<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Donald Trump&#8217;s Science Adviser will be &#8230;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2017/10/27/donald-trumps-science-adviser-will-be/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2017/10/27/donald-trumps-science-adviser-will-be/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2017 03:49:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: dean		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2017/10/27/donald-trumps-science-adviser-will-be/#comment-551377</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 22:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gregladen.com/blog/?p=27565#comment-551377</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[When you look at all the anti-science positions this administration has staked out already, and the things it has done (wiping climate change research from current records and stopping it in the future, for the most front-facing example), then consider that anyone he would appoint would be as lacking in qualifications for that position as the other appointments are for theirs, and then add in the lack of clout a science advisor has in general, I&#039;m not sure that the consequences of not having one for this administration would be any worse than having one.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you look at all the anti-science positions this administration has staked out already, and the things it has done (wiping climate change research from current records and stopping it in the future, for the most front-facing example), then consider that anyone he would appoint would be as lacking in qualifications for that position as the other appointments are for theirs, and then add in the lack of clout a science advisor has in general, I&#8217;m not sure that the consequences of not having one for this administration would be any worse than having one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rich Bly		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2017/10/27/donald-trumps-science-adviser-will-be/#comment-551376</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rich Bly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 22:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gregladen.com/blog/?p=27565#comment-551376</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I nominate Clint Eastwood, he can talk to an empty chair even if the orange one is seated in it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I nominate Clint Eastwood, he can talk to an empty chair even if the orange one is seated in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SteveP		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2017/10/27/donald-trumps-science-adviser-will-be/#comment-551363</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SteveP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 19:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gregladen.com/blog/?p=27565#comment-551363</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Who will the sadistic Donald Trump&#039;s next science adviser be? First, the great leader doesn&#039;t need or want a science advisor. Why should he? He is an awesomely smart guy.  But if the adults at the adult day care center force him to pick one,   I think that we can be sure that it will be someone who can be counted on to cause the maximum amount of distress to the greatest number of people who care about the selection. Trump being Trump, the selection will be innumerate and scientifically illiterate.  Since Trump is the Russian pick of the 2016 political litter, we can be sure that he will chose someone who will do his utmost to contribute  to the dismantling of best and brightest government based science in the US.  The ideal choice for Trump would be an anti-abortion, pro-fossil fuel, anti-vaccination sycophant who can sing the praises of Trump on a moment&#039;s notice. A  creationist psychopath who can promote creationism in any proposed national science curriculum would be an immediate front runner. The ability to turn off national interest in STEM education would  also be a huge plus for our Russian overlord  president. And did I mention gun violence? Look for someone who is an NRA member in good standing.

I&#039;m thinking that Ted Nugent might be the guy Trump is looking for, although Kid Rock has a good shot at the position too.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who will the sadistic Donald Trump&#8217;s next science adviser be? First, the great leader doesn&#8217;t need or want a science advisor. Why should he? He is an awesomely smart guy.  But if the adults at the adult day care center force him to pick one,   I think that we can be sure that it will be someone who can be counted on to cause the maximum amount of distress to the greatest number of people who care about the selection. Trump being Trump, the selection will be innumerate and scientifically illiterate.  Since Trump is the Russian pick of the 2016 political litter, we can be sure that he will chose someone who will do his utmost to contribute  to the dismantling of best and brightest government based science in the US.  The ideal choice for Trump would be an anti-abortion, pro-fossil fuel, anti-vaccination sycophant who can sing the praises of Trump on a moment&#8217;s notice. A  creationist psychopath who can promote creationism in any proposed national science curriculum would be an immediate front runner. The ability to turn off national interest in STEM education would  also be a huge plus for our Russian overlord  president. And did I mention gun violence? Look for someone who is an NRA member in good standing.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m thinking that Ted Nugent might be the guy Trump is looking for, although Kid Rock has a good shot at the position too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
