She didn’t win. I twas settled. No win or lose. Settled. Retard.

“So we don’t know if Mann’s reason is “valid” yet.”

Yes we do. It is.

“I think Mann will lose on the merits”

But that is a complete and utter ass-pull form you based only on what you want to happen, nothing else. Even the judges involved think it a shoe-in.

You’re wrong.

“So it is hard to equate the two cases ”

No it is very VERY easy. You don’t want to because you hate Mann for being a scientist and showing evidence of AGW, and melania isn’t “a leftist” so you don’t care, even though the cases are identical in law.

“in my opinion”

Actually, no. Your opinion is that Mann will win, but you’re holding out for the really REALLY long shot, a’ la OJ Simpson. Hence your refusal to deal with reality.

Melania won because her case settled.

Mann’s case isn’t over yet.

So we don’t know if Mann’s reason is “valid” yet.

I think Mann will lose on the merits, which means I think his reason for suing isn’t “valid”.

But justice is pretty slow and we are still waiting for the rehearing en banc motion on appeal and for the actual merits to be acted upon by the district court.

So it is hard to equate the two cases until both are over (in my opinion).

Ah, nope, you’re lying about what you said again, shithead.

You made excuses and thought she was right but didn’t think Mann was, despite them both having the same valid reason.

Just as what was said about Mann’s work was blatantly false.

And, as he did with every issue, O’Reilly was lying about the case.

Here’s a clue: if O’Reilly says X is true you can be sure X is absolutely false.

Because you don’t mind when republicans do it, you just wanted to whine about it being theoretically done by liberals, and run the histrionics schtick.

But, if you WERE being honest, this would have opened your eyes to your confirmation bias, where you only read about liberals doing it but don’t read about rightwingers doing it. Negating your cries it being a “liberal thing”.

You didn’t.

” I would be against it”

It’s still happened. There’s no “would” here. It has happened, ARE you against it? You would have said “I am against it” if you were. Again, yet more proof you are not against it, only wanting to complain about liberals.

And, as with the attempts to get Mann fired, and his suit against his libellers, and with Ivanka’s suit against her libellers, you are busy making “reasons” why the rightwingers are right to do this, but never bothering with trying to make up a reason for those not of your political clique to do it, because you really would prefer just to complain and whinge.

See Tomi Lahren (spelling may be off). See also ACORN.