Shorter:

God has handed me this … slippery … man …, it must mean God wants us to see him used as a tool toward God’s plans …

The child rape going on in the bible as “a good and proper thing for God’s Chosen People to engage in”???

“I didn’t bring up reproduction,”

So you think that children just appear as if by magic when you’re married???? No, children occur by reproduction. If you didn’t mean to have anything to do with reproduction, then there are no children, therefore you should never have mentioned it.

“Marriage isn’t about two separate parts,”

Yes it is. Even in your “ONE MAN, ONE WOMAN” has two separate parts: you know, the one man, and the one woman. One and one is…?

“it’s about joining a male and a female. ”

No it isn’t, it’s about marriage of two people who love each other.

Or at least, that’s what we mean today. Centuries ago, it was one man, many women, some concubines and most men getting nothing more than Pamela Hand. If they still HAD their hands,

“It pedophilia also wrong because I’d rather not gargle a woody (adult or child)? ”

You;re the one who is thinking about gargling the penis of a young male child. I never brought up paedophilia and your love of man-love making you crazy.

“is it going to be acceptable/moral/right when your team is doing it?”

According to your bible, the only and sole moral authority for mankind, it is.

I didn’t bring up reproduction, but from the “evolutionary worldview” that many here purport, how would homosexual intercourse improve one’s evolutionary odds of passing on genes and helping evolution along in its millions and billions years of change and development?

Marriage isn’t about two separate parts, it’s about joining a male and a female. Two replica parts don’t make “an operable whole” two different parts, that are complementary and helpful to one another make such a whole and are a picture of something larger than themselves. http://tinyurl.com/h5agzk5

The nation’s about to get a big dose of “love” in the form of a pedophile ring involving government officials.(Clinton for now, Bushes in the on deck circle) http://tinyurl.com/zeetwwg

It pedophilia also wrong because I’d rather not gargle a woody (adult or child)? Or should we say “not that there’s anything wrong with that”? You seem to be opposed to rape in #85…is it going to be acceptable/moral/right when your team is doing it?

Show us where it says it must ALWAYS be one man and one woman to produce a child, and that this CANNOT be changed.

When even your constitution can be changed, this is a priori impossible.

OK, so your insinuation is that there can be no belief unless it’s religious??? Do you believe that you can eat a grilled cheese sandwich? Is THAT a faith????

Or are you admitting that believers are morons?

“Let’s set the premise: You’re claiming that same sex mirage is a marriage. ”

Same sex marriage is a marriage.

“Terms have meaning, right? Words have meaning? ”

Yes, they do.

Marriage: the joining of two separate parts to make an operable whole.

Of course, if you want to say “to have children”, then once the children are adults (which BY DEFINITION is “reached puberty”), the marriage must be anulled.

Heck, once the sprog has developed to the zygote stage, you would technically have to break up the marriage, since they can’t have another child for a while.

Infertile couples, and couples who do not IMMEDIATELY have a child (we can give then a couple of months grace, I suppose), must be broken up as not doing what they’re contracted to do.

Note how love doesn’t enter in to your version of what marriage is.

“Marriage has ALWAYS meant one male joining himself to one female. People who don’t desire that relationship disqualify themselves.”

Since marriage has NOT “ALWAYS meant” that, people who don’t desire that relationship don’t disqualify themselves.

Yes, it’s hilarious, all right, ron.

So seduced by the thought of kinky bumsex from another man, you can’t stand it being possible or acceptable, since the only thing stopping you gargling a woody is that it’s “wrong”.

“as many females”

Not that there’s anything wrong with that….

Focus on this one statement in a feeble attempt to discredit the larger point.

ron: “Marriage has ALWAYS meant one male joining himself to one female.”

No. Marriage has ALWAYS meant one male joining himself to as many females as he can afford. Look at history, ShitFerBrains.

Good god you are stupid. Why ignore the widespread support for polygamy in the bible? After all, if the mythical standard men created as the basis for the bible sanctioned it, that must be okay?

But saying you don’t believe marriage should be between two men or two women, even when they love each other, doesn’t mean shit, since your opinion is not law and, thankfully, we don’t live in a society where law is so strictly crafted that it follows the outdated hatred based statements of a few goat herders.