<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Better Biofuels	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/11/03/better-biofuels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/11/03/better-biofuels/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2015 21:46:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: cosmicomics		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/11/03/better-biofuels/#comment-473518</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cosmicomics]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2015 21:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=21756#comment-473518</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Installment 9 of Creating a Sustainable Food Future shows that any dedicated use of land for growing bioenergy inherently comes at the cost of not using that land for growing food or animal feed, or for storing carbon.
It recommends several policy changes to phase out forms of bioenergy that use crops or that otherwise make dedicated use of land.&quot;
http://www.wri.org/publication/avoiding-bioenergy-competition-food-crops-and-land 

&quot;The study finds that biofuels can be instrumental in bringing an agricultural renaissance that revitalises land use and livelihoods in rural areas. Price signals to small-scale farmers could significantly increase both yields and incomes, securing real, long-term poverty reduction in countries that have a high dependence on agricultural commodities. Large-scale biofuels cultivation could also provide benefits in the form of employment, skills development and secondary industry.
However, these possibilities depend on security of land tenure. Where competing resource claims exist among local resource users, governments and incoming biofuel producers, and where appropriate conditions are not in place, the rapid spread of commercial biofuel production may result - and is resulting - in poorer groups losing access to the land on which they depend. In these contexts, the spread of commercial biofuel crop cultivation can have major negative effects on local food security and on the economic, social and cultural dimensions of land use.&quot;
http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/12551IIED.pdf

These might also be of interest:
http://e360.yale.edu/feature/wood_pellets_green_energy_or_new_source_of_co2_emissio
ns/2840/
http://www.nrdc.org/energy/files/southeast-biomass-exports-report.pdf

My own conclusion is that we shouldn&#039;t let our our enthusiasm for alternatives to fossil fuels blind us to their possible negative effects. This concern seems to be especially valid for biofuels.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Installment 9 of Creating a Sustainable Food Future shows that any dedicated use of land for growing bioenergy inherently comes at the cost of not using that land for growing food or animal feed, or for storing carbon.<br />
It recommends several policy changes to phase out forms of bioenergy that use crops or that otherwise make dedicated use of land.&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.wri.org/publication/avoiding-bioenergy-competition-food-crops-and-land" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.wri.org/publication/avoiding-bioenergy-competition-food-crops-and-land</a> </p>
<p>&#8220;The study finds that biofuels can be instrumental in bringing an agricultural renaissance that revitalises land use and livelihoods in rural areas. Price signals to small-scale farmers could significantly increase both yields and incomes, securing real, long-term poverty reduction in countries that have a high dependence on agricultural commodities. Large-scale biofuels cultivation could also provide benefits in the form of employment, skills development and secondary industry.<br />
However, these possibilities depend on security of land tenure. Where competing resource claims exist among local resource users, governments and incoming biofuel producers, and where appropriate conditions are not in place, the rapid spread of commercial biofuel production may result &#8211; and is resulting &#8211; in poorer groups losing access to the land on which they depend. In these contexts, the spread of commercial biofuel crop cultivation can have major negative effects on local food security and on the economic, social and cultural dimensions of land use.&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/12551IIED.pdf" rel="nofollow ugc">http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/12551IIED.pdf</a></p>
<p>These might also be of interest:<br />
<a href="http://e360.yale.edu/feature/wood_pellets_green_energy_or_new_source_of_co2_emissio" rel="nofollow ugc">http://e360.yale.edu/feature/wood_pellets_green_energy_or_new_source_of_co2_emissio</a><br />
ns/2840/<br />
<a href="http://www.nrdc.org/energy/files/southeast-biomass-exports-report.pdf" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.nrdc.org/energy/files/southeast-biomass-exports-report.pdf</a></p>
<p>My own conclusion is that we shouldn&#8217;t let our our enthusiasm for alternatives to fossil fuels blind us to their possible negative effects. This concern seems to be especially valid for biofuels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SteveP		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/11/03/better-biofuels/#comment-473517</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SteveP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2015 14:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=21756#comment-473517</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A technology meriting more investigation and investment is the use of biochar from the pyrolysis of biomass to both produce energy AND sequester carbon as a stable soil amendment.  Carbon soil sequestration can be used to produce highly fertile amended soil known as terra preta. Improving soil fertility and sequestering carbon and generating non-fossil fuel energy definitely looks like a multiple win strategy. Soil nutrients are returned to the soil, and toxic minerals are not concentrated and made mobile to the extent that they are in ashing processes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A technology meriting more investigation and investment is the use of biochar from the pyrolysis of biomass to both produce energy AND sequester carbon as a stable soil amendment.  Carbon soil sequestration can be used to produce highly fertile amended soil known as terra preta. Improving soil fertility and sequestering carbon and generating non-fossil fuel energy definitely looks like a multiple win strategy. Soil nutrients are returned to the soil, and toxic minerals are not concentrated and made mobile to the extent that they are in ashing processes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brainstorms		</title>
		<link>https://gregladen.com/blog/2015/11/03/better-biofuels/#comment-473516</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brainstorms]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2015 23:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/?p=21756#comment-473516</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Further, they should forbid the use of ethanol and promote the development of using switchgrass, et al, to produce &lt;b&gt;bio-butanol&lt;/b&gt;, which has significant advantages as a liquid fuel over ethanol (including a higher EROEI).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Further, they should forbid the use of ethanol and promote the development of using switchgrass, et al, to produce <b>bio-butanol</b>, which has significant advantages as a liquid fuel over ethanol (including a higher EROEI).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
