<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 25 years of Linux in 5 minutes	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2018/01/23/25-years-linux-5-minutes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2018/01/23/25-years-linux-5-minutes/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2018 18:35:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: dhogaza		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2018/01/23/25-years-linux-5-minutes/#comment-564797</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dhogaza]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2018 18:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gregladen.com/blog/?p=28745#comment-564797</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[They&#039;re not spot on, and the person he&#039;s screaming at gives a long, in-depth analysis of the proposed linux patches in the context of the intel microcode patches which are meant as a workaround.   

This post in the thread, in particular, is informative (and the author gets props for not responding for Linus&#039;s earlier baiting and name calling):

http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1801.2/05282.html]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re not spot on, and the person he&#8217;s screaming at gives a long, in-depth analysis of the proposed linux patches in the context of the intel microcode patches which are meant as a workaround.   </p>
<p>This post in the thread, in particular, is informative (and the author gets props for not responding for Linus&#8217;s earlier baiting and name calling):</p>
<p><a href="http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1801.2/05282.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1801.2/05282.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2018/01/23/25-years-linux-5-minutes/#comment-564712</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 22:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gregladen.com/blog/?p=28745#comment-564712</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gregladen.com/blog/2018/01/23/25-years-linux-5-minutes/#comment-564709&quot;&gt;dean&lt;/a&gt;.

I have no way of evaluating his comments, but I would not be surprised if they were spot on.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2018/01/23/25-years-linux-5-minutes/#comment-564709">dean</a>.</p>
<p>I have no way of evaluating his comments, but I would not be surprised if they were spot on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dean		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2018/01/23/25-years-linux-5-minutes/#comment-564709</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 22:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gregladen.com/blog/?p=28745#comment-564709</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s your take on Torvald&#039;s typically blunt assessment of Intel&#039;s &quot;fix&quot; for the Spectre/Meltdown issues? 

I&#039;m not enough of a chip person (as in, not at all) to know whether it is, as he described it, complete and utter garbage. 

On the other hand, I seem to be in the minority when I say I don&#039;t think they are serious issues for single-use machines: the chance of someone using it and getting lucky enough that something important is exposed at just the right time is so low it isn&#039;t worth their effort. I realize servers are a different story.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s your take on Torvald&#8217;s typically blunt assessment of Intel&#8217;s &#8220;fix&#8221; for the Spectre/Meltdown issues? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not enough of a chip person (as in, not at all) to know whether it is, as he described it, complete and utter garbage. </p>
<p>On the other hand, I seem to be in the minority when I say I don&#8217;t think they are serious issues for single-use machines: the chance of someone using it and getting lucky enough that something important is exposed at just the right time is so low it isn&#8217;t worth their effort. I realize servers are a different story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
