<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: How fusion works, and are we there yet?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2022/12/13/how-fusion-works-and-are-we-there-yet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2022/12/13/how-fusion-works-and-are-we-there-yet/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2022 05:28:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2022/12/13/how-fusion-works-and-are-we-there-yet/#comment-985706</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2022 05:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gregladen.com/blog/?p=34973#comment-985706</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gregladen.com/blog/2022/12/13/how-fusion-works-and-are-we-there-yet/#comment-985669&quot;&gt;joe laden&lt;/a&gt;.

Sabine!  A great explainer.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2022/12/13/how-fusion-works-and-are-we-there-yet/#comment-985669">joe laden</a>.</p>
<p>Sabine!  A great explainer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: joe laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2022/12/13/how-fusion-works-and-are-we-there-yet/#comment-985669</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joe laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2022 22:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gregladen.com/blog/?p=34973#comment-985669</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[And they will run this with a quantum computer with a fusion-powered cooling unit.  
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJ4W1g-6JiY]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And they will run this with a quantum computer with a fusion-powered cooling unit.<br />
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJ4W1g-6JiY" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJ4W1g-6JiY</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: RickA		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2022/12/13/how-fusion-works-and-are-we-there-yet/#comment-985663</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RickA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2022 16:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gregladen.com/blog/?p=34973#comment-985663</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Greg:

Nice explanation!  I agree we are still probably 40 or 50 years away.  But progress!

When the lab reports they got out more energy than they put in - they are only talking about the energy in the laser beam versus what they got out.  In reality it takes a lot more energy to power the equipment which generates the laser beam, so we are not really getting more out than we put in - if you factor in all the energy required to produce the laser beam (which is a lot more than the actual energy in the laser beam).

Still - fusion would be the best solution if we can get it to work, at scale and consistently.  I also read that we have a very small amount of tritium, which is the preferred fuel for fusion.  So even if we get fusion to work - once we scale it up will we run out of fuel?  Not sure.

Still - nice article.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg:</p>
<p>Nice explanation!  I agree we are still probably 40 or 50 years away.  But progress!</p>
<p>When the lab reports they got out more energy than they put in &#8211; they are only talking about the energy in the laser beam versus what they got out.  In reality it takes a lot more energy to power the equipment which generates the laser beam, so we are not really getting more out than we put in &#8211; if you factor in all the energy required to produce the laser beam (which is a lot more than the actual energy in the laser beam).</p>
<p>Still &#8211; fusion would be the best solution if we can get it to work, at scale and consistently.  I also read that we have a very small amount of tritium, which is the preferred fuel for fusion.  So even if we get fusion to work &#8211; once we scale it up will we run out of fuel?  Not sure.</p>
<p>Still &#8211; nice article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
