Not even a company employee, but a contractor.

Here you go:
Trump’s tweeting kept Bergdahl out of jail. The judge had already warned in denying the motion that his comments as a candidate were irrelevant. Then Trump tweeted, and the defense argued that Bergdahl was not getting a fair trial in military court with the commander in chief prejudicing the case. So the judge gave a light sentence and let him walk.

Also, Dean is correct with all of this social media. Random employees can access your account history. Private DMs, etc. Facebook has info on you in a private profile that includes information you did not give to Facebook.

(Sorry, sorry).

Which is actually yet another reason to not let him have an account. You wouldn’t be able to tell if it was hacked, no matter how crazy the hackers fake tweets were.

“You don’t want somebody hacking into his account”

Or the account of anyone else (although repercussions would be less serious). If one person had this much access to the account of the president, it has to be easier for people to have access to the account of any subscriber.

Arf, arf.

Con:
Raises a security issue. You don’t want somebody hacking into his account and starting a war or who knows what. Which would probably make Trump happy but highlights the point that he shouldn’t be yammering on Twtter in the first place. Which ruins my morning because it reminds me out of the gate just how stupid and vile that jackass is.

Thanks a lot.

But…

This bothers me. It doesn’t speak at all well for the internal security Twitter gives its subscriber accounts.