Buy her a copy of a Bob Dylan CD with, ‘ The Times they are a changing’ on it

Vote her out

The notion that Europe is on par, or ahead, of the US in mass shootings is completely false. Your dishonesty is amazing — I assume you get it from Lott. Conflating terrorist related events with mass shootings is massively dishonest. If you are so dishonest that you won’t compare apples to apples, there is no hope for a reasonable discussion.

10 to 1 on you are a AGW denier unit.
The thought process is identical in form.
Gets so fuckin tedious…

You cant put together a coherent argumant for shit , so dont be hassling other peoples debating skills.
Its just a litany of rubbish you writing here.
Its almost as if you are anti gun and sort of taking the piss out of pro gun ways of thought process.

Li D
Australia

The thing that amuses me in this fallacious discussion on the need for guns is that ammomaniacs think that they’re going to rescue a society that for whatever reason tumbles from democracy. Looking at the example of US gun-totin’ RWNJs, there is no plausible scenario where they will ever form a ‘well organised militia’ that saves the nation from despotism – quite the opposite, they’ve nurtured the country’s decent into exactly that state of affairs.

2ns amendment adherents are kidding themselves that their guns are what stands between their society and the zombie apocalypse. If it ever came to these Rambos using their caches all that would result is the same break-down of government, with a lot of extra dead people and looting besides.

Now tell us the logical fallacy you employed! Now tell us the logical fallacy you employed!

But today, concerned people are deciding to take back their lives and their communities from the gun terrorists. People are realizing that the second amendment has been used as a cover for nationalist extremists and other terrorists who have taken control of our “representatives” and who have thwarted the will of the people.

Never again.

Now do cars! Now do cars!

“In 2010, there were an estimated 5,419,000 crashes, 30,296 of with fatalities, killing 32,999, and injuring 2,239,000.[2] About 2,000 children under 16 die every year in traffic collisions.[3] Records indicate that there has been a total of 3,613,732 motor vehicle fatalities in the United States from 1899 to 2013.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motor_vehicle_fatality_rate_in_U.S._by_year

“Nope, both you and the awful source you link are employing the standard diversionary rhetoric. The issue is not individual rights it is the purpose for which those rights are accorded.”

Never heard that before. Got anything to back that up?

For example could you explain for what express “purpose” the right to free speech was accorded?