<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Out with the old (oil) and in with the new (wind)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2018/03/12/old-oil-new-wind/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2018/03/12/old-oil-new-wind/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 20:27:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Boletim de Notícias: Governo desconversa sobre dinheiro para o observatório ESO &#124; Direto da Ci&#234;ncia		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2018/03/12/old-oil-new-wind/#comment-574733</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boletim de Notícias: Governo desconversa sobre dinheiro para o observatório ESO &#124; Direto da Ci&#234;ncia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2018 13:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gregladen.com/blog/?p=29191#comment-574733</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Out with the old (oil) and in with the new (wind) [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Out with the old (oil) and in with the new (wind) [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dean		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2018/03/12/old-oil-new-wind/#comment-574598</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 22:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gregladen.com/blog/?p=29191#comment-574598</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;no problem signing an easement to give Enbridge permission to add another line in 2010. &quot;

2010?

It&#039;s good to keep a close eye on Enbridge. We&#039;re still dealing with the spill from one of their lines a few years ago. Their alert system that the line was leaking didn&#039;t work. They delayed cleaning up several times, and the Kalamazoo River still isn&#039;t right. 

The line that runs under the straights of Mackinac is also in the news. A recent report from Enbridge to the state about the condition of the line (after they conducted an inspection) was pretty quickly shown to contain a good amount of false information: inspections and photos from an independent group contradicted several points the &quot;official&quot; version included. Enbridge officials released a revised report that agreed with the second version.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;no problem signing an easement to give Enbridge permission to add another line in 2010. &#8221;</p>
<p>2010?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s good to keep a close eye on Enbridge. We&#8217;re still dealing with the spill from one of their lines a few years ago. Their alert system that the line was leaking didn&#8217;t work. They delayed cleaning up several times, and the Kalamazoo River still isn&#8217;t right. </p>
<p>The line that runs under the straights of Mackinac is also in the news. A recent report from Enbridge to the state about the condition of the line (after they conducted an inspection) was pretty quickly shown to contain a good amount of false information: inspections and photos from an independent group contradicted several points the &#8220;official&#8221; version included. Enbridge officials released a revised report that agreed with the second version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
