Thanks for the clarification on the details of terminology.

First, the building needs to be sealed completely for the lethal concentrations of HC to collect. Second, unlike most insecticides HC as used has essentially no residual effect once the building is ventilated. Third, HC in the concentrations used kills pretty much everything and was, in part, valued as a fumigant because it was effective on mice and rats, pretty much every living thing, in addition to insects.

Also, Zyclon-B was a HC delivery system, not the killing gas, HC, itself. The product was originally designed to be placed in the building to be fumigated and unsealed and spread out only as the operators quickly left the building. The HC gas was released from the spread bulk product as the Zyclon-B warmed.

It also needs to be noted that the HC in Zyclon-B was derived from peach, apricot, and other stones from fruits. Many pits have significant amounts of organically bound HC in them. Process and chemically unbind them and you have Zyclon-B. I keep that in mind when anyone tries to tell me that organic products are safe.

And once again MikeN demonstrates that he has absolutely no idea who “liberals” are and what they think.

https://www.opednews.com/populum/page.php?f=opedne_anthony__060105_chris_matthews_tied_.htm

Since you knew both made it, your “nobody” must be “practically nobody”, and since there are 7 billion people, the vast majority who never even visit this site, nobody noticed this time either.

And looking for the phrase ” We didn’t use them in World War II” only you said that. Care to support your claim or source where it came from if you’re merely yet again parroting another person’s claim (or lying about it).

“don’t use chemical weapons. We didn’t use them in World War II, Hitler didn’t use them.”

What? All of them?

Bull.
Shit.

Practically all of them?

Bollocks.

Some of them? Possibly, where, though? Because “some” include “one”, and you’ve given not one yet, so we don’t even know it is that high.

All we have is a moron claiming that others said it, when they take those people’s word for nothing, meaning that they should be taking their word for nothing here either, and, indeed, should be shouting, as they always do with their claims, the actual opposite.

So why aren’t you clamouring for comparisons to Hitler for the german anchor baby, “mike”?

No it doesn’t Comparing the size of London to the size of Paris doesn’t make London change.

Comparing people to Ghandi doesn’t devalue his greatness, either.

Comparing people to other people is a comparison.

Only those who have nothing accurate to claim about the comparison being incorrect make any bones about the comparison itself rather than whether it is validly computed.

Comparing people to Hitler devalues his badness except when it is done by you or against people you dislike.