<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Electoral College Map One Week Out: Clinton Victory Likely But Not Assured	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/10/31/the-electoral-college-map-one-week-out-clinton-victory-likely-but-not-assured/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/10/31/the-electoral-college-map-one-week-out-clinton-victory-likely-but-not-assured/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 22:26:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Most Recent Polling Shows Tight Race &#8211; Greg Laden&#039;s Blog		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/10/31/the-electoral-college-map-one-week-out-clinton-victory-likely-but-not-assured/#comment-465914</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Most Recent Polling Shows Tight Race &#8211; Greg Laden&#039;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 22:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=23213#comment-465914</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] suggested a few days ago that while Clinton would probably win, there is a nowhere near zero chance that she won&#8217;t. [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] suggested a few days ago that while Clinton would probably win, there is a nowhere near zero chance that she won&#8217;t. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: How Will The Swing States Swing? &#8211; Greg Laden&#039;s Blog		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/10/31/the-electoral-college-map-one-week-out-clinton-victory-likely-but-not-assured/#comment-465913</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[How Will The Swing States Swing? &#8211; Greg Laden&#039;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2016 14:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=23213#comment-465913</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] election is one week off. I think I&#8217;ve convincingly demonstrated, here, that Clinton is likely but not certain to win, that Trump has something of a chance, but not a [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] election is one week off. I think I&#8217;ve convincingly demonstrated, here, that Clinton is likely but not certain to win, that Trump has something of a chance, but not a [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/10/31/the-electoral-college-map-one-week-out-clinton-victory-likely-but-not-assured/#comment-465912</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2016 01:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=23213#comment-465912</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Eric, the number of shades was a choice. I cold have made leaners but saw no real benefit in it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric, the number of shades was a choice. I cold have made leaners but saw no real benefit in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Eric Lund		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/10/31/the-electoral-college-map-one-week-out-clinton-victory-likely-but-not-assured/#comment-465911</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Lund]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2016 21:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=23213#comment-465911</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;You will notice that my numbers are higher than the major outlets for both candidates. I guess I have more certainty in my model than they do.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Part of this is because your map has only one shade each of blue and red. Most of these other maps have more colors depending how strongly each state tips toward one or the other candidates. 538&#039;s map has, IIRC, six shades each of blue and red/pink. Most of the maps I have seen use dark/medium/light blue to indicate &quot;strongly Dem&quot;, &quot;likely Dem&quot;, and &quot;leans Dem&quot;, respectively, with red/coral/pink for the equivalent categories on the Republican side. In practice, I tend to view the light blue and pink states (as well as the tossups, obviously) as potentially flippable, and anything &quot;likely&quot; or &quot;strongly&quot; to be definitely for that side (barring a black swan news development).

For instance, Sam Wang&#039;s current map has states totaling 254 EVs as &quot;strongly Dem&quot;. Compared to your map, he gives Hillary NH and PA, but NV is rated a tossup, and CO and WI are only rated &quot;likely Dem&quot;. He also rates NC as &quot;likely Dem&quot;, for a total of 34 EVs in that category, or 288 in the two categories combined. On the other side, there are 160 EVs shown as &quot;strongly Rep&quot; (he considers AK to be only &quot;likely Rep&quot; and NE-02 to be &quot;leans Rep&quot;, but agrees with the rest of your map). But there are 21 more in &quot;likely Rep&quot; states (AK and OH), so Trump really has a base of 181 EVs. Wang also has 29 EVs as &quot;leans Dem&quot; (FL), 12 as tossups (IA and NV), and 28 as &quot;leans Rep&quot; (AZ, GA, and NE-02).

Wang&#039;s map is based entirely on polls. He uses medians, so his map is less susceptible to outliers, but if the race is actually in flux his maps will tend to lag.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>You will notice that my numbers are higher than the major outlets for both candidates. I guess I have more certainty in my model than they do.</p></blockquote>
<p>Part of this is because your map has only one shade each of blue and red. Most of these other maps have more colors depending how strongly each state tips toward one or the other candidates. 538&#8217;s map has, IIRC, six shades each of blue and red/pink. Most of the maps I have seen use dark/medium/light blue to indicate &#8220;strongly Dem&#8221;, &#8220;likely Dem&#8221;, and &#8220;leans Dem&#8221;, respectively, with red/coral/pink for the equivalent categories on the Republican side. In practice, I tend to view the light blue and pink states (as well as the tossups, obviously) as potentially flippable, and anything &#8220;likely&#8221; or &#8220;strongly&#8221; to be definitely for that side (barring a black swan news development).</p>
<p>For instance, Sam Wang&#8217;s current map has states totaling 254 EVs as &#8220;strongly Dem&#8221;. Compared to your map, he gives Hillary NH and PA, but NV is rated a tossup, and CO and WI are only rated &#8220;likely Dem&#8221;. He also rates NC as &#8220;likely Dem&#8221;, for a total of 34 EVs in that category, or 288 in the two categories combined. On the other side, there are 160 EVs shown as &#8220;strongly Rep&#8221; (he considers AK to be only &#8220;likely Rep&#8221; and NE-02 to be &#8220;leans Rep&#8221;, but agrees with the rest of your map). But there are 21 more in &#8220;likely Rep&#8221; states (AK and OH), so Trump really has a base of 181 EVs. Wang also has 29 EVs as &#8220;leans Dem&#8221; (FL), 12 as tossups (IA and NV), and 28 as &#8220;leans Rep&#8221; (AZ, GA, and NE-02).</p>
<p>Wang&#8217;s map is based entirely on polls. He uses medians, so his map is less susceptible to outliers, but if the race is actually in flux his maps will tend to lag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brainstorms		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/10/31/the-electoral-college-map-one-week-out-clinton-victory-likely-but-not-assured/#comment-465910</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brainstorms]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2016 20:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=23213#comment-465910</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well, at least his numbers and his conclusions aren&#039;t biased.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, at least his numbers and his conclusions aren&#8217;t biased.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous34		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/10/31/the-electoral-college-map-one-week-out-clinton-victory-likely-but-not-assured/#comment-465909</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous34]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2016 19:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=23213#comment-465909</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I thought this sounded not bias at all but then I read the ending...then I realized this guy is crazy bias.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought this sounded not bias at all but then I read the ending&#8230;then I realized this guy is crazy bias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brainstorms		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/10/31/the-electoral-college-map-one-week-out-clinton-victory-likely-but-not-assured/#comment-465908</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brainstorms]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2016 18:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=23213#comment-465908</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ah, I see!

The Republican Party: &lt;i&gt;It&#039;s like giving syphilis to your children.&lt;/i&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, I see!</p>
<p>The Republican Party: <i>It&#8217;s like giving syphilis to your children.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Magma		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/10/31/the-electoral-college-map-one-week-out-clinton-victory-likely-but-not-assured/#comment-465907</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Magma]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2016 18:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=23213#comment-465907</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;That, and the GOP hate machine has been running longer on Clinton than on Obama.&quot;

There are GOP mechanics who learned their trade on that machine, worked their entire careers on it, then passed their tools on to their sons and nephews when they retired or died.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;That, and the GOP hate machine has been running longer on Clinton than on Obama.&#8221;</p>
<p>There are GOP mechanics who learned their trade on that machine, worked their entire careers on it, then passed their tools on to their sons and nephews when they retired or died.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: StevoR		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/10/31/the-electoral-college-map-one-week-out-clinton-victory-likely-but-not-assured/#comment-465906</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[StevoR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2016 15:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=23213#comment-465906</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good thoughtful analysis of the possibilities here. 

This worried Aussie looking on from across the pacific ocean but knowing how much impact the US elections have is most appreciative of it. Cheers!

Please Americans, choose wisely and vote for Clinton.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good thoughtful analysis of the possibilities here. </p>
<p>This worried Aussie looking on from across the pacific ocean but knowing how much impact the US elections have is most appreciative of it. Cheers!</p>
<p>Please Americans, choose wisely and vote for Clinton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
