<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Chantal, Welcome to Storm World	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2019/07/28/chantal-welcome-to-storm-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2019/07/28/chantal-welcome-to-storm-world/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2019 19:00:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2019/07/28/chantal-welcome-to-storm-world/#comment-787537</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2019 01:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gregladen.com/blog/?p=32192#comment-787537</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gregladen.com/blog/2019/07/28/chantal-welcome-to-storm-world/#comment-787518&quot;&gt;Christopher Winter&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks for pointint that out. I had been looking at a list that said &quot;Chantal (unused)&quot; and thought that meant it was unused. The list meant it was unused so far this year.

There have been many Chantals.  Six, to be exact in the Atlantic.  1989 and 2001 were semi-bad ones (cat 1 in 1989 and mostly a tropical storm in 2001) because the hit stuff.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2019/07/28/chantal-welcome-to-storm-world/#comment-787518">Christopher Winter</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for pointint that out. I had been looking at a list that said &#8220;Chantal (unused)&#8221; and thought that meant it was unused. The list meant it was unused so far this year.</p>
<p>There have been many Chantals.  Six, to be exact in the Atlantic.  1989 and 2001 were semi-bad ones (cat 1 in 1989 and mostly a tropical storm in 2001) because the hit stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Christopher Winter		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2019/07/28/chantal-welcome-to-storm-world/#comment-787518</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher Winter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2019 23:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gregladen.com/blog/?p=32192#comment-787518</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;Chantal has not been used as an Atlantic tropical storm or hurricane name.&lt;/i&gt;

Are you sure? I remember Mark Whittington, whose GF at the time was named Chantal, being much amused by the headline &quot;Thousands flee Chantal&#039;s savage fury.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Chantal has not been used as an Atlantic tropical storm or hurricane name.</i></p>
<p>Are you sure? I remember Mark Whittington, whose GF at the time was named Chantal, being much amused by the headline &#8220;Thousands flee Chantal&#8217;s savage fury.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
