<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Kentucky and Oregon Democratic Primaries (Updated)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/05/17/the-kentucky-and-oregon-democratic-primaries/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/05/17/the-kentucky-and-oregon-democratic-primaries/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 May 2016 17:34:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Laden		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/05/17/the-kentucky-and-oregon-democratic-primaries/#comment-469716</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Laden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2016 17:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=22528#comment-469716</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Jim, the best single predictor across the US has been percentage of African American voters. The percentage of African American voters in California is quite low.

When I&#039;ve run the model with all the ethnic data in place, the analysis tells me that all the variables but AA voters introduce noise. In other words, using only AA voters, I get the highest R-squared value.

But, California has a lot of Latino voters, and that increases the diversity and may have a big impact there. So, when I rerun the model with all the updated data, I&#039;ll put all the variables back in and see if California changes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim, the best single predictor across the US has been percentage of African American voters. The percentage of African American voters in California is quite low.</p>
<p>When I&#8217;ve run the model with all the ethnic data in place, the analysis tells me that all the variables but AA voters introduce noise. In other words, using only AA voters, I get the highest R-squared value.</p>
<p>But, California has a lot of Latino voters, and that increases the diversity and may have a big impact there. So, when I rerun the model with all the updated data, I&#8217;ll put all the variables back in and see if California changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim Sweeney		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/05/17/the-kentucky-and-oregon-democratic-primaries/#comment-469715</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Sweeney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2016 05:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=22528#comment-469715</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Once again, you&#039;re correct; a near tie in Kentucky, a decent win for Sanders in Oregon.

I&#039;m puzzled why your model, purportedly based on demographics, shows Sanders winning in California, which is a minority majority state. Sure, independents can participate in the Democratic primary, and the black population approximates the national average, but Clinton has so far done well with Latinos, and the jungle primary is expected to advance two women, both Democrats, neither necessarily white, to the general election to replace Barbara Boxer.

(Apropos of nothing: I&#039;ve voted for Harris, of course, and will again. I&#039;ve contributed to Sanchez, and received as a consequence a couple of mildly risqué Christmas cards.)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again, you&#8217;re correct; a near tie in Kentucky, a decent win for Sanders in Oregon.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m puzzled why your model, purportedly based on demographics, shows Sanders winning in California, which is a minority majority state. Sure, independents can participate in the Democratic primary, and the black population approximates the national average, but Clinton has so far done well with Latinos, and the jungle primary is expected to advance two women, both Democrats, neither necessarily white, to the general election to replace Barbara Boxer.</p>
<p>(Apropos of nothing: I&#8217;ve voted for Harris, of course, and will again. I&#8217;ve contributed to Sanchez, and received as a consequence a couple of mildly risqué Christmas cards.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Stan		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/05/17/the-kentucky-and-oregon-democratic-primaries/#comment-469714</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2016 21:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=22528#comment-469714</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Oops, I.D. not idea]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, I.D. not idea</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Stan		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/05/17/the-kentucky-and-oregon-democratic-primaries/#comment-469713</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2016 21:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=22528#comment-469713</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#039;Every resident of the state is automatically registered&#039;

  Not quite correct. Motor voter. You&#039;re registered when you go in to the dmv for a license, idea, or learners permit. If you don&#039;t go into the dmv you have to register yourself.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Every resident of the state is automatically registered&#8217;</p>
<p>  Not quite correct. Motor voter. You&#8217;re registered when you go in to the dmv for a license, idea, or learners permit. If you don&#8217;t go into the dmv you have to register yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
