Comments on: My Review of Hillary Clinton’s Book Part I https://gregladen.com/blog/2017/09/10/my-review-of-hillary-clintons-book-part-i/ Mon, 18 Sep 2017 23:36:30 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.6 By: Sady Berkeley https://gregladen.com/blog/2017/09/10/my-review-of-hillary-clintons-book-part-i/#comment-455722 Mon, 18 Sep 2017 23:36:30 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=24502#comment-455722 dean,

I wish I could say your inability to spell a four-letter word (HINT: it’s yuge, dude) was surprising.

]]> By: dean https://gregladen.com/blog/2017/09/10/my-review-of-hillary-clintons-book-part-i/#comment-455721 Mon, 18 Sep 2017 13:35:12 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=24502#comment-455721 “The stalking was plain as day for all to see.”

Yup, just as clear as the pictures that put the “huge” inauguration crowd lie front and center.

]]> By: MikeN https://gregladen.com/blog/2017/09/10/my-review-of-hillary-clintons-book-part-i/#comment-455720 Sun, 17 Sep 2017 22:56:52 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=24502#comment-455720 The only new thing that’s come out is the college in Vermont his wife ran into the ground. Looks like Hillary is getting payback by siccing the FBI on her.

]]> By: Jesse https://gregladen.com/blog/2017/09/10/my-review-of-hillary-clintons-book-part-i/#comment-455719 Sun, 17 Sep 2017 20:12:00 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=24502#comment-455719 bit late to this but I am curious, Greg, what you know about Sanders that other New Yorkers or people outside don’t? It’s not like the guy was exactly a hermit, and there’s plenty of stuff going back to the 80s you could dig into. In progressive circles (at least in the northeast) he was a pretty known quantity.

You could get into a whole other debate as to what that meant in terms of his seeking the nomination. But as I understood it there wasn’t any blockbuster revelation coming out about Sanders – at least not that I hadn’t seen in god-knows-how-many leaflets ads and such from back when he was running for Senate. (I recall back then the word was how awful he was for saying the Sandanistas had a point about mining their harbors and the US sponsoring a rebel army).

In fact one of the things about his legislative record was that it was, well, kind’a boring to people who aren’t into this stuff. He proposed a load of amendments to bills (some good) but that kind of stuff never gets headlines.

]]> By: Li D https://gregladen.com/blog/2017/09/10/my-review-of-hillary-clintons-book-part-i/#comment-455718 Fri, 15 Sep 2017 10:07:53 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=24502#comment-455718 Ok. Its not quite the same as Lars, now i have refreshed my memory. But its sorta close.
Rear Window is a great flick.
Tbe image i was thinking of can be seen here. ( with a bit of movement too! )

https://www.theodysseyonline.com/4-old-hollywood-films-not-bore-you

]]> By: Li D https://gregladen.com/blog/2017/09/10/my-review-of-hillary-clintons-book-part-i/#comment-455717 Fri, 15 Sep 2017 09:56:50 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=24502#comment-455717 #39 jeeeezzz! Wow.
Where have i seen that shit before???
Thats Burrs Lars Thorwald character.
Can anyone else see it?

]]> By: Obstreperous Applesauce https://gregladen.com/blog/2017/09/10/my-review-of-hillary-clintons-book-part-i/#comment-455716 Fri, 15 Sep 2017 04:14:18 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=24502#comment-455716 For now I’m only able to view m.youtube ready content. So I went there and reviewed a number of clips. Long story short you gotta love Cenk Uygur. Here is a pretty good presentation and discussion from The Young Turks. Watch the whole 7:33…

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Rr4OMx7jm6Y

To which I’d add a note about the douchebag way Trump shakes hands (when he can) by grabbing a person’s hand and yanking them forward off balance. You know, I had to laugh at his word salad burbling when describing his now infamous handshake with Macon in France.

Anyway, factor in Trump’s contempt for, well just about everybody, but especially for women (with an extra dose of creepy) and maybe it will start to sink in what was going on there– though I’m not optimistic on that score.

]]> By: MikeN https://gregladen.com/blog/2017/09/10/my-review-of-hillary-clintons-book-part-i/#comment-455715 Fri, 15 Sep 2017 03:06:52 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=24502#comment-455715 https://youtu.be/FRlI2SQ0Ueg?t=50

Compare with dhogaza’s picture above.

]]> By: Obstreperous Applesauce https://gregladen.com/blog/2017/09/10/my-review-of-hillary-clintons-book-part-i/#comment-455714 Thu, 14 Sep 2017 23:35:12 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=24502#comment-455714 Sorry. I meant MikeN at 37, not 39.

Mike, do you know what a podium is?
Do you know what it means to stand at a podium?
Do you understand motion and spatial relationships?
Do you know what stalking is?
do you understand social boundaries?

Please don’t take this the wrong way, but seriously, is this your attempt at humor, or do you need to see a neurologist about this?

]]> By: MikeN https://gregladen.com/blog/2017/09/10/my-review-of-hillary-clintons-book-part-i/#comment-455713 Thu, 14 Sep 2017 22:53:29 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=24502#comment-455713 Dhogaza, what is that right next to him?

I couldn’t believe it when I saw it on replay, was actually looking for something else. I assumed at the time that Trump was trying to get into her camera angle to produce a visual contrast for the home audience of how much bigger he is than Hillary, especially after in previous debates they were producing a split screen that had them at the same size. I was surprised to see that Trump was reading Hillary’s notes. Only when I played it again did I realize he was coming back to his podium(or whatever I should call it).

]]>