<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Trump is going to lose the Iowa Caucus, and here&#8217;s why	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/02/01/trump-is-going-to-lose-the-iowa-caucus-and-heres-why/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/02/01/trump-is-going-to-lose-the-iowa-caucus-and-heres-why/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 21:16:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: MikeN		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/02/01/trump-is-going-to-lose-the-iowa-caucus-and-heres-why/#comment-467887</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MikeN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 21:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=22094#comment-467887</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think you have given one reason why Rubio did so well.  I think if instead of a caucus it were an election, the result would have been Trump-Cruz-Carson-Rubio.

Also, there is the problem that people supporting Christie can see they are not doing well, and jumping over to Marco.  Same with Carson, Bush, Kasich, Fiorina, Huckabee, Santorum.  I think Trump picks up little of these votes.  
I suspect many of this group were at 5-6%, and with an uneven split may have been non-viable in many precincts so they have to go elsewhere to be worth anything.  Or they just chose to make their vote matter more by going to Rubio or Cruz.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you have given one reason why Rubio did so well.  I think if instead of a caucus it were an election, the result would have been Trump-Cruz-Carson-Rubio.</p>
<p>Also, there is the problem that people supporting Christie can see they are not doing well, and jumping over to Marco.  Same with Carson, Bush, Kasich, Fiorina, Huckabee, Santorum.  I think Trump picks up little of these votes.<br />
I suspect many of this group were at 5-6%, and with an uneven split may have been non-viable in many precincts so they have to go elsewhere to be worth anything.  Or they just chose to make their vote matter more by going to Rubio or Cruz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John Seers		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/02/01/trump-is-going-to-lose-the-iowa-caucus-and-heres-why/#comment-467886</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Seers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2016 16:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=22094#comment-467886</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Impressive prediction Greg.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Impressive prediction Greg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lessons from the Iowa Caucus &#8211; Greg Laden&#039;s Blog		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/02/01/trump-is-going-to-lose-the-iowa-caucus-and-heres-why/#comment-467885</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lessons from the Iowa Caucus &#8211; Greg Laden&#039;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2016 15:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=22094#comment-467885</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] side, there are more lessons than I want or need to discuss, but I&#8217;ll mention two. First, as per this item, no matter how out of the box some of this year&#8217;s campaigns seem to be (i.e., Trump&#8217;s [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] side, there are more lessons than I want or need to discuss, but I&#8217;ll mention two. First, as per this item, no matter how out of the box some of this year&#8217;s campaigns seem to be (i.e., Trump&#8217;s [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: StevoR		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/02/01/trump-is-going-to-lose-the-iowa-caucus-and-heres-why/#comment-467884</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[StevoR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2016 10:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=22094#comment-467884</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yep.  Aussie TV and online news reporting that Cruz beat Trump and Rubio and  Hillary Clinton has very narrowly won and claimed victory over Bernie Sanders : 

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-02-02/iowa-caucuses-trump-white-house-campaign-faces-first-test/7132486 

Huckabee and Martin O&#039;Malley are now it seems officially out not that either ever stood much chance anyhow.  

Round 1 down just another fifty odd to go ..]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep.  Aussie TV and online news reporting that Cruz beat Trump and Rubio and  Hillary Clinton has very narrowly won and claimed victory over Bernie Sanders : </p>
<p><a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-02-02/iowa-caucuses-trump-white-house-campaign-faces-first-test/7132486" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-02-02/iowa-caucuses-trump-white-house-campaign-faces-first-test/7132486</a> </p>
<p>Huckabee and Martin O&#8217;Malley are now it seems officially out not that either ever stood much chance anyhow.  </p>
<p>Round 1 down just another fifty odd to go ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Randy		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/02/01/trump-is-going-to-lose-the-iowa-caucus-and-heres-why/#comment-467883</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2016 04:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=22094#comment-467883</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[OK Greg.  You&#039;re a genius.  ^^^^^^^ bowing now ^^^^^^^^]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK Greg.  You&#8217;re a genius.  ^^^^^^^ bowing now ^^^^^^^^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Who Won The Iowa Caucus 2016? &#8211; Greg Laden&#039;s Blog		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/02/01/trump-is-going-to-lose-the-iowa-caucus-and-heres-why/#comment-467882</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Who Won The Iowa Caucus 2016? &#8211; Greg Laden&#039;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2016 02:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=22094#comment-467882</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Trump and Cruz started out the evening in a real horse race, but for the last 50 minutes or so Cruz has been ahead by a few points (currently 29.7-26.6). It may be the case that my prediction, which no one believed I might add, will come true.  [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Trump and Cruz started out the evening in a real horse race, but for the last 50 minutes or so Cruz has been ahead by a few points (currently 29.7-26.6). It may be the case that my prediction, which no one believed I might add, will come true.  [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Desertphile		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/02/01/trump-is-going-to-lose-the-iowa-caucus-and-heres-why/#comment-467881</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Desertphile]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2016 23:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=22094#comment-467881</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/02/01/trump-is-going-to-lose-the-iowa-caucus-and-heres-why/#comment-467876&quot;&gt;RickA&lt;/a&gt;.

RickA: &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;&quot;Any republican but Trump is my motto.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;

Instead of voting for a lesser evil, why don&#039;t youy vote for a good?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/02/01/trump-is-going-to-lose-the-iowa-caucus-and-heres-why/#comment-467876">RickA</a>.</p>
<p>RickA: <b><i>&#8220;Any republican but Trump is my motto.&#8221;</i></b></p>
<p>Instead of voting for a lesser evil, why don&#8217;t youy vote for a good?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Desertphile		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/02/01/trump-is-going-to-lose-the-iowa-caucus-and-heres-why/#comment-467880</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Desertphile]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2016 23:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=22094#comment-467880</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/02/01/trump-is-going-to-lose-the-iowa-caucus-and-heres-why/#comment-467875&quot;&gt;Scott Supak&lt;/a&gt;.

Scott Supak: &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;I’ve been betting on politics for a long time now, and I win more than I lose, so I’ve given up poker, craps, and the lottery to do this. Great fun.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;

Alas, I consistently lose. In fact I always lose, without exception. Damn it. I keep expecting people to act in their best interests; it looks like time for me to change my strategy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/02/01/trump-is-going-to-lose-the-iowa-caucus-and-heres-why/#comment-467875">Scott Supak</a>.</p>
<p>Scott Supak: <b><i>I’ve been betting on politics for a long time now, and I win more than I lose, so I’ve given up poker, craps, and the lottery to do this. Great fun.</i></b></p>
<p>Alas, I consistently lose. In fact I always lose, without exception. Damn it. I keep expecting people to act in their best interests; it looks like time for me to change my strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Desertphile		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/02/01/trump-is-going-to-lose-the-iowa-caucus-and-heres-why/#comment-467879</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Desertphile]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2016 23:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=22094#comment-467879</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/02/01/trump-is-going-to-lose-the-iowa-caucus-and-heres-why/#comment-467874&quot;&gt;dean&lt;/a&gt;.

dean: &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Will Cruze’s latest flyers, with the blatantly false accusations of “voting scores and penalties” for residents, influence attitudes towards him? &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;

His targets were likely voters who are also likely RNC voters; so the answer is &quot;It probably didn&#039;t help or hurt&quot; if his victims are stupid (which is already a &quot;given&quot;).

Funny how Cruz worked so hard to prevent people (The Correct Type of People) from voting....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/02/01/trump-is-going-to-lose-the-iowa-caucus-and-heres-why/#comment-467874">dean</a>.</p>
<p>dean: <b><i>Will Cruze’s latest flyers, with the blatantly false accusations of “voting scores and penalties” for residents, influence attitudes towards him? </i></b></p>
<p>His targets were likely voters who are also likely RNC voters; so the answer is &#8220;It probably didn&#8217;t help or hurt&#8221; if his victims are stupid (which is already a &#8220;given&#8221;).</p>
<p>Funny how Cruz worked so hard to prevent people (The Correct Type of People) from voting&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Desertphile		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/02/01/trump-is-going-to-lose-the-iowa-caucus-and-heres-why/#comment-467878</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Desertphile]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2016 23:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=22094#comment-467878</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/02/01/trump-is-going-to-lose-the-iowa-caucus-and-heres-why/#comment-467873&quot;&gt;Greg Laden&lt;/a&gt;.

Greg Laden&lt;b&gt; Raucous, yes, I know that those guys disagree with me, but they are not making the case I’m making. I’m providing special insight here that has been ignored by others. When this caucus is over and it turns out I’m right, everyone will bow to my genius.&lt;/b&gt;

Indeed, if I did not recognize the fact you are right up there with Newton and Twain and Abbey (Ed), I would not read your blog. And I also very much hope you are right: Trump needs to lose Iowa, and badly (by more than 8%) if for no other reason than to give sane, non-lunatic USA citizens hope that the USA has a future.

I suppose Stalin had banners and buttons.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/02/01/trump-is-going-to-lose-the-iowa-caucus-and-heres-why/#comment-467873">Greg Laden</a>.</p>
<p>Greg Laden<b> Raucous, yes, I know that those guys disagree with me, but they are not making the case I’m making. I’m providing special insight here that has been ignored by others. When this caucus is over and it turns out I’m right, everyone will bow to my genius.</b></p>
<p>Indeed, if I did not recognize the fact you are right up there with Newton and Twain and Abbey (Ed), I would not read your blog. And I also very much hope you are right: Trump needs to lose Iowa, and badly (by more than 8%) if for no other reason than to give sane, non-lunatic USA citizens hope that the USA has a future.</p>
<p>I suppose Stalin had banners and buttons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
