Comments on: Resist Protest Event in Minnesota Draws Huge Crowd, Ignored By Press

By: Wow

Wow — Sat, 04 Mar 2017 18:15:58 +0000

Too bad you didn’t think to refute the point I made, “mike”. You are guilty as charged.

By: Wow

Wow — Sat, 04 Mar 2017 18:14:58 +0000

So many republicans terrified of meeting people outside their circles, the ones they’re supposed to be representing. So terrified they’re using the RWNJ shooting of a Democrat at their goading to cry off town halls. So much cuck, so little mind.

By: dean

dean — Sat, 04 Mar 2017 15:54:13 +0000

mikeN, the reference was to his regression models – i know you are ignorant of virtually everything past basic addition and subtraction.

Those models are worthless.

By: MikeN

MikeN — Sat, 04 Mar 2017 07:26:11 +0000

At least you caught on, Wow. Kudos to you for catching up with the rest eventually.

By: BBD

BBD — Fri, 03 Mar 2017 09:55:01 +0000

Yup, the usual false equivalence gambit. Generally employed by people who mistakenly assume you are as stupid as they are.

By: Wow

Wow — Fri, 03 Mar 2017 07:36:11 +0000

But this is going to be another example of the RWNJ’s simplistic thinking being the only method they can conceive of anyone else using.therefore you want dean to say that his model was bullshit and go “GOTCHA! The GCMs used by climatologists are ALSO crap, then!”.

Just because you’re far too stupid to hold more than one idiom at a time (and even worse, dumb enough to change it without caring or knowing it’s changed to fit your needs at the moment) doesn’t mean that it’s everyone else’s problem.

Lott’s analysis (which is NOT a model, only an analysis, dumbass) can be bullshit while other analysis OR MODELS can be valid.

By: Wow

Wow — Fri, 03 Mar 2017 07:31:02 +0000

And the difference?

By: MikeN

MikeN — Fri, 03 Mar 2017 04:56:34 +0000

I didn’t ask about Lott’s ‘gun control work’ but Lott’s Gun Control Models(GCM) in response to your objection:

If you take a large enough set of data, with a large enough collection of variables, you can develop a model that makes some subset of variables seem important and will perform well on test data, but not perform well in the wild.

By: Wow

Wow — Thu, 02 Mar 2017 11:49:35 +0000

“I do want the speech to change.”

Well change yours then. You rightwingnutjobs are the ones who bang on about bootstraps and self empowerment and taking responsibility for your actions.

Lead by example.

By: dean

dean — Thu, 02 Mar 2017 11:28:14 +0000

Lott’s gun control work is complete crap. That’s been known for years.