<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Boundary Waters &#8211; Greg Laden&#039;s Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/tag/boundary-waters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2018 23:52:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">77525483</site>	<item>
		<title>One step backwards for copper-nickel-sulfide mining in Minnesota&#8217;s Boundary Waters</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2018/07/24/one-step-backwards-for-copper-nickle-sulfide-mining-in-minnesotas-boundary-waters/</link>
					<comments>https://gregladen.com/blog/2018/07/24/one-step-backwards-for-copper-nickle-sulfide-mining-in-minnesotas-boundary-waters/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2018 20:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boundary Waters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copper Mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copper Sulfide Mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polymet land swap]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gregladen.com/blog/?p=29939</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I was just starting to think that every single thing that could go wrong in the effort to stop or limit destructive copper-nickel-sulfide mining in the fragile Boundary Waters ecosystem was going to go wrong. Then, suddenly, a reversal of fortune. This is complicated but for those not following, I&#8217;ll try to provide an explanation. &#8230; <a href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2018/07/24/one-step-backwards-for-copper-nickle-sulfide-mining-in-minnesotas-boundary-waters/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">One step backwards for copper-nickel-sulfide mining in Minnesota&#8217;s Boundary Waters</span> <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just starting to think that every single thing that could go wrong in the effort to stop or limit destructive copper-nickel-sulfide mining in the fragile Boundary Waters ecosystem was going to go wrong. Then, suddenly, a reversal of fortune.</p>
<p>This is complicated but for those not following, I&#8217;ll try to provide an explanation.</p>
<p>The Boundary Waters contains rock near the surface that miners want to mine. And, very little can be done to stop this, given that we chose over the last few years to put Republicans in charge, and they are puppets of industry, especially extractive industries like mining.</p>
<p>Part of the process of mining in the boundary waters, which are legally protected from mining is to remove the protections by &#8220;swapping&#8221; land that is not in the protected area for land that is in the protected area.  This is known as the Polymet Land Swap because Polymet is the the company that wants to do this particular mining.  Politicians on both sides of the aisle have been convinced, against their constituent&#8217;s demands, that the mining will continue. So, the land swap seemed a done deal, and everything that various opponents to the project have tried has failed.</p>
<p>Until just a few moments ago. One effort to limit or stop the mining is to insist that the courts have a look at the relative value of the land being swapped in this deal.  The usual powers had tried to get that taken off the table, and it seemed successfully, until today. Under public pressure, netotiators in Congress have worked out a deal to drop the limit on the court&#8217;s consideration of relative value. It is all here in this press release from the <a href="http://www.mncenter.org/">Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE July 24, 2018 End congressional delays, let courts finally review PolyMet land exchange Saint Paul, Minnesota &#8212; Monday, congressional negotiators announced that a provision to end court review of the PolyMet land exchange had been dropped from the National Defense Authorization Act. Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy is one of the organizations asking for a court review of the PolyMet land exchange, and released the following statement: “Sixteen months ago, we asked a federal court to review the PolyMet land exchange to ensure it provides an equal value exchange for taxpayers and public land users,” stated Kathryn Hoffman, CEO of Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy. “Attempts to derail this review through congressional action have stalled the finalization of the land exchange and delayed justice for Minnesotans. This could have been done by now &#8211; it’s time to end the delays and let the courts do their job.” In March 2017, Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy, The W.J. McCabe Chapter of the Izaak Walton League, and Center for Biological Diversity asked a federal court to review the land exchange, arguing that it illegally undervalued public land. There are three additional lawsuits that argue that the PolyMet land exchange violates federal laws. In March 2018, U.S. District Judge Joan Erickson dismissed PolyMet’s motions to dismiss these lawsuits, but indefinitely stayed all of them pending congressional action. On June 28th, the U.S. Forest Service announced that it had completed the transfer of over 6,600 acres to PolyMet, but this action is subject to court review and can be modified or reversed if found to be in violation of federal law. </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://gregladen.com/blog/2018/07/24/one-step-backwards-for-copper-nickle-sulfide-mining-in-minnesotas-boundary-waters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">29939</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Protecting Minnesota’s Waters from PolyMet Copper-Nickel Mine Pollution</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2018/06/14/protecting-minnesotas-waters-from-polymet-copper-nickel-mine-pollution/</link>
					<comments>https://gregladen.com/blog/2018/06/14/protecting-minnesotas-waters-from-polymet-copper-nickel-mine-pollution/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2018 18:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boundary Waters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copper-nickle-sulfide-mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polymet]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gregladen.com/blog/?p=29766</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Every single place that Copper-Nickle-Sulfide mining has been done &#8212; every. single. location. &#8212; the mining companies left behind a destroyed landscape. There have been no exceptions. This sort of mining can not be done without destroying the landscape. It is quite possible that Minnesota&#8217;s boundary waters are not saving, and we should just mine &#8230; <a href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2018/06/14/protecting-minnesotas-waters-from-polymet-copper-nickel-mine-pollution/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Protecting Minnesota’s Waters from PolyMet Copper-Nickel Mine Pollution</span> <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every single place that Copper-Nickle-Sulfide mining has been done &#8212; every. single. location. &#8212; the mining companies left behind a destroyed landscape.  There have been no exceptions.</p>
<p>This sort of mining can not be done without destroying the landscape.</p>
<p>It is quite possible that Minnesota&#8217;s boundary waters are not saving, and we should just mine out the copper.</p>
<p>Or, not.</p>
<p>Look: <span id="more-29766"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>Want to see for yourself what’s at stake if the proposed PolyMet open pit copper-nickel mine is permitted in Northern Minnesota? Watch this new documentary, “Journey to Protect Minnesota’s Waters: Revealing the Contested PolyMet Mine Site,” shot on the proposed PolyMet mine location on Minnesota’s Partridge River in the Lake Superior Basin. </p>
<p>Featured in this 14-minute video filmed by Robin Heil are interviews with Fond du Lac elder, Ricky W. DeFoe, WaterLegacy advocacy director Paula Maccabee and forester Matt Tyler; and original music by Twin Cities guitarist Timothy ”Brother Timothy” Frantzich and Powwow Singer Algin Garyt Goodsky as well as the breathtaking scenery of the Partridge River in the Lake Superior watershed. </p>
<p>For more information on how you protect the Lake Superior and Boundary Waters watersheds from toxic mining pollution that would lead to an environmental catastrophe, visit <a href="http://waterlegacy.org">http://waterlegacy.org</a></p></blockquote>
<p><iframe width="604" height="340" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/TDBDw-bkcK4?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://gregladen.com/blog/2018/06/14/protecting-minnesotas-waters-from-polymet-copper-nickel-mine-pollution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">29766</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
