<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Electoral Vote, Popular Vote, Final Model Prediction, 2016 Clinton v Trump	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/11/07/electoral-vote-popular-vote-final-model-prediction-2016-clinton-v-trump/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/11/07/electoral-vote-popular-vote-final-model-prediction-2016-clinton-v-trump/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2017 06:23:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: D.E.T.		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/11/07/electoral-vote-popular-vote-final-model-prediction-2016-clinton-v-trump/#comment-552893</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[D.E.T.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2017 06:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=23258#comment-552893</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/11/07/electoral-vote-popular-vote-final-model-prediction-2016-clinton-v-trump/#comment-465991&quot;&gt;Jason Antrosio&lt;/a&gt;.

How did the crow taste, Jason?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/11/07/electoral-vote-popular-vote-final-model-prediction-2016-clinton-v-trump/#comment-465991">Jason Antrosio</a>.</p>
<p>How did the crow taste, Jason?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: notlurking		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/11/07/electoral-vote-popular-vote-final-model-prediction-2016-clinton-v-trump/#comment-466037</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[notlurking]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 20:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=23258#comment-466037</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Wrong, wrong and wrong......stick to the physical sciences...lol]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wrong, wrong and wrong&#8230;&#8230;stick to the physical sciences&#8230;lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Trump won :)		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/11/07/electoral-vote-popular-vote-final-model-prediction-2016-clinton-v-trump/#comment-466036</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trump won :)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2016 01:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=23258#comment-466036</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Trump won :)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trump won 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dean		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/11/07/electoral-vote-popular-vote-final-model-prediction-2016-clinton-v-trump/#comment-466035</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2016 13:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=23258#comment-466035</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[zeke - your post detailing your &quot;accomplishments&quot; further demonstrates that your statistical knowledge is empty, and the amount of training you have that would be relevant to climate work is zero. You, like so many engineers who deny areas of science they don&#039;t understand (climate, evolution) are just too stupid to realize it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>zeke &#8211; your post detailing your &#8220;accomplishments&#8221; further demonstrates that your statistical knowledge is empty, and the amount of training you have that would be relevant to climate work is zero. You, like so many engineers who deny areas of science they don&#8217;t understand (climate, evolution) are just too stupid to realize it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dean		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/11/07/electoral-vote-popular-vote-final-model-prediction-2016-clinton-v-trump/#comment-466034</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2016 13:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=23258#comment-466034</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;I have a degree in engineering (‘with great honors’) — which means I can wrap my mind around practical physics, empirical data analysis and statistics&quot;

Your degree in engineering means you have about the level of statistical education a junior stat major would have. In other words - you don&#039;t know shit.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I have a degree in engineering (‘with great honors’) — which means I can wrap my mind around practical physics, empirical data analysis and statistics&#8221;</p>
<p>Your degree in engineering means you have about the level of statistical education a junior stat major would have. In other words &#8211; you don&#8217;t know shit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: zebra		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/11/07/electoral-vote-popular-vote-final-model-prediction-2016-clinton-v-trump/#comment-466033</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zebra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2016 12:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=23258#comment-466033</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Zeke,

One of the smartest guys I ever met was a ME (he did have a doctorate though); I am far from a snob about people&#039;s education. In fact, that&#039;s the real point of my comment. It doesn&#039;t matter who you say you are, what matters is your ability to make a cogent argument for your position. That to me is the beauty of this kind of forum-- forget identities and CV and so on and have a serious debate on the substance.

So far, your performance is seriously deficient. You may well be what you claim, but you might also be a clever 16-year-old who is quoting stuff out of a college catalog. And you offer no arguments, only trite insults that you could glean from any Denialist blog, nothing that I can identify as &quot;physics-oriented&quot;.

As any good engineer from my generation would say, &quot;put up or shut up&quot;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zeke,</p>
<p>One of the smartest guys I ever met was a ME (he did have a doctorate though); I am far from a snob about people&#8217;s education. In fact, that&#8217;s the real point of my comment. It doesn&#8217;t matter who you say you are, what matters is your ability to make a cogent argument for your position. That to me is the beauty of this kind of forum&#8211; forget identities and CV and so on and have a serious debate on the substance.</p>
<p>So far, your performance is seriously deficient. You may well be what you claim, but you might also be a clever 16-year-old who is quoting stuff out of a college catalog. And you offer no arguments, only trite insults that you could glean from any Denialist blog, nothing that I can identify as &#8220;physics-oriented&#8221;.</p>
<p>As any good engineer from my generation would say, &#8220;put up or shut up&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Obstreperous Applesauce		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/11/07/electoral-vote-popular-vote-final-model-prediction-2016-clinton-v-trump/#comment-466032</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Obstreperous Applesauce]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2016 05:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=23258#comment-466032</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Heh! To late for you to save face.

But if you&#039;re going to continue to pursue argumentum ad verecondiam (arguement from authority: a rhetorical, weak and often fallacious logical argument --as is every word of what you have posted)  then you should have the integrity to give your name so that we can verify your claim and sample your paradigm changing, peer reviewed papers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh! To late for you to save face.</p>
<p>But if you&#8217;re going to continue to pursue argumentum ad verecondiam (arguement from authority: a rhetorical, weak and often fallacious logical argument &#8211;as is every word of what you have posted)  then you should have the integrity to give your name so that we can verify your claim and sample your paradigm changing, peer reviewed papers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Zeke4455		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/11/07/electoral-vote-popular-vote-final-model-prediction-2016-clinton-v-trump/#comment-466031</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zeke4455]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2016 04:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=23258#comment-466031</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Oh, hi Obstreperous -- you sound really frustrated too. (Didn&#039;t see your rant up there before I posted.)

Pretty much everything I wrote above applies to your flailings as well. Good luck getting your point across, really winning the &quot;hard science&quot; debate with all that whiny meaningless vitriol.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, hi Obstreperous &#8212; you sound really frustrated too. (Didn&#8217;t see your rant up there before I posted.)</p>
<p>Pretty much everything I wrote above applies to your flailings as well. Good luck getting your point across, really winning the &#8220;hard science&#8221; debate with all that whiny meaningless vitriol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Zeke4455		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/11/07/electoral-vote-popular-vote-final-model-prediction-2016-clinton-v-trump/#comment-466030</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zeke4455]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2016 04:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=23258#comment-466030</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Brainiac, you sound really frustrated.

But enlighten me -- did the planet get a fever when I wasn&#039;t looking? Did the beaches disappear? No more Spring Break fun in the sun?

As to the majority of your rant, Brainiac -- it amounts to what I posted above regarding your ilk&#039;s rhetoric &quot;“consensus vs deniers — believe or suffer the consequences! There can be no debate! Quash all who dare question us” --- except yours wasn&#039;t even at the level of grade-school English. More like a vomiting fit.

But you only reinforce part of my point.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brainiac, you sound really frustrated.</p>
<p>But enlighten me &#8212; did the planet get a fever when I wasn&#8217;t looking? Did the beaches disappear? No more Spring Break fun in the sun?</p>
<p>As to the majority of your rant, Brainiac &#8212; it amounts to what I posted above regarding your ilk&#8217;s rhetoric &#8220;“consensus vs deniers — believe or suffer the consequences! There can be no debate! Quash all who dare question us” &#8212; except yours wasn&#8217;t even at the level of grade-school English. More like a vomiting fit.</p>
<p>But you only reinforce part of my point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brainstorms		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/11/07/electoral-vote-popular-vote-final-model-prediction-2016-clinton-v-trump/#comment-466029</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brainstorms]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2016 04:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=23258#comment-466029</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[At least Ze-eek has admitted that he is ignorant of what&#039;s going on in the world.

It&#039;s cute that he imagines that all of two mild sentences, delivered in 6th-grade English so as to aid his comprehension, amounts to a &quot;rant&quot; or a &quot;routine&quot;.

There, there ::pat, pat:: little Ze-eek...  It&#039;s past your bedtime, and mommy doesn&#039;t want you playing on the internet and annoying the adults there.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least Ze-eek has admitted that he is ignorant of what&#8217;s going on in the world.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s cute that he imagines that all of two mild sentences, delivered in 6th-grade English so as to aid his comprehension, amounts to a &#8220;rant&#8221; or a &#8220;routine&#8221;.</p>
<p>There, there ::pat, pat:: little Ze-eek&#8230;  It&#8217;s past your bedtime, and mommy doesn&#8217;t want you playing on the internet and annoying the adults there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
