<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Giant Solar Power Plants Don&#8217;t Need To Vaporize Birds	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/01/20/giant-solar-power-plants-dont-need-to-vaporize-birds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/01/20/giant-solar-power-plants-dont-need-to-vaporize-birds/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 12:27:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Lionel A		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/01/20/giant-solar-power-plants-dont-need-to-vaporize-birds/#comment-467730</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lionel A]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 12:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=22045#comment-467730</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Narad - extra points for pointless finishing non sequitur on a blog article not a scientific, all factors considered, scientific paper.

Furthermore an article of some interest - and hope.

Whatever, classifying anything  with complex dynamics there are many caveats to any conclusions and it turns out that cats can have an effect on populations - particularly if a species has reached a critical extinction threshold as is the case with many bird species across the globe where humans have introduced numerous adverse developments; pesticides, habitat fragmentation, pollution, building developments etc.

Here in the UK the RSPB (Royal Society for the Protection of Birds) &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rspb.org.uk/makeahomeforwildlife/advice/gardening/unwantedvisitors/cats/birddeclines.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;is on the case&lt;/a&gt;.

Predation of small birds by birds of prey is another factor often overlooked by those quick to blame cats. The population of the Sparrow-hawk was doing well and I have photographic evidence of a male (with Starling) and female (with Ring Collard Dove) caught in the act. I had noted a number of other similar corpses from time to time - typically a spread of feathers, with in the case of the male with Starlings the head ripped off - evidently if not killed quick the dying Starling makes a foul tasting secretion which puts the hawk off its breakfast.

Thanks for this article Greg and the link to an another interesting web site in 1000birds.com.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Narad &#8211; extra points for pointless finishing non sequitur on a blog article not a scientific, all factors considered, scientific paper.</p>
<p>Furthermore an article of some interest &#8211; and hope.</p>
<p>Whatever, classifying anything  with complex dynamics there are many caveats to any conclusions and it turns out that cats can have an effect on populations &#8211; particularly if a species has reached a critical extinction threshold as is the case with many bird species across the globe where humans have introduced numerous adverse developments; pesticides, habitat fragmentation, pollution, building developments etc.</p>
<p>Here in the UK the RSPB (Royal Society for the Protection of Birds) <a href="http://www.rspb.org.uk/makeahomeforwildlife/advice/gardening/unwantedvisitors/cats/birddeclines.aspx" rel="nofollow">is on the case</a>.</p>
<p>Predation of small birds by birds of prey is another factor often overlooked by those quick to blame cats. The population of the Sparrow-hawk was doing well and I have photographic evidence of a male (with Starling) and female (with Ring Collard Dove) caught in the act. I had noted a number of other similar corpses from time to time &#8211; typically a spread of feathers, with in the case of the male with Starlings the head ripped off &#8211; evidently if not killed quick the dying Starling makes a foul tasting secretion which puts the hawk off its breakfast.</p>
<p>Thanks for this article Greg and the link to an another interesting web site in 1000birds.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Narad		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2016/01/20/giant-solar-power-plants-dont-need-to-vaporize-birds/#comment-467729</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Narad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2016 21:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=22045#comment-467729</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I can&#039;t wait to see which of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.voxfelina.com/tag/wisconsin-study/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;usual suspects&lt;/a&gt; led to tossing in the &quot;cats kill many more [than 112,000,000 birds in the U.S.] per year&quot; canard. Extra points for vagueness, though.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t wait to see which of the <a href="http://www.voxfelina.com/tag/wisconsin-study/" rel="nofollow">usual suspects</a> led to tossing in the &#8220;cats kill many more [than 112,000,000 birds in the U.S.] per year&#8221; canard. Extra points for vagueness, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
