primate ancestors, the mammal that gave rise to early primates but itself wasn&#8217;t quite a primate, was most like the Asian tree shrew, which is neither a shrew nor does it live in trees. This is, of course, untrue. When the average American sees a shrew native &#8230; <a href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/07/27/why-shrews-are-interesting/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Why shrews are interesting</span> <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has been said that our most distant primate ancestors, the mammal that gave rise to early primates but itself wasn&#8217;t quite a primate, was most like the Asian tree shrew, which is neither a shrew nor does it live in trees.  This is, of course, untrue.  When the average American sees a shrew native to the new world scurrying past, he or she usually thinks of it as a form of mouse.  Which it isn&#8217;t.  (In fact, there are no &#8220;mice&#8221; native to the new world, but even if we give our hypothetical observer the concept of &#8220;rodent&#8221; as in &#8220;eeek, a rodent&#8221; the shrew is not that either.)  If you spend any time hanging out with the <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/efe_ethnoarchaeology/">Efe</a> Pygmies of the <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/series/lost_congo_memoir/">Ituri Forest</a>, eventually there will be a sudden movement on the forest floor, a quick snap of a machete or other similar implement, and &#8230; elephant shrew will be on the menu. And, most interesting, all three of the aforementioned shrews do not belong comfortably together in a single taxonomic group.  The closest non-shrew relative to the most common North American shrew are moles, the closest non-shrew relative to the Asian tree shrew are flying lemurs, bunnies, primates, and rodents; and the closest non-shrew relative to the African elephant shrew could be, astonishingly, an actual elephant! (Or hyraxes, goldem moles, sea cows or the Aardvark.)<br />
<span id="more-10004"></span><br />
Why do we call all these things shrews?  Well, they are similar: Small, furry, pointy nosed, mostly insect eaters, and they aren&#8217;t something else.  More likely, though, the word &#8220;shrew&#8221; has simply been called on to do more work than any word should be recruited for.  And, all the shrews combined are not cattle, dolphins, antelope, monkeys, pandas, big cats or big dogs, or some other sexy mammal.  I suppose we should be lucky that this diverse group of organisms aren&#8217;t all called &#8220;mouse&#8221; (as in &#8220;eeek, a mouse!&#8221;).  I should note, by the way, that I&#8217;ve not actually mentioned all the known animals called shrews: To do so, I&#8217;d have to mention the otter shrews and the extinct West Indies shrews.</p>
<p>And yes, I have eaten the elephant shrew, and no, it does not taste like chicken.  In fact, almost nothing I&#8217;ve ever eaten that was not a chicken has tasted like chicken.  Elephant shrews don&#8217;t taste like elephants either.</p>
<p><span style="float: left; padding: 5px;"><a href="http://www.researchblogging.org"><img decoding="async" alt="ResearchBlogging.org" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.researchblogging.org/public/citation_icons/rb2_mid.png?w=604" style="border:0;" data-recalc-dims="1"/></a></span>The common mouse-like shrew is in the shrew family Soricidae (Order Soricomorpha), which includes over 300 species distributed among 23 genera.  They are worldwide wherever you find small furry things other than Australia (they are not shrew-roos, after all) and not in South America.  Some of these shrews, in the genera Sorex and Blarina use echolocation, like bats.</p>
<blockquote><p>Six wandering shrews (<em>Sorex vagrans</em>) were trained to echolocate the position of a platform and drop to it. They preferentially directed their ultrasonic emissions at the platform. With their ears plugged, they were unable to locate it above chance levels even though they increased their emission rate. Shrews with hollow tubes in their ears performed as effectively as controls. Echolocating shrews, trained on an elevated Y-maze, detected a 15×15-cm flat metal barrier to a distance of 65 cm. The minimum detectable barrier at 20 cm was 3·5×3·5 cm. They detected a target with a 4×4-cm hole to 30 cm. Their dependence on echolocation was inversely related to familiarity with an area. Audition was important for the location of suitable cover in strange areas. The adaptive significance of echolocation to the wandering shrew is discussed.<sup>1</sup>  </p></blockquote>
<p><a href="https://i0.wp.com/scienceblogs.com/gregladen/common_tree_shrew.jpg"><img decoding="async" src="https://i0.wp.com/scienceblogs.com/gregladen/wp-content/blogs.dir/472/files/2012/04/i-7b952591449361d1f43e752b66c323f1-common_tree_shrew-thumb-300x225-67784.jpg?w=604" alt="i-7b952591449361d1f43e752b66c323f1-common_tree_shrew-thumb-300x225-67784.jpg" data-recalc-dims="1" /></a>Tree shrews have the odd characteristic of possessing human-like ears. They also have a tooth comb (the front teeth make up a comb used for grooming), which is found as well in many prosimian primates.  The tooth comb and a few other traits caused early researchers to suggest that the tree shrew is a living version of the original primate.  We now know that tree shrews share a common ancestor with primates and the flying lemurs to form an unresolved group of related mammals, but there is no particular reason to include or exclude the tree shrew as a model for the first primate. The key primate features that make primates primates (and I greatly oversimplify) are not really found in tree shrews.  The tree shrew tooth comb, for instance, is made up of different teeth than the tooth comb of primates. To my knowledge, no one has explain why they have human-looking ears.  Coincidence, most certainly.</p>
<p>Regarding the elephant shrew:  The version with which I&#8217;m most familiar is the giant elephant shrew (<em>Rhynchocyon cirnei</em>).  (<a href="http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/04/bird_and_mammal_field_guides_f.php">Kingdon</a> probably has the best pictures and descriptions generally available.) This creature has fawn-like markings on it even as an adult, as do many rain forest mammals.  And it is called giant because it is HUGE.  For a shrew.  Small enough to fit in your shoe, but large enough to make a meal. Well, a side dish, anyway.  The most interesting thing I observed with the elephant shrew is not so much the shrew but how the Efe Pygmies handled it.  The Efe have a characteristic way that they butcher the antelopes and monkeys that make up most of the meat in their diet.  But the giant elephant shrew is smaller than any piece into which an antelope is cut using this method.  For many small animals like little song birds or small fish, the Efe just cook the animal on an open fire until it becomes crunch then eat it like you might eat funnel cake at the fair.  But when the caught elephant shrew, always by chance as one happen to wander by in the leaf litter on the forest floor, they butchered it exactly as they butcher an Okapi or a Duiker.  (That process of butchery is the subject of another blog post, which I&#8217;ve not written yet but someday will.  It&#8217;s quite interesting.)</p>
<p>There is one final thing I&#8217;d like to mention about shrews that I find interesting. There are a lot of underground rodents, and some non-underground rodents, that eat roots as their fallback food.  This has been the subject of a fair amount of research by my colleagues and me. These rodents have specific characteristics of their jaw and teeth.  It occurred to us one day that maybe these characteristics had to do with living underground, and not with eating roots.  But the underground dwelling shrews (and other non-rodent mammals, like moles) don&#8217;t have those characteristics at all, showing that big teeth and strong jaws are not caused by eating dirty insects or living in holes. I know, I know, that may not be that interesting to you, but &#8230; well &#8230; I guess you had to be there.</p>
<hr />
<p><sup>1</sup><span class="Z3988" title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&#038;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&#038;rft.jtitle=Animal+Behaviour&#038;rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1016%2FS0003-3472%2876%2980016-4&#038;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fresearchblogging.org&#038;rft.atitle=The+use+of+echolocation+by+the+wandering+shrew+%28Sorex+vagrans%29&#038;rft.issn=00033472&#038;rft.date=1976&#038;rft.volume=24&#038;rft.issue=4&#038;rft.spage=858&#038;rft.epage=873&#038;rft.artnum=http%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS0003347276800164&#038;rft.au=BUCHLER%2C+E.&#038;rfe_dat=bpr3.included=1;bpr3.tags=zoology">BUCHLER, E. (1976). The use of echolocation by the wandering shrew (Sorex vagrans) <span style="font-style: italic;">Animal Behaviour, 24</span> (4), 858-873 DOI: <a rev="review" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(76)80016-4">10.1016/S0003-3472(76)80016-4</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/07/27/why-shrews-are-interesting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">10004</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ethnographic Notes: Efe Forest Camps</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/07/21/camps/</link>
					<comments>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/07/21/camps/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 21:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Efe Ethnoarchaeology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ituri Forest Photo Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pygmies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zaire]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2011/07/21/camps/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[An Efe forest camp is usually dark and depending on the time of day, dripping from current or recent rain. The Efe live in dome shaped huts which may be more or less complete. A half dome might be a hut that was built quickly, or it might be a hut that was built more &#8230; <a href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/07/21/camps/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Ethnographic Notes: Efe Forest Camps</span> <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img decoding="async" src="https://i0.wp.com/scienceblogs.com/gregladen/wp-content/blogs.dir/472/files/2012/04/i-a0bc95db0b3f8db0290555bcebb17144-CPP_02_camp_1985-p-005.jpg?w=604" alt="i-a0bc95db0b3f8db0290555bcebb17144-CPP_02_camp_1985-p-005.jpg" data-recalc-dims="1" /><br />
An Efe forest camp is usually dark and depending on the time of day, dripping from current or recent rain.  The Efe live in dome shaped huts which may be more or less complete.  A half dome might be a hut that was built quickly, or it might be a hut that was built more openly because it has been hot or it might be only a half dome to allow easier access in and out of the hut by children or individuals with injury or infirmity.  A fully domed hut, with a small opening, keeps in more smoke (a fire is often kept in the hut) but it also keeps in the heat and keeps out the rain.  So a rainy season hut may be a full-on dome with a small entrance way. Or, this kind of hut can be made when it has been cold, or when more privacy is needed, or, simply, when more time has been invested in making the hut.<br />
<span id="more-9982"></span><br />
As an ethnoarchaeologist, I see every object in every camp as a physical representation of a moment in a story.  A half-carved spoon next to a perfectly usable already carved spoon is probably something to be given to a villager (why carve a new spoon if you already have one?).  A freshly made bow is a planned hunting trip.  A plantain leaf spine with a clay pipe inserted at the thick end means that someone recently scored some pot.  An empty aluminum pot (acquired years earlier in trade) means that there is hunger in the camp.</p>
<p>But really, each of these observation is a hypothesis. When you ask the people sitting there what is going on, ask about the spoon or the pot or the pipe, you may get nothing, a blank look, a surprise answer, or a story that contradicts what you were thinking.  The pot is empty because everyone just ate, the new spoon will replace the one you thought was perfectly good because the old spoon was borrowed from a village and needs to be returned before someone notices.  The plantain-stem pipe was just fashioned on a hunch.</p>
<p>A hunch?</p>
<p>Yes, a hunch.  It is possible, Mr. Anthropologist, that you have not come empty handed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://gregladen.com/blog/2011/07/21/camps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">9982</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Great White Missionary</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/06/25/the-great-white-missionary/</link>
					<comments>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/06/25/the-great-white-missionary/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthropology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lost congo memoir]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missionaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pygmies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zaire]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2009/06/25/the-great-white-missionary/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It was a rare day that I was at the Ngodingodi research station at all &#8230; usually I was off in the forest with the Efe Pygmies, up the road excavating an archaeological site. It was also rare that Grinker, my cultural anthropologist colleague, was at the research station. He was spending most of his &#8230; <a href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/06/25/the-great-white-missionary/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">The Great White Missionary</span> <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a rare day that I was at the Ngodingodi research station at all &#8230; usually I was off in the forest with the Efe Pygmies, up the road excavating an archaeological site.  It was also rare that Grinker, my cultural anthropologist colleague, was at the research station.  He was spending most of his time in the villages learning language and waiting around for the other shoe to drop (he studied conflict, so on the average day &#8230; not much conflict).</p>
<p>But then an even rarer thing happened.<br />
<span id="more-26682"></span><br />
As we sat, being rare and chatting about the weather, we heard a the sound of a distant truck approaching.  Our visitors (there were always visitors) &#8212; Lese (farmers) and Efe (Pygmies) &#8212; heard it first.  They also figured out first that this was not the car of the Masoeur, the &#8220;Sisters&#8221; of the catholic mission to the south.  (The sisters had driven by a week or two earlier, and thus, might be on their way back from town by this time.)  And it was not our truck. Our Land Rover was sitting there in it&#8217;s little house quietly growing grass out of it&#8217;s front grill.  Nobody else drove up and down the &#8220;road&#8221; so this was a real mystery.</p>
<p>As the vehicle got closer, even I could hear that it was  unfamiliar to us.  Also, it was not hard to surmise that the driver was unfamiliar with the terrain.  Several times the sound of the engine would die away as the driver idled, presumably looking with little relish at the &#8220;road&#8221; immediately ahead, considering how best to bypass the crevasses and holes without falling into a stream or getting hopelessly stuck.</p>
<p>One of us, Grinker or me, said &#8220;Maybe they&#8217;ll turn around.&#8221;<sup>1</sup>  This drew dirty looks from our neighbors.  They wanted visitors.  We wanted to relish being in the most remote spot on this continent.  This was always a minor conflict.</p>
<p>From the time we first heard the vehicle to the time it pulled up to our research camp a half hour passed.  This was enough time for a dozen additional friends and neighbors to arrive in anticipation of a visit, perhaps from someone interesting or important.  They wanted to be there to see who it was.  Our neighbors conjectured that most likely the visitors would be more researchers, coming to join Grinker and me.  That could mean more employment for the people in the local villages as a new roof would surely be needed for the hut the new arrivals would stay in.  Maybe two huts.  If they were a couple that would be one hut.  If they were a couple and a third person, that would be two huts.  If they were three separate people that would be three huts, and there werent&#8217; three huts!  Perhaps a whole new hut would have to be built, and that would be work for more than the usual roofers!  And perhaps the new arrivals would need an informant to help with research, or language tutors.</p>
<p>A virtual economic stimulus package could be driving down the road right now!!</p>
<p>I thought it unlikely that new researchers would be arriving because we had not received any word of potential visitors, but given that there was no direct contact with the outside world and no reliable system of mail, that did not mean much.  Indeed, when my doctoral adviser had died the previous year during the summer, I did not learn of his death until mid October.  So really, this could be anybody.</p>
<p>When the vehicle did make its way down the road close enough to our camp to either pull into our hidden driveway, or accidentally drive past without noticing us (very likely given that we were disguised as a traditional local village and set back from the road), a handful of our neighbors were well positioned on the road to direct what we now saw to be a very new fairly large American built four wheel drive vehicle into the Ngodingodi Research Camp.</p>
<p>Rich and I had already decided, conversing privately in English, to discourage whoever it was from staying unless they needed something serious.  It was the policy of the research project to not become a tourist attraction.  It was not hospitable, but it was normal, to send people away.</p>
<p>So, up drove the vehicle.  The diver was a man in his 40s who was somewhat large, somewhat imposing, dressed in the usual safari suit, and American.  He was accompanied, if memory serves, by a wife and teenage boy child who made such little impression on me that I only barely remember them.  They were quiet and obsequious to the man.  This was very clearly his show.  They were also accompanied by one or two Africans, young men, acting as servants.</p>
<p>&#8220;Well, hallo everyone, with God&#8217;s grace, we made it!  Are you the anthropologists?&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh crap, he&#8217;s here to actually visit <em>us</em>, not just passing through.  Someone must have told him about us.</p>
<p>&#8220;Ah, yes, we are &#8230;  this is our research camp,&#8221; Rich said, as the Great White Visitor sauntered around his car opening doors and his family and servants got out of the vehicle and started wandering around. &#8220;How did you know about us?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Oh, a man named Andre mentioned your research camp when I was in town up north.  I came to see the Pygmies!&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;OK, hold on a second,&#8221; Rich jumped in.</p>
<p>&#8220;We don&#8217;t use that word &#8230; the &#8216;P&#8217; word &#8230; some people find it offensive,&#8221; I said.  &#8220;And you can&#8217;t &#8216;see&#8217; them.  They is not a &#8230; tourist&#8230; attraction.&#8221;</p>
<p>As I spoke he came to the back of the vehicle and opened it,  without much listening to what I was saying. &#8220;Who&#8217;d like some lunch!  We&#8217;ve got ham and cheese sandwiches, some tomato and bacon for BLT&#8217;s, cokes, and look, plenty of ice in the cooler!&#8221;</p>
<p>Bacon? &#8230;  Ice?</p>
<p>We are in the most remote part of Africa and we have bacon?  &#8230; and Ice?</p>
<p>&#8220;So, who&#8217;s hungry?&#8221;</p>
<p>So, Rich turned to me and in some language that was not English quietly said &#8230;. &#8220;well, he can stay for a while I suppose.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Until the ice melts&#8221; I said.  &#8220;And we finish off the bacon.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m not into bacon much,&#8221; replied rich, struggling, as I had, to come up with an understandable word for bacon in a language spoken on in a region with no pigs,<sup>2</sup> &#8220;but did you see that stash of candy bars?  And he&#8217;s got hot chocolate.&#8221;</p>
<p>Our private conversation was interrupted by the Great White Visitor, who was not paying much attention to anyone else anyway.  &#8220;I&#8217;m a missionary. From Oklahoma.&#8221;</p>
<p>So, OK, we could let the guy stay for a while.  But we had to talk about this &#8220;seeing the pygmies&#8221; bit.  He was obviously unaware that three or four of the local people standing around watching him and his party were Efe (Pygmies).  He needed to be educated.</p>
<p>Rich and I were not merely justifying what we were doing for the sake of bacon and ice. We simply made the decision to spend a little time with this guy and his retinue and talk about the Efe, maybe introduce them to some Efe, and help him learn to have a better attitude than to treat the Efe like some kind of tourist destination.  Also, he identified himself as a Missionary from Oklahoma, not as a missionary from some particular group.  What this meant is the following.  He was not an in-country missionary.  He would be funded by some church in Oklahoma to come out to &#8220;Africa&#8221; or someplace and convert some people over to Christianity.  He would take pictures of this and give slide shows in the churches in and near his community showing how he had done this converting and how their money was not wasted, then he would go after more funds to come back and do more converting.</p>
<p>This is how all the missions were funded, but over a longer term and with a larger organization handling the flow of money, the flow of personnel, the flow of supplies and equipment. Great White Missionary was a rogue &#8230; working on his own, paying for his vacations to various foreign lands by giving a dog and pony show between trips showing how he had converted x number of these people and y number of those people who otherwise were pagans living in direct community with Satan.</p>
<p>So we thought we would spend a little time with him so he&#8217;d get a certain impression of what was going on out here, mainly to avoid having him go back, raise the funds to missionize our project area, and return with reinforcements.</p>
<p>And it would take a while to eat all this bacon anyway.  Hey, anyone would have done the same thing in our situation&#8230;</p>
<p>Oh, and there was a lot of bacon.  There was bacon that was cooked already and only needed to be reheated in the toaster oven that magically operated in the back of his Great White Truck.  And there were kilos and kilos of frozen bacon that he wanted us to take from him to be distributed among the Efe.</p>
<p>So, Great White Missionary and his retinue sat with us at our research camp and we served tea with his BLT&#8217;s, ham and cheese sandwiches, and candy bars.  He had many questions and many things to tell us. His way of communicating was like this:  Random crap would rattle around his head and every now and then some item would happen to be near that hole in the front we call a mouth and fall out.</p>
<p>&#8220;The Pygmies are pagans, they believe that spirits live in rocks.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Actually, most of the Efe, we don&#8217;t call them Pygmies, are monotheists.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;These Pygmies have already been converted? I&#8217;d like to watch them hunt.  Can you arrange for me to hunt with them?  Is is true that many of the children are born with tails?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Actually, the Efe, we don&#8217;t call them Pygmies, are monotheists because that is their religion.  They are not Christians&#8230;. And that tail thing is not true&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Everything is based on a kernel of truth.  You better check for the tails.  Offer them some of this bacon and I&#8217;ll bet they&#8217;ll go hunting with me.  Can we see where they live?  Do you have a rifle?&#8221;</p>
<p><em>&#8230; this sort of thing went on for a while, and as it did, Rich and I formulated a plan and slowly put it into effect. In the background, we kept up a conversation with one of our Efe informants who&#8217;s camp was actually only a few hundred meters away just off the road &#8230;  </em></p>
<p>&#8220;So, do the Pygmies have a concept of hell and Satan?  Satan&#8217;s greatest trick is not being known to those who worship him.  I&#8217;m afraid they may worship Satan.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Ah, well, no, these Efe (We don&#8217;t call them Pygmies) are actually Christians!&#8221; (changing our story a little).</p>
<p>&#8220;Really?  Hmm..  In Zimbabwe, I taught a thousand people in one village to accept the word of Jesus our savior.  With a single sermon.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Yes.  The Efe have been Christians for generations, thanks to the mission up north of here. You passed it on your way down.  There used to be white missionaries there, and in those days, everyone became a Christian!&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Really?&#8221; &#8230; a sense of disappointment creeping into his voice. &#8220;In Zambia, I started a food program.  To receive the food, you had to be a young boy.  By giving the food only to the young boys, the food would get distributed evenly across all the households.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Right.  Everybody.  For miles in every direction.  The whole region.  Already Christian.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Oh.  Well, can we go and visit a Pygmy Village.  In that village in Zambia, I had a rule.  If you behaved, you got a specially made token &#8230; a coin I had minted in Oklahoma, like a subway token, at a trophy shop. They had crosses on them. Every time you were good you got one or two tokens.  Then, twice a week the young boys would line up and turn their tokens over to me and they would get a bag of food.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Ah&#8230; right, OK.  We could visit an Efe camp.  We don&#8217;t call them Pygmies.  They are the Efe.  They don&#8217;t live in villages.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;The Africans are all like children, even when they are adults.  But if you set up a structure for them, they&#8217;ll follow it.  You wouldn&#8217;t believe the size of the Boa Constrictor I saw in Malawi.  It was twenty feet long. A certain amount of discipline is important, and that is what I taught the boys in Zambia.  Great, let&#8217;s go to the Pygmy Village&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;They live in a camp.  There&#8217;s an Efe Camp nearby.  This gentleman here is from that camp, he&#8217;ll show us.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230; So, we spent the next hour in the bush, cutting our way through vines and undergrowth, traipsing through swamps and streams, climbing over steep and muddy banks, and cutting through more undergrowth.  You see, the Efe place their camps, most of the time, on an easily accessible trail connecting the camp to the road or a nearby village.  This particular camp was a five minute walk, across the street and through a meadow and then into secondary forest growth for about 50 meters.  But we took the long way. The very long, rugged way.  We felt it essential that Great White Boy Lover not know the route to anything in our project area&#8230;.</p>
<p>Now, covered with mud and the ubiquitous rotted plant matter that rains continuously on passers by in the rain forest, soaked with dew and sweat, we arrived in the &#8220;Pygmy Village.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Have a seat&#8221; I said, handing Great White and each of his two companions (the servants were left behind in our research camp) three sticks.  As they held the sticks, one of the Efe cut three pieces of vine off of a nearby tree, and in seconds, fashioned each into a sturdy ring about 8 inches in diameter.  By that time I had picked my own vine-ring off the roof of a nearby hut, and had placed my own three sticks within the ring, and made a chair on which to sit.</p>
<p>The Forest Folding Chair is a hoot. Three sticks through a ring, at an angle.  The first stick holds up the second, the second the third, the third the first.  There is nothing soft to sit on (though you can add cloth or a pile of leaves) but they keep you up out of the mud and above the ants.  However, getting the seat to not fall down, and sitting in it without causing it to crash, is an art that takes some time to learn.</p>
<p>After considerable fooling around and a great deal of help from the Efe men, who suppressed their laugh while the women and children ROTF at the clumsiness of the Great White Retinue, all were seated.  Great White Missionary proceeded to ask me questions to ask the Efe, and mostly I simply relayed the questions and answers back and forth.  They were about hunting, about snakes, about food, and about god.  The god questions &#8230;.. I just made up the answers so that the missionary would be assured that everyone here was already a Christian.</p>
<p>As we spoke, one of the Efe men unwrapped a small bundle of marijuana and broke it to little pieces, putting aside the few seeds that were in the buds, and cut the leaves and flowers into tiny pieces using his arrow, allowing the bits to fall on a flat sheet of metal that had been sitting by the fire.  Meanwhile, a different man took a leave of tobacco and placed it right near the fire where it would dry very thoroughly and quickly.  Just as the tobacco was starting to emit a bit of smoke, he pulled it away from the fire, powdered it by crushing it in his fist, and added it to the marijuana to make a rather potent mix.  The mix was held near the fire a bit longer to dry it further.</p>
<p>A third Efe man took a large plantain plant leaf from the roof of a nearby hut where it had been stored earlier.  No one had noticed that this man actually had cut the plantain leaf, about eight feet long, from a plant right next to where we were sitting at the Ngodingodi research camp, and walked off with it at the same time the rest of us headed out for the Efe camp.  This man walked directly to the camp rather than taking the long way, and was in the Efe camp, having a nap, at the time of our arrival.</p>
<p>Anyway, he stripped the fleshy leafy part of the leaf away, leaving only the stem that runs down the middle. He then took two strips of palm &#8216;wood&#8217; that had been fastened together to make a 10 foot long stick, and skilfully ran this through the middle of the plantain leaf&#8217;s stem the long way, making it into a giant hollowed-out pipe stem.  He then cut a platform into the thick end, and produced a small clay pipe bowl and set it onto the platform, pushing it into the stem, so that the hole of the clay pipe lined up with the hole he had made down the middle.</p>
<p>And thus, he produced an eight foot long pot pipe.</p>
<p>The men then loaded the pipe up with the pot/tobacco mixture.  One man sat at one end of the pipe and another and at the other end, eight feet apart.  The man at the clay-pie end dropped a small piece of burning wood from the fire onto the mixture while the other man took one huge toke, started gasping and coughing, pounded his open palm on the juncture of his upper arm and chest making a loud popping sound, and shouted &#8220;Hojeeee!!!! Mardo!!!!&#8221; and passed the pipe to a nearby woman, who did the same thing except the part about yelling &#8220;Hojee&#8221; (inside joke.)</p>
<p>Thusly, the pipe was refilled and passed around, one filling getting two or three tokes (and one toke per person).  Every now and then, someone would cut a bit off the mouth-end of the pipe and discard it.  If the pipe needed to be brought to someone sitting farther away than nine or ten feet (the distance that the pipe could be simply passed hand to hand because it was so long) then a child was called over and told to bring the pipe to the next person.  In this way, minors were implicated in the practice of smoking pot.  Some but not all of the teenagers, who must have looked to Great White&#8217;s western eyes (despite his experience with&#8230; young boys &#8230;) to be a few years younger than they were (as young Efe often do given their size) also smoked.</p>
<p>The young son of Great White had his head bowed and was praying. Mom was wide eyed and &#8230; looked like she wanted to join in.  Great White himself was turning red and his questions got increasingly incoherent as he obtained a reasonable contact high.</p>
<p>When the pipe eventually came to me, I took a medium size toke but left a lot (but not all) of the smoke in my mouth, and immediately blew it out.  I &#8216;pretended&#8217; to cough, and gave Great White a side long look, saying &#8220;I have to do this.  Part of the research.  But I never inhale&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>For his part, Grinker took a totally fake toke (he never smoked) but pretended to become totally stoned, rolled his eyes back into his head, and fell backwards off his chair onto a midden of dead leaves and cassava shavings.</p>
<p>~~~~</p>
<p>Later on, back at the research camp, Great White and his fellow travelers silently packed up the truck.  Only part of the promised bacon wad handed over, and this was given to the Efe who accommodated us.  The pot smoking experience had totally blown their minds and they were not going to recover from this.  The &#8216;fact&#8217; that these Efe were Christians was not in accord with what this Oklahoman Evangelical could reconcile with their clearly Satanic behavior.  I wondered what stories he would weave to turn this experience into something he could somehow take credit for.  He never got to do his hunting (&#8230; in fact, I had told him that this was not hunting season.  Which is a very, very funny concept &#8230;) so maybe he would make something up about hunting.</p>
<p>Great White was an ignoramus.  He was a liar.  He was a pedophile.  He was a swindler. He was not a typical missionary, because most of the missionaries were not rogue like he was, but rather, part of a larger and highly organized effort. But he embodied much of the hypocrisy institutionalized in the larger organizations, personified it, made it real, palpable, and more overtly despicable.</p>
<p>A few months later, I ran into Andre, the merchant in town who suggested this visit to begin with.  As usual, we retired to the back of Andre&#8217;s store for some Greek coffee.  I told him the story of the Great White Visit.  Andre was embarrassed.</p>
<p>&#8220;I won&#8217;t sent you any one like that again,&#8221; he promised.</p>
<p>&#8220;I know, my friend.  I know that.&#8221;</p>
<hr />
<p><sup>1</sup>We usually spoke in a locally understood language even when speaking to each other, as part of our own language training.  The idea was to use English only when absolutely necessary.  Really, I should be telling you this whole story in Kinguana, but that would <em>chagiza</em> you.</p>
<p><sup>2</sup>A derivation of &#8220;The pig of the forest that lives in our house among us, it&#8217;s flesh&#8221; if I recall correctly.  It would have been easy to say in KiSwahili but for some reason he was saying it in KiLese.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://gregladen.com/blog/2009/06/25/the-great-white-missionary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">26682</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
