Comments on: A Call For A Presidential Debate On Science! https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/08/10/a-call-for-a-presidential-debate-on-science/ Fri, 12 Aug 2016 17:55:50 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8 By: dean https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/08/10/a-call-for-a-presidential-debate-on-science/#comment-464037 Fri, 12 Aug 2016 17:55:50 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=22753#comment-464037 No questions on the selection, role, and level of personal access, of a science advisor?

]]> By: Brainstorms https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/08/10/a-call-for-a-presidential-debate-on-science/#comment-464036 Fri, 12 Aug 2016 00:15:22 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=22753#comment-464036 Nope. At least one of the Michael Mann posts went well above that.

]]> By: Christopher Winter https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/08/10/a-call-for-a-presidential-debate-on-science/#comment-464035 Thu, 11 Aug 2016 22:25:43 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=22753#comment-464035 Speaking of debates: 500 comments on “Only you can prevent gun violence.” Is this a record for Greg Laden’s blog?

]]> By: Brainstorms https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/08/10/a-call-for-a-presidential-debate-on-science/#comment-464034 Thu, 11 Aug 2016 17:59:45 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=22753#comment-464034 “Who’s going to debate on the GOP side?”

Donald Trump will send his hands.

]]> By: Desertphile https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/08/10/a-call-for-a-presidential-debate-on-science/#comment-464033 Thu, 11 Aug 2016 17:11:43 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=22753#comment-464033 In reply to Kurt.

“Who’s going to debate on the GOP side?”

No one.

]]> By: Brainstorms https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/08/10/a-call-for-a-presidential-debate-on-science/#comment-464032 Thu, 11 Aug 2016 16:10:59 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=22753#comment-464032 RickA, #8, did you read it or not? Because if you did you would know you’re missing any form of relevance.

(FTFY)

]]> By: Wow https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/08/10/a-call-for-a-presidential-debate-on-science/#comment-464031 Thu, 11 Aug 2016 15:31:35 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=22753#comment-464031 RickA, #8, did you read it or not? Because if you did you would know you’re missing any form of relevance for your link.

]]> By: Desertphile https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/08/10/a-call-for-a-presidential-debate-on-science/#comment-464030 Thu, 11 Aug 2016 15:09:37 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=22753#comment-464030 In reply to dean.

“Let’s not forget that calling the things that will occur “debates” is an insult to the word debate.”

… just look at the size of my hands!

]]> By: dean https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/08/10/a-call-for-a-presidential-debate-on-science/#comment-464029 Thu, 11 Aug 2016 11:49:06 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=22753#comment-464029 Let’s not forget that calling the things that will occur “debates” is an insult to the word debate.

]]> By: Desertphile https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/08/10/a-call-for-a-presidential-debate-on-science/#comment-464028 Thu, 11 Aug 2016 01:02:21 +0000 http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=22753#comment-464028 In reply to Magma.

“It will be hard enough to drag Trump to any of the regular debates”

All of the candidates would insist upon knowing the questions many days before the debate(s) so that their corporate sponsors may approve the answers. There is no way Trump will debate anyone with a brain.

]]>