Of course it’s without specifying the source, it’s the New York Times….everything is an unidentified source, an unspecified source, a never mentioned source….that way we can imagine the source and declare what we imagine as being fact….it’s the Liberal way!

For example, here you are:

You – “who else could it be but organisations connected to the Trump mismanagement team?”

Because who else but the Trump team is in deep with the New York Times? Perhaps it’s Trump himself, we all know how he influence’s the NYT, in fact, I heard he was going to change the name to The New York Trump….that’s how embedded he is!

And that line about “British authorities provided access to photos”…that’s a lie that Trump told the New York Times to print…obviously he paid them off.

It’s a known fact that Pinky Sulzberger and Trump are in bed together, I think we need an investigation…

Maybe you should try reading stuff with due care and attention, as with:

The paper, without specifying the source, said British authorities provided access to photos of materials found at the scene”

Note “without specifying the source”. Given the outrage of British sources it clearly was not they who provided the offending material.

So who else could it be but organisations connected to the Trump mismanagement team?

I know you find comprehension difficult but you could at least try with something so simple.

“The police decision to stop sharing information specifically about the Manchester attack with their security counterparts in the US is a hugely significant move and shows how angry British authorities are.
The information from the crime scene wasn’t shared on a whim: the British and Americans have a lot of shared world-leading expertise in improvised explosive devices and scientists would be discussing whether the Manchester device tells them something new that could, ultimately, track down a bomb-maker.”

Fuck off betula, until you can say anything that is remotely true.

Right, Donald Trump’s influence resulted in leaked photos to the liberal New York Times….because he owes them so much.
I thought he was supposed to leak them to the Russians?

Here’s a thought dean, maybe you should read what you post before you post it…

“On Wednesday, The New York Times posted photos that show what it said could be the detonator, a battery, nuts and screws for shrapnel, and fragments of a backpack used in the attack. The paper, without specifying the source, said British authorities provided access to photos of materials found at the scene”

Remain dumb dean, it’s entertaining to say the least.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/25/europe/manchester-terror-attack-uk/index.html

The USA mostly voted for Hilary, the UK mostly voted to leave. I reckon half figured it wouldn’t happen, so they were safe to protest vote.

The only way USA can claim the number one position is by the inclusion of the consequences, which is world-damaging for the USA and just UK damaging for the UK.

You stupid dumbarse american electorate.
What, ya couldnt let Brexiters be the stupidest?
Just had to be number one.