btw, k9DEAN, government land should be give to the people
and not held for little reason by the bureaucracy. Of course,
this simple Marxist logic did not occur to you.

Does anyone want my membership for the Club of Romana?

No, your comment is stupid because you don’t have any rational reason for it — but you’ve never made a rational argument for anything, so that isn’t a surprise. It seems simply spouting libertarian bullshit is enough for you.

Equally stupid: assuming that when rational people call out your stupidity and behavior means that those people are socialists.
a) There is no reason to believe that’s true
b) Baseless accusations are your specialty
c) You’ve never given any indication you’d understand the definition of socialist

I don’t know why this land is owned by the government, so can’t make any statement. You’d need to look at the original reasons, determine what benefit results from keeping it from development, etc, to begin to make a reasoned argument.

The assessment of your latest statement (and all your others) stands.

Don’t like having accurate descriptions made of you billyR? Stop deserving them.

This clown is also very toxic and should be regulated and
permitted by the local authorities.

I know the answer, as a Socshevik – 110%.

Forgot the map.

https://www.recreation.gov/permits/map_of_Boundary_Waters_Canoe_Area_Wilderness_Reservations/r/wildernessAreaMap.do?contractCode=NRSO&parkId=72600

“BTW, governments own too much land in the first place.”

Wondered how long it would be before some asshole tossed that line out. It wasn’t long, and the a-hole’s identity isn’t any surprise.

Federal Land
(Superior National Forest land
to be conveyed to PolyMet)
The federal land (6,650 acres) is a
contiguous tract of forested land located
at the northern boundary of the Superior
National Forest, approximately six miles
south of Babbitt in St. Louis County.”

http://polymetmining.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/45451_PolyMet_LandExchangePamphlet_A39-Web.pdf

BWCA, is one of Minnesota crown jewels with few supporting
mining in that pristine region.

BTW, governments own too much land in the first place.

Billy, I’m not gaslighting anyone, but thanks for the link.

Two facts you are ignoring, one of which I suspect you know, the other not.

1) Mining of all kinds in all places is based on the business model of going in, getting the minerals, and getting out with minimal liability.

2) This particular area, in the Boundary waters, is a wild and environmentally sensitive area. It was already set aside for preservation. Nobody should be building anything here, let alone a mine.