<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Overthrowing The Big Bang Theory	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2020/06/13/overthrowing-the-big-bang-theory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2020/06/13/overthrowing-the-big-bang-theory/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2020 20:04:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Tyvor Winn		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2020/06/13/overthrowing-the-big-bang-theory/#comment-879184</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tyvor Winn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2020 20:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gregladen.com/blog/?p=32999#comment-879184</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What is the use of thousands of different typefaces (what many people call &quot;fonts&quot;) if you are enjoined from using more than one in a communication?  Whatever happened to evaluating something on its intrinsic merits?  This restriction seems to me to be kin to &quot;dress for success&quot; and other dress codish, 1950ish pleas for mindless conformity. Phooey to that.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the use of thousands of different typefaces (what many people call &#8220;fonts&#8221;) if you are enjoined from using more than one in a communication?  Whatever happened to evaluating something on its intrinsic merits?  This restriction seems to me to be kin to &#8220;dress for success&#8221; and other dress codish, 1950ish pleas for mindless conformity. Phooey to that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Christopher Winter		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2020/06/13/overthrowing-the-big-bang-theory/#comment-879136</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher Winter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2020 01:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gregladen.com/blog/?p=32999#comment-879136</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gregladen.com/blog/2020/06/13/overthrowing-the-big-bang-theory/#comment-879134&quot;&gt;Christopher Winter&lt;/a&gt;.

Too late to edit the original...

&quot;masses of atoms&quot; should read &quot;masses of elementary particles.&quot;

Also, Dr. Landis says the jury is still out on Heim Theory.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2020/06/13/overthrowing-the-big-bang-theory/#comment-879134">Christopher Winter</a>.</p>
<p>Too late to edit the original&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;masses of atoms&#8221; should read &#8220;masses of elementary particles.&#8221;</p>
<p>Also, Dr. Landis says the jury is still out on Heim Theory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Christopher Winter		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2020/06/13/overthrowing-the-big-bang-theory/#comment-879134</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher Winter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2020 00:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gregladen.com/blog/?p=32999#comment-879134</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You&#039;ve probably heard of Heim Theory. This attempt by maverick German physicist Burkhard Heim, published in 1957, was an attempt at a &quot;theory of everything.&quot; It seemed impressive because it claimed to calculate the masses of atoms from first principles.

Geoffrey Landis recounts its rise and fall.

http://www.geoffreylandis.com/Heim_theory.html]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve probably heard of Heim Theory. This attempt by maverick German physicist Burkhard Heim, published in 1957, was an attempt at a &#8220;theory of everything.&#8221; It seemed impressive because it claimed to calculate the masses of atoms from first principles.</p>
<p>Geoffrey Landis recounts its rise and fall.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.geoffreylandis.com/Heim_theory.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.geoffreylandis.com/Heim_theory.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
