Comments on: Ft McMurray Fire and Climate Change: Michael Mann Comments

By: Brainstorms

Brainstorms — Wed, 12 Oct 2016 22:49:04 +0000

And that’s “entirely” in what manner of speaking??

By: Blair

Blair — Wed, 12 Oct 2016 22:33:25 +0000

Actually Dr. Mann got it entirely wrong. The research http://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms8537 shows that the Fort McMurray area would expect a reduced fire risk…one of the few places that does

By: GregH

GregH — Tue, 24 May 2016 00:46:32 +0000

Tony Clough, does “American Thinker” speak for you? Is that kind of extreme right wing propaganda supported by your reading of the Bible?

By: Helen Smith

Helen Smith — Sat, 21 May 2016 19:20:52 +0000

A quantitative measure of the wind energy available at any location is called the Wind Power Density (WPD). It is a calculation of the mean annual power available per square meter of swept area of a turbine, and is tabulated for different heights above ground. Calculation of wind power density includes the effect of wind velocity and air density. Color-coded maps are prepared for a particular area described, for example, as “Mean Annual Power Density at 50 Metres”. Nice article you have shared, for more tips about alternative energy, please visit gaslicht.com

By: Tony Clough

Tony Clough — Sat, 21 May 2016 03:10:16 +0000

I’m a bit of a hobby researcher kind of guy here. Love science and also the bible. Was looking for any trace of that global flood and found something we all need to look into. The two say life was different, both say environment was changed. I have found many parallels in geology and biblical records. For now let’s leave bible out. but it does have the last word, the biggest clue we badly need. Learned about polar forests and polar animals that once lived in both ends. Some say there was more greenhouse gases that made a free ice earth at that time. They think the changes happened over long periods of time. Yet others tell us if temperatures increase it will be the next mass extinction event. Only in the polar areas do we find this changes. It is thought that in later times (Pliocene) the earth was warmer (THE SECRET OF ANTARTICA –VIDEO). This is where the contradiction lays. If CO2 increases do we life better and longer as the dinosaurs lived, happy and lush environments, or do we all die from extreme heat etc.
If the bible is right, the kind of greenhouse environment needed for change the earth for the better does not now exist. The kind we will get from our CO2 we make today could very well kill us all just as they say. Just because the earth was once a paradise of lush plant and animal life, does not mean it could get back to that without divine help. There is where the answer to the contradiction lays – the bible.

http://www.americanthinker.com/legacy_assets/articles/old_root/%231%20CO2EarthHistory.gif

PS: Is it not possible Ft McMurray created their own micro-climate – more CO2 makes more heat in your own back yard before it does the same to your neighbor’s back yard.

By: cosmicomics

cosmicomics — Wed, 11 May 2016 13:09:13 +0000

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/11/science/global-warming-cited-as-wildfires-increase-in-fragile-boreal-forest.html?ref=todayspaper

Thought I might add this:
The True Cost of Oil: Tar sands* and environmental devastation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=84zIj_EdQdM
*A not very knowledgable Danish journalist wrote “tarzans.”

By: Russell

Russell — Wed, 11 May 2016 02:10:44 +0000

Since the fire season has barely begun, the months to follow will determine whether this Canadian burn will evolve into a holocaust rivaling the Siberian fires of 1915.

Thus far only a few thousand square miles of Albert have been consumed by flames; estimates of the wilderness area burned in 1915 range from 140 thousand to upwards of a million square miles :

Nature 323, 116 – 117 (11 September 1986);

doi:10.1038/323116a0