<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Chicks: March March	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2020/06/26/the-chicks-march-march/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2020/06/26/the-chicks-march-march/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2020 16:26:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: StevoR		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2020/06/26/the-chicks-march-march/#comment-889121</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[StevoR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2020 16:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gregladen.com/blog/?p=33137#comment-889121</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good band, good songs. By any other name .. Whistling along.  

Cheers for this Greg Laden.  :-)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good band, good songs. By any other name .. Whistling along.  </p>
<p>Cheers for this Greg Laden.  🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bernard J.		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2020/06/26/the-chicks-march-march/#comment-883331</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bernard J.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2020 14:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gregladen.com/blog/?p=33137#comment-883331</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gregladen.com/blog/2020/06/26/the-chicks-march-march/#comment-881201&quot;&gt;Tyvor Winn&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;m with Tyvor on this.

Pruning the outliers results in the more moderate parts of a society and its ways of thinking themselves eventually becoming outliers to be targetted for expungement.  Unless care and reason are employed, at some point there is an impossible rush to rigid and narrow comformity.

Sooner or later  such overzealous societies will wither and die.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2020/06/26/the-chicks-march-march/#comment-881201">Tyvor Winn</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m with Tyvor on this.</p>
<p>Pruning the outliers results in the more moderate parts of a society and its ways of thinking themselves eventually becoming outliers to be targetted for expungement.  Unless care and reason are employed, at some point there is an impossible rush to rigid and narrow comformity.</p>
<p>Sooner or later  such overzealous societies will wither and die.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tyvor Winn		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2020/06/26/the-chicks-march-march/#comment-881201</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tyvor Winn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2020 17:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gregladen.com/blog/?p=33137#comment-881201</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is getting silly. The group formerly known as the &quot;Dixie Chicks&quot; can do what they choose, but I hope we don&#039;t get so carried away as a nation that we remove &quot;dixie&quot; from the American vocabulary because it refers to the Southland and that area was the main slave-holding part of the U. S. Do we then remove the term &quot;South&quot; itself? In state names, for example? How far do we go?

It makes sense to get rid of the symbols of the Confederacy because the Confederacy was a direct response to the unconstituional rebellion of several slave-holding states from the American union and was based on and dedicated to maintaining slavery and even extending it. (One would have to be very naive to think that if the Confederate States had won independence, it would not have tried to expand into the land west of the Mississippi even as the remaining United States also expanded westward.)  

Not everything about or in some way related to slavery in the American colonies and the succeeding United States of America can be expunged from language and history without lying to future generations about that history and losing the story of the great and ongoing struggle in the U. S. to live up to the ideals of opportunity, equal justice, and elected representatives of the governed within the government.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is getting silly. The group formerly known as the &#8220;Dixie Chicks&#8221; can do what they choose, but I hope we don&#8217;t get so carried away as a nation that we remove &#8220;dixie&#8221; from the American vocabulary because it refers to the Southland and that area was the main slave-holding part of the U. S. Do we then remove the term &#8220;South&#8221; itself? In state names, for example? How far do we go?</p>
<p>It makes sense to get rid of the symbols of the Confederacy because the Confederacy was a direct response to the unconstituional rebellion of several slave-holding states from the American union and was based on and dedicated to maintaining slavery and even extending it. (One would have to be very naive to think that if the Confederate States had won independence, it would not have tried to expand into the land west of the Mississippi even as the remaining United States also expanded westward.)  </p>
<p>Not everything about or in some way related to slavery in the American colonies and the succeeding United States of America can be expunged from language and history without lying to future generations about that history and losing the story of the great and ongoing struggle in the U. S. to live up to the ideals of opportunity, equal justice, and elected representatives of the governed within the government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
