Comments on: Question about the assassination of John F. Kennedy

By: Handy

Handy — Tue, 10 Apr 2018 04:16:41 +0000

I have been told WordPress is the way to go which my hosting company supports. I’m looking for recommendations on development environments, software, addons, I should learn and use. Thanks!

By: ??? ? ????

??? ? ???? — Wed, 13 Dec 2017 09:08:37 +0000

Hi everyone My brother suggested I might like this website. He was entirely right. This post actually made my day. You can not imagine just how much time I had spent for this info! thanks

By: dean

dean — Wed, 06 Dec 2017 20:58:20 +0000

In reply to Rob Smith. You are correct. The fact that Owald's wife testified (after he killed President Kennedy) that Oswald tried to kill Tippitt is completely unimportant.

By: Rob Smith

Rob Smith — Wed, 06 Dec 2017 20:41:32 +0000

There’s a wide gap between what the Warren Commission was supposed to do, look for evidence of a conspiracy , and what it in fact did – put Oswald on trial. And with Oswald dead he wasn’t really in a position to defend himself. The Commission dug up whatever could be found to put Oswald in a bad light and present his character as murderous. Thus Oswald wasn’t just the murderer of Kennedy but of Officer Tippitt too. There is a clear example of how the Commission overplayed its hand. The assassination attempt of General Edwin Walker which happened many months before the assassination of JFK. Walker survived the attempt and it wouldn’t even be a footnote in history if it wasn’t put down to Oswald. But if evidence had existed that Oswald had indeed committed that crime, he would have been arrested for that and thus unable to assassinate JFK in November . The Warren Commission isn’t circumspect on the matter , it attributes Oswald with a murder attempt which at the time merited no arrests.
The 1960s political scene in America was a violent one but the chronology presented just doesn’t add up.

By: dean

dean — Wed, 06 Dec 2017 20:41:28 +0000

In reply to dean.

Yes, the HSCA did conclude the assassination was probably the result of a conspiracy, because (in their opinion) even though the Commission and other agency investigators did a good job investigating Oswald they did not do an “adequate” job of looking for conspiracies.

The HSCA also concluded that if there was a conspiracy it did not involve any of: organized crime, anti-Castro group, FBI, CIA, Secret Service, Cuba, or the Soviet Union.

In 1988 the Justice Department wrote a memo to the House Judiciary Committee. The memo discussed a review of the HSCA report and reported

– active investigations were being closed
– investigations from the FBI’s Technical Services Division and the National Academy of Science had both concluded, independently, that ‘reliable acoustic data do not support a conclusion that there was a second gunman’

The memo also stated that Justice Department Officials concluded that “there is no persuasive evidence to support the theory of a conspiracy in the assassination of President Kennedy.”

By: Rob Smith

Rob Smith — Wed, 06 Dec 2017 19:08:42 +0000

In reply to dean. Which inquiries are you referring to ? There was the House Select Committee on Assassinations in the '70s . That found Kennedy was most probably assassinated as part of a conspiracy, so I'd say that doesn't support Warren.

By: Rob Smith

Rob Smith — Tue, 28 Nov 2017 18:54:36 +0000

Every man serving on the Warren Commission (yup , no women) could be described as a Washington insider. The Committee was made up of four politicians (one was in Dallas on the day and went on to become President himself) a CIA man, a top banker and the Chief Justice himself. I ask would you get any other key piece of history from a Committee made up of beltway insiders ? I know I wouldn’t.

By: dean

dean — Sun, 26 Nov 2017 16:42:54 +0000

No surprise mikeN got the Kosovo airport incident wrong.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incident_at_Pristina_airport

By: dean

dean — Sun, 26 Nov 2017 16:41:20 +0000

There have been enough inquiries since the Warren Report that support the conclusions made there, so there is really isn’t any doubt (reasonable doubt — there are always conspiracy mongers) about what happened.

It’s worth noting for one comment about the chicanery in Chicago: the results there, shady or not, weren’t enough to swing the election. There was far worse crap around Texas.

By: SteveP

SteveP — Sun, 26 Nov 2017 14:21:58 +0000

V.Putin the day before April Fool’s Day, 2017 “Russia’s Vladimir Putin said Thursday climate change was not caused by humans, as the White House announced that President Donald Trump would decide by May on continued US participation in the landmark Paris Agreement curbing global carbon emissions.”

V. Putin at Paris Climate conference, 2015 ““Climate change has become one of the gravest challenges humanity is facing,” he said. He went on, “Caused by global warming, hurricanes, droughts, floods and other anomalies are the source of economic damage.”

Two faced son of a bitch. Just like Trump. Also, in lock step with Trump. Trump is Putin’s puppet.