<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Dear New York Times: Trump Is Anti Choice	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2023/11/16/dear-new-york-times-trump-is-anti-choice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2023/11/16/dear-new-york-times-trump-is-anti-choice/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2023 16:39:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Christopher Winter		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2023/11/16/dear-new-york-times-trump-is-anti-choice/#comment-1005488</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher Winter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2023 16:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gregladen.com/blog/?p=35387#comment-1005488</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I guess this is in response to Ruth Igielnik&#039;s 14 November &lt;i&gt;New York Times&lt;/i&gt; analysis (updated 20 November) that says Trump&#039;s vagueness on the question of abortion makes him less vulnerable than other GOP candidates. It&#039;s true; Trump is a vacillator. In 1999, he said he was was pro-choice.

https://www.mic.com/articles/167090/wasn-t-trump-once-pro-choice-here-s-the-president-s-evolving-platform-on-abortion

Similarly, he was once a Democrat and supported action on climate change, signing on to a letter that urged President Obama to do more in 2009, just before COP15.

Personally, I keep wishing that vague statements on issues would make a candidate &lt;b&gt;more&lt;/b&gt; vulnerable.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess this is in response to Ruth Igielnik&#8217;s 14 November <i>New York Times</i> analysis (updated 20 November) that says Trump&#8217;s vagueness on the question of abortion makes him less vulnerable than other GOP candidates. It&#8217;s true; Trump is a vacillator. In 1999, he said he was was pro-choice.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.mic.com/articles/167090/wasn-t-trump-once-pro-choice-here-s-the-president-s-evolving-platform-on-abortion" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.mic.com/articles/167090/wasn-t-trump-once-pro-choice-here-s-the-president-s-evolving-platform-on-abortion</a></p>
<p>Similarly, he was once a Democrat and supported action on climate change, signing on to a letter that urged President Obama to do more in 2009, just before COP15.</p>
<p>Personally, I keep wishing that vague statements on issues would make a candidate <b>more</b> vulnerable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
