Did you? Or do you find it 100% absolutely fine?

Or are you now wondering why BBD didn’t “bite the lure” of your asinine posts, therefore ensuring that no matter the outcome you can preen yourself in bed-wetting imbecility that you’re “winning” whether some random post is replied to (so therefore trolled successfully) or not (therefore you can berate for “hypocrisy”)?

But did YOU ask why he thought it fine to punch the hippies? You understood what he was saying AND TOOK IT LITERALLY, yet you only deigned to complain at SOMEONE ELSE.

How cucklord of you.

Don’t worry, though, there are still plenty of reasons to punch the hippies. No one on the right wing need be worried that their favorite past time is going anywhere any time soon.
”
BBD, did you object to any of this, or ask why he thinks its OK to punch the hippies? You understood what he was saying and accepted it. Suddenly you ask me to defend it, when I am using the same assumption. Greg was arguing that the hippie-punching is delinking from energy, and I point out that they are still being linked.

You sound embarrassed by your own reactionary nastiness, which is, I suppose, progress of a sort.

Yes, what was the point?

“It was a follow up” isn’t a point, since that still requires a “why?”, since it still says nothing about what the point of the quote was, it just passes the buck back to why was it “in” #7?

It’s no different from “I posted it into a textbox called “Comment” that I entered the text into!”

That you still don’t know what the hell you’re talking about is no surprise to anyone. The only mild surprise is you still think you can get away with a nonanswer.

Perhaps I misunderstood what was meant by punching hippies.

MikeN : “Having climate science associated with liberal causes is a counterargument to the stop punching advocated by Trump supporters.”

No, it’s not. All you’re stating is that you hate “liberals” and that you think your tribe should hate them too… because guilt by association… and because you say so?

MikeN: “Your response is to ask what is wrong with the liberal causes being attached, or at least the specific example I gave. I don’t think it’s necessary to go into detail of arguing against various liberal slogans.”

… because? All you care about is how good it feels when your knee is jerking? Because all you have is a bunch of rhetorical nonsense that you don’t happen to be able to think of at the moment?

I can’t explain why those things are bad so I’ll make some shit up.